this post was submitted on 18 Jul 2025
387 points (98.5% liked)

News

32233 readers
3908 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Blumpkinhead@lemmy.world 112 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Makes sense if your country is being run by child rapists.

[–] redsand@lemmy.dbzer0.com 28 points 2 months ago

Call your legislators office asking about this and Epstein while pretending to be conservative

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 35 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I could have sworn that "human trafficking" was the cudgel that conservatives were using to justify their ban on porn.

Or is this a situation where they get rid of the department so that the administration alone can define what human trafficking is?

[–] dogslayeggs@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

And it battles illegal immigration. You'd think they want to stop that, too???

Oh wait, that kind of trafficking hurts brown people so it can stay.

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 32 points 2 months ago

Epstein who?

[–] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 31 points 2 months ago (4 children)

The thing here though to note is, they're not legalizing human trafficking, they're just massively weakening it so they can't investigate people making a lot of money on it.

[–] turtlesareneat@discuss.online 11 points 2 months ago (1 children)

De facto decriminalization. Coming to a trafficker near you (like, really near you - probably in a hotel within 5 minutes of your house)

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Tbh, it's been that way ever since I've lived here. Dboyz hook them in, they can't pay the bills. One told me he was a "bodyguard." I guess if you look at it a certain way, they guard bodies they "own." This is a minimum wage, "right to work” state.

[–] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 1 points 1 month ago

Drug dealers

[–] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Im not sure what other way this headline could be interpreted.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 1 points 1 month ago

And since it is decriminalized, it creates a constituency to make sure it stays decriminalized.

[–] notannpc@lemmy.world 24 points 2 months ago

The pedophile party making life easier for pedophiles once again.

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 21 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I mean that would be against the interest of Epstein and his buddies.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 3 points 1 month ago

Buddies = governments, mega corporations, ultrarich

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago (1 children)

But Trump is the anointed one who will expose all the adrenochrone-swilling pedophile democrats.

Right?

[–] D_C@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago

Yes. Spot on. Exactly. Correct.

...
Or maybe, just maybeeeee, he's the one involved in a paedo trafficking ring and he is covering his tracks?
His actions pretty much explain which is the easiest to believe. So judge him on his actions...

[–] PalmTreeIsBestTree@lemmy.world 19 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Our government is being run by pedos.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 3 points 1 month ago

Always has been.

[–] Wilco@lemmy.zip 17 points 1 month ago

It's almost like they dont want to oppose it.

Republicans: The pro-life pro sex trafficking "conservative" party.

[–] lostoncalantha@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago

Are you still talking about Epstein? /s

[–] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 10 points 2 months ago

I do find this a bit odd, though. Because there's no better way to do whatever you want than to piggyback it on a "save the children" narrative. Seems like these departments could have played a key role in their authoritarian overreach strategies.

[–] abcdqfr@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Where is the convicted human traffickers, Tate brothers? Why are they there? Who is responsible? What hot topic are they caught in??
in a game of a thousand cuts, when do we slash back??

[–] Smoogs@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

Yup you covered all the W’s.

[–] NoForwardslashS@sopuli.xyz 7 points 2 months ago

More evidence that someone is spinning up a new business with a certain client list that "doesn't exist".

[–] TheCleric@lemmy.org 5 points 1 month ago

Of course they do

[–] TheFogan@programming.dev 2 points 2 months ago

For a second I misread the punctuation, IE I thought it meant "to combat human trafficking, the state department guts it's office".

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 month ago

Hmm, so who are they protecting by doing that?