this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2025
660 points (98.0% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

41555 readers
1519 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that.

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating.

-The Community !actuallyinfuriating has been born so that's where you should post the big stuff.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.


-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Politicians in the Bay Area want to remove bike lanes from the Richmond-San Rafael bridge because they are worried about traffic congestion.

Cyclists say removing these bike lanes will put them in danger.

https://richmondside.org/2025/08/05/richmond-san-rafael-bridge-bike-path-final-vote/

https://bikeeastbay.org/rsr2024-2/

During the public hearing, commissioner Karl Hasz was spotted driving his car

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 39 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The bike lane is like 1/3rd the size of the car lane and has more people on it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 97 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Did anyone call him out for this during the meeting?

There's a public comment section, right? Straight up ask why he feels it's appropriate be deciding matters of public saftey while actively endangering the public himself by distracted driving during this very meeting.

[–] Witchfire@lemmy.world 48 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (10 children)

From my experience with a different fight in NYC, these people don't give a shit. They have no shame, they only care about their golden kickbacks.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] Chainweasel@lemmy.world 127 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Why are all the top level comments from people defending reckless driving?

[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 28 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (3 children)

Based on this and a couple recent other threads I am becoming pretty convinced that more and more of the people on Lemmy are children.

Edit: I can admit that I was a dumbass who thought that I could do all the things while driving as a teenager. I am guessing the people downvoting me are either teenagers or people who don’t remember being teenagers.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de 18 points 3 days ago

If you've ever driven through American cities, you'll see that a high percentage of drivers aren't really driving. They're using their phone and tangentially feeding occasional input into their vehicles. Automakers keep adding Federally required "safety" features to cars like auto-brake and lane-departure correction, I've heard from some people they use those to make an ersatz "autopilot" and just let the car ping-pong down the road while they use their phones. Others, as soon as they *almost *come to a stop, the phone is already in their hand again and they're paying zero attention to their surroundings, probably thinking they're being a "smart" cell phone driver.

It is rare I see a USian driver actually operating their vehicle as their sole focus these days.

I've personally got in the habit of managing cars behind and in front of me with longer stopping distances and early brake flashing to get their attention off their phones and back on the road so I don't become an SUV sandwich, and also a quick polite horn toot when the drivers in front don't realize the light cycle has been green for 5 seconds because some other driver didn't pull forward, because all of the front drivers are on their phones.

So, they probably feel like they have to defend their idiocy.

[–] kepix@lemmy.world 14 points 3 days ago

you need to understand, that the murican car industry has made everything unreachable by walking and biking. its a total alien form of transport in newnaziland.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] moseschrute@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago

Probably driving in the bike lane

[–] brax@sh.itjust.works 40 points 3 days ago (3 children)

How does putting slow-moving bikes into traffic somehow fix congestion? Some dipshits are under the same impression in Canada, too... Like, have they all forgotten how much a single cyclist can fuck up traffic?

[–] Aganim@lemmy.world 20 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

The solution is obviously that the bikers are to join the daily traffic jam in a car, instead of entirely skipping the queue like selfish bastards.

/s, for the satire-impaired.

[–] knexcar@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Cyclists weren’t allowed on the bridge at all until the bike lane, since it was a freeway bridge, so they hope they’ll just go away (and probably encourage them to buy cars or take the once-an-hour bus).

[–] brax@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago

Lol so basically "think of the kids" once again forgetting about the kids.

[–] Muaddib@sopuli.xyz 20 points 3 days ago

They want to scare cyclists into not cycling at all

[–] scroll_responsibly@lemmy.sdf.org 31 points 3 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Trihilis@ani.social 37 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Is that even legal? Just holding your phone while driving can cost you a fine of €. 430 here.

[–] Cort@lemmy.world 34 points 3 days ago

It's probably on a hands free mount rolling at the camera angle.

However, it's still illegal to have video playing within view of the driver, so he's still breaking the law

[–] DrunkEngineer@lemmy.world 14 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

No, it is not legal. This bike path is part of the Bay Trail, which was enacted by State legislation, and served as mitigation for environmental damage done by Caltrans highway work. The BCDC was specifically created by the legislature to ensure maximum feasible public access to the Bay. So voting to close the path violates any number of laws and policies.

As for driving while distracted by the phone...yeah that's also illegal.

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 21 points 3 days ago
[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 19 points 3 days ago

It's supposed to be mildly infuriating, but it actually made me laugh. Not because I like or agree with the idea, but just at the absurdity of it.

load more comments
view more: next ›