this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2025
172 points (94.3% liked)

No Stupid Questions

43071 readers
1091 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The more I hear people talk about it who aren't cis-het men, the more I hear criticism about the concept. But so far, I've only heard people say that it's stupid, that it's not a thing, that it's men's own fault etc. But I've yet to understand where that criticism comes from. I don't want to start a discussion on whether or not it's real or not. I just want to understand where the critics are coming from.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] lemmysquezzy@lemmy.world 1 points 9 minutes ago

OP, I do want to start a discussion about if it is real.

It is starting to feel like selective breeding being manipulative by AI for the wealthy and religious groups. Meanwhile, we keep debating gender wars and loneliness. It would not surprise me if this wasn't manufactured through propaganda and social media. Even ironically the 6ft, blue eyes, meme was either a call for men to do better, or for women to date higher status men.

Everything is more expensive which limits the working class. Having children is prohibitively expensive. It is of little surprise that there is an entire group of men that are not just lonely, but economically outside of purview, causing loneliness. There are also trends related to formal education that would support this narrative regarding men and women. Upward mobility has shown millenials are worse off than their parents too.

To my understanding even Gen. Z is not dating to a large degree. There is also a push for young men to join the trades and not pursue higher education. So if it is not generational, what other forces are at play?

Given the exaggerated idea of a loneliness epidemic, why don't we hear about the female loneliness epidemic? How are so many men "failing" at talking to women. It's not an epidemic, it's manufactured on purpose. I also belive dating apps are being used in this campaign as well, either for profit, or more so, strict social engineering.

Tldr: I don't blame men or women, but I do explore the impact of AI and social engineering applied against the working class.

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 6 points 2 hours ago

A lot of people can't see things from any perspective beyond their own limited worldview. If they don't experience a problem, it doesn't exist or it's not that bad and everyone should focus on their problems instead or if they are experiencing something it must be happening to everyone. I think this is causing a lot of the conflict around this issue. There is also the fact that a lot of the men complaining about this issue come at it not so much as "I'm lonely" but as "I'm not getting laid". Which loses them a lot of sympathy.

Men, by and large, create toxicity within their own circles. Male culture has a lot of issues and a lot of unrealistic expectations are put in men in US society. Some external, but the majority come from inside. The whole alpha male culture bullshit that permeantes it. There's a lot, and I mean a LOT of good that can come from healthy male culture. But right now it's like men have a branding issue where the loudest among them are also the worst (the Andrew Tates of the world).

[–] WaffleWarrior@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Being a man is tricky. Full grown males can be physically dangerous and I think there is a subtle undercurrent of worry with all men they may be dealing with a hostile moron, or a worry someone may try to assert dominance. Men are organically closed off past a certain age because of this.

Men also experience allot of these weird power dynamics growing up. Both men and women kind of seek to control and bully youger boys and men until they come into their own.....and suddenly they are grown and terrifying if some respects and everyone magically backs the f*** off

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network -1 points 2 hours ago

I kind of assume it's the juxtaposition of "I as a white man have immense social privilege" with "I can't get anyone to play with me". Like, other people are worried about being abducted on the street and you're sad you can't play basketball with your bros?

The sadness of loneliness can be real but in contrast to other things it can feel like it needs to be triaged into a lower priority. And then some men lose their shit over that, which makes people take them less seriously.

[–] Rooty@lemmy.world 8 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

On a related note, I wish we would acknowledge that men socialize different and that guys doing stuff together is therapeutic. Ruminating on emotions can have a negative effect in men, while work therapy can be much effective that talk therapy.

[–] WanderWisley@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago

I think part of it also depends on were you live. Just as a personal experience I live in a very rural part of northern Nevada, I’m born a raised here. The population is about 4k and honestly I would say 90% of the population are hardcore conservatives. Even as a kid I knew that I didn’t fit in with anyone else. I would usually just keep to myself all throughout school and even now as a 42 year old man I barely speak to anyone. It is lonely but the alternative is a no go for me especially now with politics being such a big part of peoples identity.

[–] figjam@midwest.social 7 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I think it has to do with the death of 3rd spaces which used to be an outlet for socialization. But as a man, I'm also not lonely. I have friends and acquaintances and I get to go outside sometimes.

[–] Nikls94@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

This right here. But even for our parents this is true.

I remember back when we could easily get some beers and sit at the local park or at the riverbed. But now? Everything’s private property and the bars are way too expensive to spend 5 hours in. I don’t know the last time I played Billard - or even have seen a pool table itself.

[–] hanrahan@slrpnk.net 7 points 12 hours ago

I have no idea but thought I'd throw out that, as a 58yr old cis white guy I've never been lonely in my life, i have literally no idea what that's like and don't get involved in hypotheses about it all because I have nothing to bring to the debate. I do find human behaviour interesting (and mostly bizzare) though.

The more time I spend with people the more I crave being alone but that's a different thing.

I now live on the edge of a tiny village in the middle of no where Australia and lived in a small cottage off grid in the bush for 10 years previously bit alos loved in an apartment in the sky in a largish city.

One thing I noticed, I found the car free existence ina city bought me into contact with people all the time, even walking you'd see people people and say hello. Stop at a crossing and have a small conversation occasionally etc. i even said hello to women and was never called a pervert ;)

[–] Preventer79@sh.itjust.works 11 points 14 hours ago

Can we please leave gender war slop back at the old site please?

[–] Olgratin_Magmatoe@slrpnk.net 39 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

I've seen three sides to it.

Side 1: "boo hoo nobody will fuck me because I don't think other people should have rights"

Side 2: not having strong friendships/relationships because our society is built around capitalism, cars, and social media (this obviously applies across genders, this side therefore is a generalized loneliness epidemic, not a male gendered one)

Side 3: men get socially punished for being vulnerable

In my mind only the second & third side is worth listening to.

[–] Tedesche@lemmy.world 4 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

Side 2 has not actual relevance to the problem itself. These societal tropes are not why men are having a hard time finding women. It’s just a societal trope posing as an explanation.

Side 3 is the only relevant issue. Men are constantly told they need to be more vulnerable or their masculinity is toxic, and yet when they express themselves vulnerably, they’re punished for it.

The issue, as I see it, is that some advocates of the “toxic masculinity” narrative often don’t fully acknowledge the ways in which women can also reinforce those same patterns.

A deeper concern is that many feminists present themselves as speaking on behalf of all women, when in reality most women don’t identify as feminists. As a result, what’s being represented is more of a particular set of progressive gender beliefs than the broader experiences of women in general.

To be clear, I actually agree with many feminist perspectives overall. However, I find that the movement’s messaging is often counterproductive—it can come across as unnecessarily divisive and, at times, dismissive of men. Because of this, even when the arguments are largely valid, they struggle to gain wider support.

[–] Goldholz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

Side 2 is very relevant. If you are lonely you get easily into very terrible sides of society and mindsets. I speak from experience. If you dont have a sense of belonging you also have no sense of self, but then come people that tell you to have a part in their group because of race, religion, nationality, or any other extremist reason.

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 1 points 2 hours ago

If you dont have a sense of belonging you also have no sense of self,

Not sure I agree with that. I don't have much sense of belonging but I know exactly who I am. If anything that's why I usually feel like I don't belong.

[–] Tedesche@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

Fair enough, I should have been clearer. I recognize that social isolation has deleterious effects on people. The part I was dismissing was the attribution to capitalism. Capitalism does not cause this effect. Other factors are responsible.

[–] EnsignWashout@startrek.website 0 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Would you accept "under-regulated capitalism" or "capitalism treated as an ideal rather than a tool" as a more specific root cause?

[–] Tedesche@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

No, because it's just not related to capitalism at all. Lemmings love to blame capitalism for everything, and you see it in every bad thing in the world.

[–] Goldholz@lemmy.blahaj.zone -1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Capitalism does though. Atleast to an extend. Car centered city though that kills social connections a lot!

[–] Tedesche@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

No. That is not an effect of capitalism. That is just a fact of rural living. God, Lemmings love to blame capitalism for everything.

[–] Goldholz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 1 hour ago

What made the car industry big? What convinced them to tear down everything and make everything cardepended? Why does the oil and car industry lobby so hard and spread missinfo about public transport and closer living together?

[–] RBWells@lemmy.world 5 points 13 hours ago

Who says this? I am not a cis-het man and have not heard the criticism. I thought it was a known thing? Are you literally hearing it doesn't exist, or is it more like they need to suck it up and/or that they are losers that need to go outside?

If it's the second, that's sexism. That's where it comes from. Illogical ideas about men. Believe it or not, we have not overcome that yet. People have very twisted ideas about how men and women should behave and feel.

[–] rabber@lemmy.ca 15 points 17 hours ago (4 children)

I think there is definitely a male loneliness epidemic but I think there is also an equally bad female loneliness epidemic that nobody talks about enough

[–] madcaesar@lemmy.world 5 points 5 hours ago

I think what's happening is:

40% of men are good people

40% of women are good people

The remaining 20% are pieces of shit that demonize and demean the other sex, which has caused the 80% to become scared and reclusive.

Social media makes it seem like the percentages are flipped but they are not!

The numbers are made up but you get my point.

[–] Preventer79@sh.itjust.works 6 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Modern online incel and radfem movements were created to pit them against each other and prevent them from uniting and creating positive social change.

[–] daggermoon@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Created by whom? I'm actually curious.

[–] EnsignWashout@startrek.website 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I can't prove anything, but:

  • There's evidence that billionaires are taking much more than they earn, and that we (everyone else) would be dramatically better off without them (whether we tax them away or... Come to some other compromise.)
  • Billionaires own most media outlets and social media sites, even those these don't actually make much money compared to everything else the billionaires own. This makes some people ask why they bother...
  • There's a noticable tendency in billionaire owned media to focus daily on divisive topics. The specific topic changes, but the divisiveness continues.
  • There is history of powerful authoritarians investing heavily in divisive propaganda, primarily to break apart and distract groups of people who could overthrow them.

What I have laid out is not proof that today's billionaires are directing their staff to verbally attack minorites at any opportunity.

But it certainly is something to think about next time a vicious rumor about a minority group comes along.

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 0 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Woah, I thought you were talking about a conspiracy of wealthy people that are pitting the sexes against each other. That is interesting and I want to study this some more.

Somehow you ended on wealthy people hating on minorities. Let me make this clear. This happens all the fucking time. Even our POTUS is guilty of this multiple times with instances like the Central Park Five.

I mean the whole anti-woke movement is just a bunch of rich racist assholes pushing a toxic message.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›