this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2025
389 points (99.2% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

42032 readers
402 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that.

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating.

-The Community !actuallyinfuriating has been born so that's where you should post the big stuff.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.


-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] NocturnalEngineer@lemmy.world 79 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Estimates show we can sell up to 80% of an individual's visual field before inducing seizures...

[–] Truscape@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 2 weeks ago

Fiction once again being the manual...

[–] gloktawasright@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Can you remind me what this is from?

[–] dustywinter@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 2 weeks ago

Ready Player One

[–] hellfire103@lemmy.ca 64 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] flop_leash_973@lemmy.world 30 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Advertising being allowed to become the dominant monetization method for the internet was a mistake.

I've never seen anything that makes most of its money from advertising that doesn't get worse and worse for it over time as a result. Once you let the advertisers in they will ruin whatever it is they are being allowed to leech off of. Might take 1 year, might take 20, but once they get that foot hold they will run it into the ground because like a billionaire and money, it is never enough.

[–] Two9A@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

So I work at DeviantArt, and we actually saw this in real-time. A few years ago, we added external ads all over the place, and had to add a whole framework to detect "ad-unsafe" works that wouldn't get ads served against them. So we only got ads against a percentage of views, and people were getting pissed at the ads and leaving.

So we tore the ads back out, traffic's recovered, and a focus on providing actual tools for artists to make money through the site has meant we're doing better without ads than we were with ads.

[–] aeternum@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 weeks ago

that's the thing. People will generally support a service they like. If it has ads, most people won't like it and thus won't support it.

[–] rhvg@lemmy.world 24 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

You will soon miss the display banner as it’s at least honest for being an ad. AI will soon have ads weaved in the text itself.

[–] Truscape@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 2 weeks ago

Ublock origin creates an anti-intext filter that filters out text with key phrases indicating an advertisement XD

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] teft@piefed.social 16 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

If you have ublock origin you should be able to use the element picker to block that frame.

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Since using ublock origin I can't remember the last time it didn't automatically hide those now empty elements.

[–] teft@piefed.social 4 points 2 weeks ago

I’ve had to use it a few times on non-english sites but I agree, most of the time ublock handles those automatically.

yeah i'm doing it through the dev console, still annoying.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] pooberbee@lemmy.ml 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

YMMV but switching to vertical tabs might be an improvement. Especially with such a wide screen, and since most websites (especially articles) only use a narrow column in the center, it's been great for me.

huh, interesting thought :D

[–] asdfranger@lemmynsfw.com 8 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

That's why reading mode exists, I use it all the time when I see sites as cluttered as this. Great feature.

(It's the little rectangle icon near the bookmark button, on the navigation bar)

[–] grue@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

They should add a per-site setting to use reading mode by default.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

That's a great idea.

[–] fitgse@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago

Surprisingly safari does, but you should still use Firefox (maybe there is an extension?)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] XLE@piefed.social 8 points 2 weeks ago

Just get a bigger screen. But you can't buy bigger screens these days except as smart TVs or monitors... And those smart screens can detect when you aren't interacting with them and display ads...

[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 2 weeks ago (8 children)

Lmao people still using the internet like this is wild.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] MudMan@fedia.io 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

What resolution are you browsing at? I have a hard time showing that ad at all in my setup, but I'm not even at 4K and I get a HUGE picture of the rocket in question and still see more text than you show in the screenshot. That's what? 720p?

I man, don't get me wrong, ads are annoying, there's a reason why I have so many layers of blocking I couldn't even shut them all off to test this, but you seem to be browsing at what I'd call... legacy resolutions. You'd almost be better off twisting that screen 90 degrees and asking for the mobile version. Or, you know, you could lower the UI scaling in your display settings.

[–] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

i'm at 1080p. the resolution is low but i need it that low because if i increase the resolution to make everything smaller, it's too small for my eyes and it actually hurts my eyes. i need a big font, big icons, everything.

[–] MudMan@fedia.io 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Ah. That's more of an accessibility issue than an advertising issue, then. I imagine even without ads a bunch of modern websites expecting higher resolutions and smaller scaling factors will look cramped.

I was not kidding before, if you have vision problems that don't play well with desktop views, mobile versions of websites tend to be a LOT friendlier to large text sizes. Have you tried setting your browser to a vertical window and calling up the phone version? On Firefox at least you can set the resolution of the phone you're emulating and zoom it all the way up. The setting is buried in the developer tools, but there are tons of tutorials out there (TLDR, press F12, look for the button that looks like a tablet/phone). I'll try to add an image of what it looks like on my device for the site you shared.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 weeks ago

On mobile it can be literally 75% of the screen https://sh.itjust.works/comment/20387049

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago
[–] YurkshireLad@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Can you use uBlock Origin to remove the DIV for the ad? Or is it using randomly generate IDs?

[–] keisatsu@infosec.pub 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

If its predictable at least partly you can hide it with ublock origin and something like ##div[class^="classThatContainAds"]

edit: But I didn't have to, it was removed automatically

[–] Schwim@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 weeks ago

Block the elements with an ad blocker if it's a site you frequent often .

[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Idiocracy - a "bezel" of ads around the screen

[–] abfarid@startrek.website 2 points 2 weeks ago

That sucks. As one of the workarounds I have vertical taskbar and tabs. Our screens have more horizontal space than we usually need.

[–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 weeks ago

only 50%?

those are rookie numbers. I frequently come across sites that block around 75%

[–] 5oap10116@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Guess you need to invest in a vertical 34" monitor

[–] relativestranger@feddit.nl 2 points 2 weeks ago

on the linked page, i get a giant header image and headline, followed by the article text (which accounts for just 15% of the vertical space on my 16:10 screen).

when i scroll as you have, there's no elements glued to the top getting in the way.

(ubo and um both enabled)


[–] lazynooblet@lazysoci.al 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] lazynooblet@lazysoci.al 3 points 2 weeks ago

Haha they never get closed

load more comments
view more: next ›