this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2025
863 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

74438 readers
3762 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Amberskin@europe.pub 73 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Uh, are they admitting they are trying to circumvent technological protections setup to restrict access to a system?

Isn’t that a literal computer crime?

[–] dinckelman@lemmy.world 46 points 5 days ago (1 children)

No-no, see. When an AI-first company does it, it's actually called courageous innovation. Crimes are for poor people

[–] silicon@lemmy.world 11 points 5 days ago

See: Facebook/Meta

[–] utopiah@lemmy.world 16 points 5 days ago (2 children)

puts on evil hat CloudFlare should DRM their protection then DMCA Perplexity and other US based "AI" companies to oblivion. Side effect, might break the Internet.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Glitchvid@lemmy.world 254 points 6 days ago (3 children)

When a firm outright admits to bypassing or trying to bypass measures taken to keep them out, you think that would be a slam dunk case of unauthorized access under the CFAA with felony enhancements.

[–] GamingChairModel@lemmy.world 103 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Fuck that. I don't need prosecutors and the courts to rule that accessing publicly available information in a way that the website owner doesn't want is literally a crime. That logic would extend to ad blockers and editing HTML/js in an "inspect element" tag.

[–] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world 60 points 6 days ago (35 children)

That logic would not extend to ad blockers, as the point of concern is gaining unauthorized access to a computer system or asset. Blocking ads would not be considered gaining unauthorized access to anything. In fact it would be the opposite of that.

load more comments (35 replies)
[–] kibiz0r@midwest.social 28 points 6 days ago (1 children)

They already prosecute people under the unauthorized access provision. They just don’t prosecute rich people under it.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 244 points 6 days ago (1 children)

It's difficult to be a shittier company than OpenAI, but Perplexity seems to be trying hard.

[–] Brunbrun6766@lemmy.world 74 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Step 1, SOMEHOW find a more punchable face than Altman

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 12 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

put META android zuckerberg on or mechahitler musk.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] WolfLink@sh.itjust.works 155 points 6 days ago (1 children)

This is a nice CloudFlare ad

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 31 points 6 days ago (13 children)

yeah. still not worth dealing with fucking cloudflare. fuck cloudflare.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] Electricd@lemmybefree.net 38 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I don't like cloudflare but it's nice that they allow people to stop AI scrapping if they want to

[–] tempest@lemmy.ca 27 points 5 days ago (4 children)

CloudFlare has become an Internet protection racket and I'm not happy about it.

[–] Laser@feddit.org 21 points 5 days ago (1 children)

It's been this from the very beginning. But they don't fit the definition of a protection racket as they're not the ones attacking you if you don't pay up. So they're more like a security company that has no competitors due to the needed investment to operate.

[–] A1kmm@lemmy.amxl.com 4 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Cloudflare are notorious for shielding cybercrime sites. You can't even complain about abuse of Cloudflare about them, they'll just forward on your abuse complaint to the likely dodgy host of the cybercrime site. They don't even have a channel to complain to them about network abuse of their DNS services.

So they certainly are an enabler of the cybercriminals they purport to protect people from.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Kissaki@feddit.org 105 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (3 children)

Perplexity argues that a platform’s inability to differentiate between helpful AI assistants and harmful bots causes misclassification of legitimate web traffic.

So, I assume Perplexity uses appropriate identifiable user-agent headers, to allow hosters to decide whether to serve them one way or another?

[–] lime@feddit.nu 39 points 6 days ago (4 children)

yeah it's almost like there as already a system for this in place

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today 10 points 5 days ago (2 children)

And I'm assuming if the robots.txt state their UserAgent isn't allowed to crawl, it obeys it, right? :P

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] tibi@lemmy.world 70 points 6 days ago

You could say they are... Perplexed.

[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 75 points 6 days ago

Traveling snake oil salesman complains he can't pick people's locks.

[–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 94 points 6 days ago
[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 34 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Can't believe I've lived to see Cloudflare be the good guys

[–] sunbeam60@lemmy.ml 9 points 5 days ago

They’re not. They’re using this as an excuse to become paid gatekeepers of the internet as we know it. All that’s happening is that Cloudflare is using this to menuever into position where they can say “nice traffic you’ve got there - would be a shame if something happened to it”.

AI companies are crap.

What Cloudflare is doing here is also crap.

And we’re cheering it on.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world 58 points 6 days ago (1 children)

That’s the entire point, dipshit. I wish we got one of the cool techno dystopias rather than this boring corporate idiot one.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 69 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 54 points 6 days ago

As far as security is concerned, their w's are pretty common tbh. It's just the whole centralization issue.

[–] EtherWhack@lemmy.world 51 points 6 days ago
[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today 47 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Good. I went through my CF panel, and blocked some of those "AI Assistants" that by default were open, including Perplexity's.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] sylver_dragon@lemmy.world 51 points 6 days ago (3 children)

You'd think that a competent technology company, with their own AI would be able to figure out a way to spoof Cloudflare's checks. I'd still think that.

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 69 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (3 children)

Or find a more efficient way to manage data, since their current approach is basically DDOSing the internet for training data and also for responding to user interactions.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 32 points 6 days ago

see, but they're not competent. further, they don't care. most of these ai companies are snake oil. they're selling you a solution that doesn't meaningfully solve a problem. their main way of surviving is saying "this is what it can do now, just imagine what it can do if you invest money in my company."

they're scammers, the lot of them, running ponzi schemes with our money. if the planet dies for it, that's no concern of theirs. ponzi schemes require the schemer to have no long term plan, just a line of credit that they can keep drawing from until they skip town before the tax collector comes

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 38 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] prex@aussie.zone 26 points 6 days ago

They tried nothing & they're all out of ideas.

[–] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 34 points 6 days ago

Well... Good.

good, that means it’s working

I’m gonna be frustrated (though not surprised) if the response is anything other than this.

[–] wosat@lemmy.world 32 points 6 days ago

This is why companies like Perplexity and OpenAI are creating browsers.

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 12 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (3 children)

they cant get their ai to check a box that says "I am not a robot"? I'd think thatd be a first year comp sci student level task. And robots.txt files were basically always voluntary compliance anyway.

[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 17 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Cloudflare actually fully fingerprints your browser and even sells that data. Thats your IP, TLS, operating system, full browser environment, installed extensions, GPU capabilities etc. It's all tracked before the box even shows up, in fact the box is there to give the runtime more time to fingerprint you.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›