this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2025
316 points (96.2% liked)

Programmer Humor

25750 readers
1746 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 77 points 2 days ago (14 children)

I mean aside of the variable name, this is not entirely unreasonable.

[–] shape_warrior_t@programming.dev 32 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I would certainly rather see this than {isAdmin: bool; isLoggedIn: bool}. With boolean | null, at least illegal states are unrepresentable... even if the legal states are represented in an... interesting way.

[–] nialv7@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Admin false LoggedIn false doesn't feel illegal to me, more redundant if anything

[–] shape_warrior_t@programming.dev 9 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

I was thinking of the three legal states as:

  • not logged in (null or {isAdmin: false, isLoggedIn: false})
  • logged in as non-admin (false or {isAdmin: false, isLoggedIn: true})
  • logged in as admin (true or {isAdmin: true, isLoggedIn: true})

which leaves {isAdmin: true, isLoggedIn: false} as an invalid, nonsensical state. (How would you know the user's an admin if they're not logged in?) Of course, in a different context, all four states could potentially be distinctly meaningful.

[–] nialv7@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

ah you are right! i am so dumb.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 8 points 2 days ago

The variable name is 90% why this is so unreasonable. Code is for humans to read, so names matter.

[–] Drewmeister@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

E: omg forget my whole comment. I agree with you that the name sucks.


I mostly don't like that role is typically an intuitive name, and now suddenly it means something I wouldn't expect. Why add confusion to your code? I don't always remember what I meant week to week, much less if someone else wrote it.

[–] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

If I had a nickel for every time that happened to me, I’d still be poor, but at least I’d have several nickels. 😁

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] BigBenis@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And what if it's undefined?

[–] tfm@europe.pub 8 points 1 day ago

root access

[–] bhamlin@lemmy.world 52 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Ah, the ol' tristate boolean switcheroo

[–] notarobot@lemmy.zip 2 points 20 hours ago (1 children)
[–] bhamlin@lemmy.world 1 points 20 hours ago

Yup. Checked, unchecked, and not checked.

[–] kionay@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

tristate as in three states or tristate as in five states?

[–] perviouslyiner@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Is that a quantum boolean?

[–] bhamlin@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

That is the jankiest thing I have seen in at least ten years.

Edit: because of course it's office.

[–] cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 30 points 2 days ago (1 children)

i would say why would you just not to isAdmin = true but i also worked with someone who did just this so i'll instead just sigh.

also the real crime is the use of javascript tbh

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 23 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That's TypeScript. I can tell by the pixels defining a type above.

[–] Maiq@lemy.lol 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Was looking at it and could not figure out why their weren't any semicolon's.

[–] ScintillatingStruthio@programming.dev 13 points 2 days ago (9 children)

Neither Javascript nor Typescript require semicolon, it is entirely a stylistic choice except in very rare circumstances that do not come up in normal code.

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Explanation for nerdsThe reason is the JS compiler removes whitespace and introduces semicolons only "where necessary".

So writing

function myFn() {
  return true;
}

Is not the same as

function myFn() {
  return 
    true;
}

Because the compiler will see that and make it:

function myFn() { return; true; }

You big ol' nerd. Tee-hee.

[–] Ephera@lemmy.ml 9 points 2 days ago

That's terrifying, especially in JS where no type system will fuck you up for returning nothing when you should've returned a boolean.

[–] exu@feditown.com 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] tdawg@lemmy.world 26 points 2 days ago (1 children)

This is pretty clearly just rage bait. Nothing is actually setting the value so it's undef. Moreover there isn't any context here to suggest if the state definitions are determined by some weird api or are actually just made up

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

Troof

I mean facts. Facts is what the kids say. Facts.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] livingcoder@programming.dev 13 points 2 days ago

I see this every sprint.

[–] ramble81@lemmy.zip 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Sadly this is (or used to be) valid in PHP and it made for some debugging “fun”.

[–] marcos@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago

There are several small details that PHP won't allow, but It's valid Javascript and it's the kind of thing you may find on that language.

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

You could make it even dumber by using weak comparisons.

[–] jbrains@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

What if role is FILE_NOT_FOUND?!

[–] foxglove@lazysoci.al 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

if it's 'FILE_NOT_FOUND' then the string will be read as truthy and you will get 'User is admin' logged.

[–] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 30 points 2 days ago (6 children)

Ackshually three equal signs check for type as well. So mere truthiness is not enough. It has to be exactly true.

Also, everyone knows FILE_NOT_FOUND isn't a string but a boolean value.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

role is never instantiated, so the... privileged....logs.... will never be called

Edit: Actually no logs at all, I read the null as undefined on first skim

load more comments
view more: next ›