this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2025
161 points (94.5% liked)

No Stupid Questions

43071 readers
1661 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The more I hear people talk about it who aren't cis-het men, the more I hear criticism about the concept. But so far, I've only heard people say that it's stupid, that it's not a thing, that it's men's own fault etc. But I've yet to understand where that criticism comes from. I don't want to start a discussion on whether or not it's real or not. I just want to understand where the critics are coming from.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] figjam@midwest.social 2 points 18 minutes ago

I think it has to do with the death of 3rd spaces which used to be an outlet for socialization. But as a man, I'm also not lonely. I have friends and acquaintances and I get to go outside sometimes.

[–] Rooty@lemmy.world 1 points 27 minutes ago

On a related note, I wish we would acknowledge that men socialize different and that guys doing stuff together is therapeutic. Ruminating on emotions can have a negative effect in men, while work therapy can be much effective that talk therapy.

[–] hanrahan@slrpnk.net 6 points 6 hours ago

I have no idea but thought I'd throw out that, as a 58yr old cis white guy I've never been lonely in my life, i have literally no idea what that's like and don't get involved in hypotheses about it all because I have nothing to bring to the debate. I do find human behaviour interesting (and mostly bizzare) though.

The more time I spend with people the more I crave being alone but that's a different thing.

I now live on the edge of a tiny village in the middle of no where Australia and lived in a small cottage off grid in the bush for 10 years previously bit alos loved in an apartment in the sky in a largish city.

One thing I noticed, I found the car free existence ina city bought me into contact with people all the time, even walking you'd see people people and say hello. Stop at a crossing and have a small conversation occasionally etc. i even said hello to women and was never called a pervert ;)

[–] Preventer79@sh.itjust.works 12 points 9 hours ago

Can we please leave gender war slop back at the old site please?

[–] RBWells@lemmy.world 7 points 8 hours ago

Who says this? I am not a cis-het man and have not heard the criticism. I thought it was a known thing? Are you literally hearing it doesn't exist, or is it more like they need to suck it up and/or that they are losers that need to go outside?

If it's the second, that's sexism. That's where it comes from. Illogical ideas about men. Believe it or not, we have not overcome that yet. People have very twisted ideas about how men and women should behave and feel.

[–] Olgratin_Magmatoe@slrpnk.net 35 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

I've seen three sides to it.

Side 1: "boo hoo nobody will fuck me because I don't think other people should have rights"

Side 2: not having strong friendships/relationships because our society is built around capitalism, cars, and social media (this obviously applies across genders, this side therefore is a generalized loneliness epidemic, not a male gendered one)

Side 3: men get socially punished for being vulnerable

In my mind only the second & third side is worth listening to.

[–] Tedesche@lemmy.world 4 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

Side 2 has not actual relevance to the problem itself. These societal tropes are not why men are having a hard time finding women. It’s just a societal trope posing as an explanation.

Side 3 is the only relevant issue. Men are constantly told they need to be more vulnerable or their masculinity is toxic, and yet when they express themselves vulnerably, they’re punished for it.

The issue, as I see it, is that some advocates of the “toxic masculinity” narrative often don’t fully acknowledge the ways in which women can also reinforce those same patterns.

A deeper concern is that many feminists present themselves as speaking on behalf of all women, when in reality most women don’t identify as feminists. As a result, what’s being represented is more of a particular set of progressive gender beliefs than the broader experiences of women in general.

To be clear, I actually agree with many feminist perspectives overall. However, I find that the movement’s messaging is often counterproductive—it can come across as unnecessarily divisive and, at times, dismissive of men. Because of this, even when the arguments are largely valid, they struggle to gain wider support.

[–] Goldholz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 11 minutes ago

Side 2 is very relevant. If you are lonely you get easily into very terrible sides of society and mindsets. I speak from experience. If you dont have a sense of belonging you also have no sense of self, but then come people that tell you to have a part in their group because of race, religion, nationality, or any other extremist reason.

[–] rabber@lemmy.ca 15 points 12 hours ago (4 children)

I think there is definitely a male loneliness epidemic but I think there is also an equally bad female loneliness epidemic that nobody talks about enough

[–] madcaesar@lemmy.world 2 points 33 minutes ago

I think what's happening is:

40% of men are good people

40% of women are good people

The remaining 20% are pieces of shit that demonize and demean the other sex, which has caused the 80% to become scared and reclusive.

Social media makes it seem like the percentages are flipped but they are not!

The numbers are made up but you get my point.

[–] zeropointone@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

Scientists do. They also point out that men and women are affected equally.

[–] Preventer79@sh.itjust.works 4 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Modern online incel and radfem movements were created to pit them against each other and prevent them from uniting and creating positive social change.

[–] daggermoon@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Created by whom? I'm actually curious.

[–] chilicheeselies@lemmy.world 27 points 19 hours ago (18 children)

I think its pretty hypocritical for anyone who isnt a male to have an opinion on the validity of an experience they cant possibly have unless they transitioned.

Its like me having an opinion on have a period.

[–] tree_frog_and_rain@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago

On the other hand, belle hooks', The Will to Change, is one of the most compassionate and understanding takes on the subject.

So she has an opinion on the validity of the experience, and it is that capitalism and patriarchy is alienating for men, just like it is for others. Especially working class men.

Nurturing Our Humanity, co-written by a female author, uses system science and primatology to validate what men experience in domination based societies.

I know your point was more long the lines of critics shouldn't criticize things that they don't understand, but there are a lot of feminists that do understand and have an informed opinion, because they study how these systems of domination affect everyone, not just women.

[–] obsoleteacct@lemmy.zip 18 points 18 hours ago

Particularly when so many trans men who have lived as women previously have come forward to validate how much more isolated men feel.

[–] subtleorbit@sh.itjust.works 9 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I'll disagree a little here.

My wife's had surgeries from men that know waaaaaay more about her period than she does.

That being said, they went to school for a decade and have another decade of experience learning specifically about a topic. They aren't just some random business student that dropped out 2 weeks into semester one and writes their theses via comments.

Small but important caveat. Otherwise 100% agreed. I have no ideas on periods because I'm not a woman or a Dr.

[–] tree_frog_and_rain@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

Yeah I also disagreed, I've read some very compassionate takes on men's situation written by academic feminists.

Bell hooks the will to change for example. Women can be experts on gender, and how systems of domination effect everyone. Men included.

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 32 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

I can only suggest reading some of “The Way We Never Were”. It’s a look at society and how it actually was vs the manufactured versions people today use to weaponize the whitewashed past as some sort of ideal. It’s not a psychological book or a deep analysis of society at all, but one of the things that struck me about it that relate to social circles and how it applies to men in particular is the loss of “the village” and the damage “self reliance” - the isolation of the American Family Unit by making it the Family Vs The World - has done to society and the ability of people to form steady social groups outside of work. This, and the need to constantly change jobs to move ahead financially also keeps people on unsteady ground with relationships.

[–] EnsignWashout@startrek.website 5 points 10 hours ago

the need to constantly change jobs to move ahead financially also keeps people on unsteady ground with relationships.

That's a great point.

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 18 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (7 children)

Good, succinct explanation. There are some people dropping their life stories in this post, which should be a barometer for just how lonely everyone really is.

But yes, this. It's all socio-economic. It's capitalism ruining our world by forcing us to serve the system instead of having a system that serves us. It has been like this a long time, but if unmanaged, allowed to grow and consolidate beyond just the interests of a few companies here and there and allowed to turn into an all-consuming monster that takes away our politics, our social lives, our hopes and dreams, you end up with a very miserable population.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] ThePyroPython@lemmy.world 46 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (2 children)

As a cis het man, the "male loneliness epidemic" is more a collection of symptoms of multiple problems without one source.

Those who claim a single source usually point to women because they're a misogynist grifter looking chasing clout or to sell a scam course / supplement.

So without further ado, here's my non-academic (and probably ill-informed) reckon based on conversations from online and IRL, lived experiences, and perceived societal norms. Have your large pinch of salt on standby.

  1. Both men and women have been socialised that the only emotions men show is anger or laughter. Men have been socialised that the only emotion they can express in front of other men is anger and laughter. This means the amount of emotional support men can use from their support network is limited, they're not practiced on how to deal with them, and either have to figure it out by themselves, be lucky enough to have a friend or partner whom they feel emotionally safe to express these feelings, can afford to seek professional help, laugh the problem off with self-depricating humour to repress the emotion, or turn it into anger usually as a result of succumbing to one of the aforementioned grifters.

Understandably, women have been socialised that if a man is showing emotion then that could turn into frustration and anger and so then they either have to risk taking on unpaid emotional labour or remove themselves from the situation. So sometimes you get this scenario where women want men to be more emotionally open but then recoil when they do because subconscious alarm bells start ringing that "you're in danger" because there's a decent chance that they could be.

Thankfully this is changing with younger generations, but it will take a generation or two.

  1. Male support socialisation is centred around problem solving, not listening. Even if a guy has friends he can lean on emotionally, the conversations are usually focused around fixing the problem rather than providing a listening space and reassurance that those emotions are valid.

This is the main reason I pass off an "I'm fine" to friends and family because they'd try and suggest solutions to the problem rather than just listen.

Again, this is changing in society but these kinds of changes are slow.

  1. Loss of third spaces. This affects everyone, not just men. But these third spaces where people can socialise without being forced to spend money are key for building communities. When people had disposable income or access to lines of credit it didn't matter that there was an expectation that you had to pay for parking, food, drink, ticket(s) for the activity. Now, that's less of an option for many people.

This hasn't improved and will likely only get worse as late stage capitalism squeezes out anything that is unable or refuses to make more and more profit per quarter.

  1. The lack of third spaces has moved friendships, courtship, and dating online. Whilst this has meant many people have made connections (platonic and romantic) that would have gone missed, the big tech companies have realised that anger and loneliness are good for business.

The social networks get far more engagement from posts that make people angry and therefore their advertising revenues increase.

Similarly, the dating monopoly Match Group, has realised that having more men than women on the platform means these men will spend money on these platforms for a chance at matches. So they purposely profile men who are likely to pay for things like "super likes" etc. and do nothing to make the experience more pleasant for women.

This isn't anything new by the way, it's the same reason some clubs make guys pay on the door and women get in for free, and it's the same reason why there's more female sex workers than male sex workers.

Men are willing to pay many and women don't have to, but women have to put up with a lot of entitlement from the men who have paid for matches / to get into the club and be constantly fending off attention from men they don't wish to reciprocate the attention to.

Without third spaces for general socialising, the only place to interact with potential partners is paid and will therefore skew financially in favour of women at the cost of their peace-of-mind.

  1. This is more of a personal sentiment but others might empathise: I don't want to feel like I'm harassing women.

I'm not cold approaching anyone when I go out because I don't want to interrupt their precious free time they get in between the grind of life. I don't want to interrupt them socialising with their friends or be creepy on the dancefloor by getting in their personal space, or even glancing over too much.

So I stay at arms length, avoid eye contact, and only approach or get close if I'm getting multiple very strong signals large enough to land an Airbus A380.

  1. This is definitely just applies to me, but I have exceedingly low self-confidence, self-esteem, and low opinion of myself from a deep rooted depression. That's a straight-up non-starter for trying to be with anyone else because nobody, man or woman, likes an emotional anchor dragging their mood down. I'm working on it but without paying a lot of money for therapy (the NHS waiting list is a joke), I'm stuck trying to work it out myself (see points 1 & 2).

So until I'm fit for socialising in that way, I'm purposely isolating myself in that regard.

Oh and for added flavour, I don't want to be around watching society collapse as the world continues to burn not can I distract myself (or be ignorant enough) to not pay attention to it.

To be honest, right now my mind is telling just to wait for my mother to pass away then withdraw all my money, disappear abroad, burn through it in pure hedonism then off myself once the cash has run out. At least this way I can enjoy a shorter life rather than suffer a longer one.

[–] tree_frog_and_rain@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

There is one source.

I recommend reading nurturing our humanity. Primates have two observable social systems. And they both exist in all societies along a spectrum.

Domination and partnership.

The more domination based a society, the more everybody suffers. Including those higher in the social hierarchy.

Working class men, they are in a strange place because they have hierarchical status based on gender but not based on economic class. This makes it difficult for them to find solidarity with women. And thus more lonely in a system of loneliness.

Communists would blame capitalism of course, and they're not exactly wrong because capitalism is a domination-based system. Marx called this phenomena alienation.

Feminists would blame patriarchy, and again they are not wrong it is a domination-based system.

So on and so forth, but we can take a step back and look at ourselves as apes and see domination is the problem. The will to power.

Buddhism calls this energy Mara, and would call the partnership energy Buddha nature.

It's all the same thing, it's a strategy apes use to relate to each other and survive. Partnership is a better strategy. Assuming your goal is the health of society and the planet rather than personal gain.

[–] HurricaneLiz@hilariouschaos.com 8 points 15 hours ago

I'll be your friend; you can actually discuss things well 💜

[–] shaggyb@lemmy.world -2 points 8 hours ago

Oh my god STOP WITH THE GENDER DEBATES

load more comments
view more: next ›