this post was submitted on 17 Jul 2025
413 points (99.5% liked)

politics

24870 readers
3433 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Archived copy of the article, for when view count limit on main gift link runs out

It contains several lines of typewritten text framed by the outline of a naked woman, which appears to be hand-drawn with a heavy marker. A pair of small arcs denotes the woman’s breasts, and the future president’s signature is a squiggly “Donald” below her waist, mimicking pubic hair.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] shittydwarf@sh.itjust.works 103 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (4 children)

"There must be more to life than having everything”, the note read.

Donald: Yes, there is, but I won’t tell you what it is

Jeffrey: Nor will I, since I also know what it is

Donald: We have certain things in common, Jeffrey

Jeffrey: Yes, we do, come to think of it

Donald: Enigmas never age, have you noticed that?

Jeffrey: As a matter of fact, it was clear to me the last time I saw you

Trump: A pal is a wonderful thing. Happy Birthday — and may every day be another wonderful secret.

[–] Gigasser@lemmy.world 42 points 5 days ago (2 children)

"Never age" ...huh, I wonder what "enigmas" is he referring to?

[–] athairmor@lemmy.world 33 points 5 days ago (1 children)

“Best thing about high school girls is I keep getting older but they stay the same age.”

—Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein, probably

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

Yes thay do. Yes thay do.

[–] AngryRobot@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago

I'm sure everyone reading this no2 knows what it referred to.

[–] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 5 days ago

Lmao, they think they're sooooo clever

Yikes on bikes

[–] TipRing@lemmy.world 73 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Trump was a supplier of girls to Epstein through his pageants. Everyone is saying it.

[–] NoSpotOfGround@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

First time I heard of that and it would be strange for a buyer to become a supplier. "Everyone is saying it." Are you trying to muddy the waters with fake rumors?

[–] TipRing@lemmy.world 19 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I mean, yeah. MAGA is immune to logic and reason, but conspiracies are their refuge from cognitive dissonance. We just have to be willing to weaponize it.

[–] NoSpotOfGround@lemmy.world 11 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Ok, I see. I don't like that approach, myself. It feels like a short term gain that would turn negative in the long term, when nothing has credibility anymore.

[–] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 8 points 5 days ago

Nothing has credibility now, at least with the MAGAts.

[–] TipRing@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago

We are at the brink. It would be amazing if facts and logical argument won the day. I'd like to get there again, but when the manosphere or whatever is deciding elections then we have to fight the battle that is before us with the tactics that will get us to that bright future.

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Is there evidence of this? Let's wait til there's real evidence, because it's not unlikely.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

The interview with his Atlantic City manager said he flew 28 “modeling agency” girls down for a “party” for just him and Epstein. Epstein recruited more than one trafficked girl from trump’s house.

It’s not that much of a stretch, is it.

[–] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 44 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Yeah, this would have needed something much more serious (than a non fatal chronic condition) to get it buried under the news cycle. A dead VP and Elon would have gotten pretty close. (If anyone from the Whitehouse is looking for suggestions on Lemmy)

[–] kamenlady@lemmy.world 30 points 5 days ago (2 children)

which appears to be hand-drawn with a heavy marker

His habits will one day become his downfall

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 15 points 5 days ago

When Trump signed the letter, all hurricanes had womens' names

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 8 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] kamenlady@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago

People buying these things for as much as $55.000 is insane.

[–] criss_cross@lemmy.world 27 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Is he gonna claim on TruthSocial that Obama went back in time and planted this in Epstein’s book?

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 22 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I think he's announced a lawsuit against the Wall Street Journal

[–] Hylactor@sopuli.xyz 23 points 5 days ago (1 children)

This could be very good. A lawsuit would keep it in the news, and lying in court is a whole different kettle of fish than lying on truth social. And the veracity of the evidence and any supporting evidence would become public knowledge (probably). It's like "what are you going to do, organize all the evidence you have against me in a clear and persuasive manor?" says man who had evidence against him organized in a clear and persuasive manor, by a news source, and in full view of other news sources.

[–] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 17 points 5 days ago (1 children)

It'll never happen. As soon as Trump's lawyers explain the discovery process to him again, he'll stop talking about suing and do something bizarre and frightening to distract the media.

[–] aubeynarf@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

The real story. 🙄

[–] errer@lemmy.world 21 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] psilotop@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I know this scene and it's KILLING me that I can't remember the movie

[–] melisdrawing@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

It's from The Big Lebowski, the Jackie Treehorn scene.

[–] psilotop@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago
[–] Cornelius_Wangenheim@lemmy.world 14 points 5 days ago (1 children)

There was already abundant evidence of Trump's link with Epstein. I think the more interesting aspect of this is that it was published in a Murdoch rag over Trump's protests. It may be evidence the business elites are turning on Trump.

[–] ScatterBrain@lemmy.world 8 points 5 days ago

Vance/Heritage and Thiel reign is next. Putin is for it, I bet you anything

[–] chosensilence@pawb.social 21 points 5 days ago (1 children)

oh wow this is actually really bad for him lmfao. if his base was getting pissed before this then it's about to get so much worse for him because that weird typewritten note back and forth between the two.. h'oboy.

[–] criss_cross@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Looking at some of the messaging they’re saying it’s a made up hit piece because Trump doesn’t write poetry.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

You mean they’re lapping up his shit and learning exactly nothing from any of it?!?

That is so unlike them.

[–] Reygle@lemmy.world 10 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

I can't believe people elected a felon grifter criminal liar cheater pervert casino bankrupter with the express goal of burning the country to the ground and THIS might MIGHT be the line they draw in the sand.

[–] Death_Equity@lemmy.world 19 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Not dismissing this:

A lot of people who are rich or deal with a lot of people, like Donny, have an assistant that deals with the tedious social crap like birthday letters. A great assistant would know to send an appropriate card for a given person. So a devote christian would get a card with something about Jesus and a sex-trafficker would get a lewd sexual card. How much oversight on the cards would depend on the person and a control freak like Donny would probably see the card, chuckle, and sign it.

So Donny sending a card doesn't necessarily imply a close friendship like you would expect with a typical person.

All the same, release the client list and whoever gets nailed to a wall deserves it and it should be a bipartisan issue to keep harassing the admin until they release the names and people go to jail or some other fate.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 17 points 5 days ago (3 children)

So Donny sending a card doesn't necessarily imply a close friendship like you would expect with a typical person.

The sad thing is that Trump's friendship with Epstein really does seem to be one of the closest / only friendships of his adult life.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

If true, the implications of that are just so fucking disgusting... Because, presumably, it's mainly just the one thing that they have in common

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 days ago

I suppose it's possible that Trump thought that Epstein liked "young but legal" girls. That's who he was often seen in public with. Trump could have bonded with him over that, and never realized that Epstein also liked the ones who were too young to be legal.

For Epstein, it would have been useful for people to know him as "that guy who likes young women, but always of legal age". That way if someone ever spotted him with someone who looked too young, he'd have people coming to his defence saying "hey, he likes them young, but they're always legal."

I'm sure there were some people who knew the truth about Epstein, but what makes the most sense to me is that there was an inner circle that participated in the sex acts with underage girls, and a much bigger outer circle who just thought he liked young women. Otherwise, it doesn't make sense to me how so many people with a lot to lose were eager to party with him and didn't try very hard to hide it, like Bill Gates for example.

But yeah, maybe Trump was part of the inner circle. It would hardly be shocking given what we know about him.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] AfricanExpansionist@lemmy.ml 8 points 5 days ago

There's no way this was written by an assistant. It's very thoughtfully written, playful and coy, betraying an intimacy

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 17 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Article is paywalled, but here's another with a description and partial text of the letter:

https://www.alternet.org/trump-epstein-birthday-card/

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 13 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Yeah, WSJ gift links have a view count cap. Hence the archive link above. I'll edit with a fresh gift link, but it'll likely run out too.

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago

Never met him. Wish him well.

And the cheap sonofabitch, can you believe it, he pulled out a pen, scribbled over the '0' from "50" and handed it to his date. Sad.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 7 points 5 days ago

and the future president’s signature is a squiggly “Donald” below her waist, mimicking pubic hair

How long until the marching order to the MAGA influencers is: "Well, there's proof that Trump isn't a pedophile, if he was, why would he be doodling pubic hair?! Case Closed!"

[–] Mediocre_Bard@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

It contains several lines of typewritten text framed by the outline of a naked woman, which appears to be hand-drawn with a heavy marker. A pair of small arcs denotes the woman’s breasts, and the future president’s signature is a squiggly “Donald” below her waist, mimicking pubic hair.

load more comments
view more: next ›