143
submitted 11 months ago by brihuang95@sopuli.xyz to c/technology@lemmy.ml
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] makyo@lemmy.world 68 points 11 months ago

I hate everything about this: the lack of transparency, the lack of communication, the chaotic back and forth. We don’t know now if the company is now in a better position or worse.

I know it leaves me feeling pretty sick and untrusting about it considering the importance and potential disruptiveness (perhaps extreme) of AI in the coming years.

[-] Bipta@kbin.social 13 points 11 months ago

Same here. I like Sam Altman but if the board removed him for a good reason and he was reinstated because the employees want payouts, humanity could be in big trouble.

[-] Max_P@lemmy.max-p.me 12 points 11 months ago

Given the rumors he was fired based on undisclosed usage of some foreign data scraping company's data, it ain't looking good.

Now that there's big money involved, screw ethics. We don't care how the training data was acquired.

Now that there's big money involved, screw ethics. We don't care how the training data was acquired.

I dont care about ethics here, if the money would be excluded as well.

IF they would live up to their goals they settled for its fine.

But its similar to google, back in the days, with "dont be evil".

[-] devils_advocate@lemmy.ml 3 points 11 months ago

Can I find out more about these rumors somewhere?

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] FaceDeer@kbin.social 4 points 11 months ago

I actually like the chaoticness, because I don't like having one small group of people as the self-appointed and de-facto gatekeepers of AI for everyone else. This makes it clear to everyone why it's important to control your own AI resources.

[-] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 months ago

Accelerationism is human sacrifice. It only works if it does damage... and most of the time, it only does damage.

[-] FaceDeer@kbin.social 2 points 11 months ago

Not wanting a small group of self-appointed gatekeepers is not the same as accelerationism.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] davel@lemmy.ml 52 points 11 months ago

On the one hand, the board was an insane cult of effective altruism / longtermism / LessWrong, so fuck them. But on the other hand, this was a worker revolt for the capitalists, which I guess shouldn’t be surprising since tech workers famously lack class consciousness.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago

an insane cult of effective altruism / longtermism / LessWrong

I'm out of the loop. What's the problem with those things?

[-] agressivelyPassive@feddit.de 13 points 11 months ago

It's basically the paperclip maximizer combined with human arrogance/hubris. Just skim the criticism sections of the articles linked.

[-] davel@lemmy.ml 11 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

People are asking what is wrong with these cults. It’s a lot to cover so I won’t try. People who follow the podcasts Tech Won’t Save Us or This Machine Kills will already be familiar with them. Here’s an article relevant to the moment that talks about them a little: Pivot to AI: Replacing Sam Altman with a very small shell script

[-] Majoof@aussie.zone 6 points 11 months ago

Genuinely confused by your first statement (in particular effective altruism). What does that have to do with the board?

Not an attack, just actually clueless.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Bipta@kbin.social 3 points 11 months ago

That's what happens when the wealth is shared with those who make it. Everyone becomes a capitalist.

[-] Eldritch@lemmy.world 20 points 11 months ago

Actually that's just self interest. Both capitalism and socialism claim to benefit workers. But only socialism has remotely shown to do that to any extent. Capitalist hoarding and speculation is the primary driver of inflation and things like the inafordability of housing.

If you labor for a living, you aren't a capitalist. You're labor.

[-] prole@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Nah. It's more like the pusher man. Give them their first taste for free, and they'll be a customer for life.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Sabre363@sh.itjust.works 46 points 11 months ago

I guess the entire workforce calling the board incompetent twats and threatening to quit was actually effective.

[-] dm_me_your_boobs@lemm.ee 33 points 11 months ago

Sounds like they got together and forced their hand. Wonder if there's a term for that?

[-] Animoscity@lemmy.world 27 points 11 months ago

Maybe some type of group or team. Or union. Nah that will never stick

[-] Diplomjodler@feddit.de 32 points 11 months ago

I guess this will have to do as entertainment until GRRM finishes his damn book.

[-] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago

Any day now! I have a friend that got hyped up every time George published another chapter from WoW, but I just refuse to read any of them. I want a complete book. I’m not sure he’s got any idea of how to finish his own story.

[-] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

I didn't know he wrote for World of Warcraft

[-] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

I know you’re joking, but it stands for Winds of Winter if anyone is confused.

[-] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago
[-] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

Yeah that’s my feeling as well

[-] FaceDeer@kbin.social 2 points 11 months ago

It's okay, though, we'll have an AI that can do it soon enough.

[-] BitSound@lemmy.world 29 points 11 months ago

Man what a clusterfuck. Things still don't really add up based on public info. I'm sure this will be the end of any real attempts at safeguards, but with the board acting the way it did, I don't know that there would've been even without him returning. You know the board fucked up hard when some SV tech bro looks like the good guy.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] davel@lemmy.ml 11 points 11 months ago
[-] Nougat@kbin.social 6 points 11 months ago

What about his deal with Microsoft?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] OprahsedCreature@lemmy.ml 5 points 11 months ago

And the lord is back in his fiefdom

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] fragnoli@lemmy.one 5 points 11 months ago

Fucking Kendall Roy on the OpenAi board or something

[-] KinNectar@kbin.run 4 points 11 months ago

I maintain that this had something to do with a disagreement over which commercial applications are permissible for GPT-4, and that Sam Altman somewhere along the line negotiated a deal that allowed some actor to participate in one of the "forbidden applications" by proxy via a seemingly unrelated agreement. I'm talking Financial Forecasting (High Frequency Trading), Military, and Policing/Surveillance. Now that Sam's back and unfettered, I'm guessing we are going to see some of those applications come out into the light.

[-] ultranaut@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

Why do you maintain this? None of the details that have come out so far have suggested this, or not that I have seen.

[-] doom_and_gloom@lemmy.ml 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Did they change the governance structure? I'm kind of a fan of it, although certainly not of the EA board and how they put the whole organization at risk in their deals with Microsoft.

Also, does anyone else think it's braindead that these EAs thought slowing down AI development to preserve the inequal status quo was a good method for benefiting all of humanity? Could it be that their philosophy lacks any amount of self-awareness? lol (Not that the E/Accs are any better about it.)

Edit: Also lol at Ilya Sutskever being out from the board

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 22 Nov 2023
143 points (91.3% liked)

Technology

34795 readers
293 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS