I feel like this was a very intentional side-effect of the tariff idiocy. I’d bet my next paycheck that Johnson is going to push for fully privatizing the USPS because “it’s no longer able to make a profit” - ignoring the fact that that was never the fucking point.
this post was submitted on 07 Sep 2025
211 points (98.2% liked)
News
32071 readers
2657 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
I don't know if the tariffs were designed to do that, but I'm sure the plan has been to privatize the USPS and many of the functions of the agencies that have been gutted--the goal is to either eliminate or privatize as much of government services as can be done.
Now I’m no economist, so maybe I’m just ignorant here.
But it seems to me that if there’s less stuff being shipped into a country, the people who live in that country are gonna end up having less stuff.
And correct me if I’m wrong, but I seem to recall that one the main goals of an economy is to… checks notes uh… “have stuff”.
Is this the “winning” we were warned about?
You've forgotten supply and demand, if there's less stuff the stuff that's already here increases in value so it's basically the same.
Inflation
As others on HN have discussed and I've written earlier, it's because the policy has come in effect without clarity on how postal carriers should collect the tariff from customers and how to remit to CBP.
There's no calculator or form or instructions on how they might be able to determine the appropriate amount to collect, and so packages may be refused if the CBP's calculation doesn't agree with what the postal carrier's calculation. And finally these "emergency" tariffs have been ruled illegal by the appeals court so it's just too much confusion for postal carriers to figure out at the moment.
Just to say, this is on par with how many dictatorships are run. Spur of the moment decisions and edicts, with no actual protocol or procedures behind them beyond "this is a thing now".
That way when you can't comply, you can be arrested, despite not being able to comply even if you wanted to.
They may decide one day you now need a certain license to practice your profession, but there are no forms or procedures to obtain this license. If you contact the head of that department you are ignored. However, if the govt wants to shut you down at any point (say if you happen to be publicly dissenting) they can officially say it's because you don't have that license. The one that is impossible to obtain.
Of course you continue to work, you've got to earn a living, but now maybe you'll keep your head down so the govt hopefully stays off your back.
I've kept it vague on purpose but it's a real example that I've witnessed in an actual dictatorship. Not that the US was ever perfect, but the past year should be alarming to everyone who isn't a fascist.
And they're still late with all my packages.