this post was submitted on 08 Sep 2025
310 points (95.3% liked)

Games

42083 readers
1830 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Rules

1. Submissions have to be related to games

Video games, tabletop, or otherwise. Posts not related to games will be deleted.

This community is focused on games, of all kinds. Any news item or discussion should be related to gaming in some way.

2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

No bigotry, hardline stance. Try not to get too heated when entering into a discussion or debate.

We are here to talk and discuss about one of our passions, not fight or be exposed to hate. Posts or responses that are hateful will be deleted to keep the atmosphere good. If repeatedly violated, not only will the comment be deleted but a ban will be handed out as well. We judge each case individually.

3. No excessive self-promotion

Try to keep it to 10% self-promotion / 90% other stuff in your post history.

This is to prevent people from posting for the sole purpose of promoting their own website or social media account.

4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

This community is mostly for discussion and news. Remember to search for the thing you're submitting before posting to see if it's already been posted.

We want to keep the quality of posts high. Therefore, memes, funny videos, low-effort posts and reposts are not allowed. We prohibit giveaways because we cannot be sure that the person holding the giveaway will actually do what they promise.

5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

Make sure to mark your stuff or it may be removed.

No one wants to be spoiled. Therefore, always mark spoilers. Similarly mark NSFW, in case anyone is browsing in a public space or at work.

6. No linking to piracy

Don't share it here, there are other places to find it. Discussion of piracy is fine.

We don't want us moderators or the admins of lemmy.world to get in trouble for linking to piracy. Therefore, any link to piracy will be removed. Discussion of it is of course allowed.

Authorized Regular Threads

Related communities

PM a mod to add your own

Video games

Generic

Help and suggestions

By platform

By type

By games

Language specific

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] lmorchard@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

There are mods and cheats for this game already—and they even run on Linux. I turn 50 next month: though I'm still playing, I don't have as much time for gaming as I used to and my reflexes aren't what they were. I haven't entirely removed the challenge with mods, but I feel no shame in tweaking this game to go easier on me and chew up less of my time as punishment for failure. I wish they had these as accessibility options built-in, but I'm fine with hacking it.

Anybody telling me I should "git gud" can pound sand: I'm already good at a bunch of things that get me a paycheck. I play games so I can relax and be terrible at something for fun. I'm certainly not playing for bragging rights.

[–] Binturong@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

If you're not able to commit to learning new strategies and using game mechanics to adapt to a game's difficulty, and experience it as the developers intended, maybe it's not for you. You can always watch a lore video or let's play by other gamers to get the story if that's the goal. This is Dark Souls 2 all over again, and I will personally say as someone who initially hated it, then gave it another chance; When you persist and triumph through grit, the game leaves a lasting impression and sense of accomplishment that you cheat yourself out of with a difficulty slider. That's my favorite game in the series now, which is a deeply unpopular opinion, unsurprisingly.

This debate pops up every now and then and my opinion remains the same, there are plenty of games that aren't meant to be a challenge to choose from. Part of games that are built to be a challenge is being able to reflect on how far you grew in the process, and people hate to hear it but 'git gud' is a real thing for those who believe things worth doing are hard.

[–] itsprobablyfine@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah I think as long as the devs are forward about it no problem. I have plenty of 'hard things' in my day to day life and I'm not looking for more of that in a videogame. Give me a Stardew or Factorio everytime - I want to relax and design things. Different games are for different people and that's a good thing. Any game made to satisfy everyone will almost certainly satisfy no one.

[–] Binturong@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago

Absolutely, it's important to know what you like and want. Hell, lots of people work off vibes and go through phases where certain game types stimulate them, then fall off of those. Like MMOs and online FPS used to be my main thing, now I stick to single player story driven games. I'm not about to go loudly pout about how Stellaris doesn't work for me and should be changed to appeal specifically to my wants, too busy with other games (and life).

[–] Highlandcow@feddit.uk 28 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Sigh this shit again, if it's the creators decision to have a game with finely tuned hard difficulty, so be it, that's the creators creative decision and it should be respected

[–] BilliamBoberts@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

"death of the author" suggests some of the author's intent is lost when a work is consumed by the audience.

[–] Highlandcow@feddit.uk 1 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

To a degree I guess as the audiences own experiences will determine there own interpretation of the work, but in this situation I don't think someone's own experiences is going to impact too much the fact that silksong is hard as nails at points

[–] kilgore_trout@feddit.it 2 points 23 hours ago

Then it's not the developer's fault anymore that the game is hard.
It exists by itself.

[–] EnsignWashout@startrek.website 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I can accept stupid decisions. I don't have to respect them.

[–] chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Respect is a weird word. It seems to have 2 nearly opposite meanings (kind of like literally):

  1. Deep admiration for someone or something for their abilities, qualities, or achievements
  2. Due regard for the feelings, wishes, or rights of others

So the first one implies that respect must be earned. The second implies that everyone must be respected by default (their due regard), thus respect is unearned.

[–] Machinist@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I've always heard:

Respect is given, not earned.

Trust is earned and easy to lose.

Don't confuse politeness with respect.

[–] Highlandcow@feddit.uk 0 points 19 hours ago

No you don't, so you can either mod the game or not play the game right?

[–] maxwells_daemon@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I personally think Outer Wilds should give you the whole lore as an audiobook, not everyone wants to go hunting for clues and reading a bunch of old conversations between dead people in order to figure out what's going on...

[–] lime@feddit.nu 1 points 18 hours ago

as an outer wilds fanatic, i think that would be a great option!

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 6 points 1 day ago

I mean, an audio book of Outer Wilds would be dope.

[–] verdi@feddit.org 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Don't like it, don't buy it. I'm happy for team cherry and their success. It's not for me but I don't resent them that it isn't. This nothing burger discussion is yet another herring designed to drive clicks and traffic off of the work of people who ACTUALLY create something of worth. Modern parasitism at its best.

[–] traceur301@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 23 hours ago

Very well said

[–] DupaCycki@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

In my opinion, the game is not particularly difficult. That is, if you've played through the original Hollow Knight. Which most people haven't. In fact, it looks to me like a lot of people jumping on the hype don't have too much experience with metroidvanias and soulslikes.

It's a sequel, so intended to be played after the original. Why do we care what people who haven't played the first game think?

[–] pressanykeynow@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

It's difficult for me and I like it. I played Hollow Knight but didn't finish it because it was too frustrating late game. Silksong to me is not frustrating because difficulty is mainly in figuring out how to pass the challenge, not doing reflexes which I don't have. Most of the things I heard people complain about are solved by not rushing around with failing strategy but by thinking what the game recently suggested you to do for this particular encounter.

I actually think bringing in Hollow Knight experience aka "I already know everything" might be the reason why some people are frustrated. Like I heard a person who claimed to get all the achievements in HK complain that the second phase of one boss is terrible because they spent a hundred tries to dodge all the projectiles while you can just stand at the corner of the arena where non of them will hit you and use the tools this game gives you to win the fight.

[–] SlippiHUD@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago

My biggest complaint is the sheer lack of rewards when I finish a fight. Give me any currency.

I have spent so much of this game broke, unable to buy the things I need to advance any side plots.

I'm currently stuck on the fight for the Music in the top left of the citadel. The double boss at the end is brutal. But because no enemy in that fight drops monster parts, I have to quit to grinding it to go grind more materials to build equipment, despite having slain 20+ enemies each run.

[–] HollowNaught@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm about 10 hours into silksong and it's amazing, don't get me wrong. But the majority of the boss fights seem... cheap?

Like, their difficulty doesn't come from their various attacks, or their environment. Instead, it usually comes from the fact that they do double damage, or the fact that they spam the same two attacks over and over way too quickly, or the fact that they can do the same add summon three times in a row and make what was a controllable situation practically impossible

Now, I've 112% the OG hollow knight and beaten true radiance, so I'm not against difficult boss fights. In fact I relish the feeling of learning their moves and patterns after every single death

But when the moves are "ram into wall. Then ram into wall again" it becomes incredibly annoying

[–] Harrk@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Some of the boss fights felt amazing once you start learning their attack patterns, but then others were just... lacking. The savage fly one comes to mind. It wasn't particularly a difficult boss itself. But when it summoned ads, it became a fight around rng. It wasn't a fun fight at all. Felt like the devs realised it was too easy and chucked in ads then left it there.

Separately, why on earth the boss doesn't receive damage for slamming down on the spiky enemy when its spikes are deployed... Missed opportunity!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] EarlGrey@discuss.tchncs.de 31 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (7 children)

Runbacks are a lame attempt at artificially increasing difficulty. I'll happily die on that hill. I love difficult games, but there is a fine line between frustration and difficult.

Elden Ring (at least all the bits I played through) and Sekiro absolutely nailed it. None of the run backs were particularly egregious, and it let me really focus on experimenting and learning to feel out the difficult fights. Celeste is another good example. I have dropped hours on some of the later levels trying to master them, but never once got frustrated.

Hollow Knight I never finished because I got stuck on a boss and the runback was just way too long and annoying. I loved everything else about the game and want to finish it eventually.

Edit: I think they have their place as "mods" that you could enable to increase difficulty, and i'd actually probably enjoy it that way. Just designing the game around them is where i draw the line.

[–] Nikls94@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Unpopular opinion but I like boss runbacks.

To me it feels like "if you don’t survive the journey, you’re too weak for the boss itself" it brings me down and makes me calmer until I reach the boss.

[–] pressanykeynow@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

I like them because I will think what I did wrong, not just going to do that wrong thing again until I get lucky with my wrong strategy.

[–] syreus@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I like them because it forces you to try to salvage a fight instead of just conceding after a bad start. The time spent getting to the boss is investment you don't want to waste.

I think this is really just an issue of the tools and abilities not being inherently linked to the related bosses.

FYI quickhop attacking is faster than ground combos and you can weave in the trio dagger throws when you are dodging away from close attacks. Also your attack will negate enemy attacks weapon hitbox(but you still have to dodge bodily contact). The poison tool upgrade is overbalanced and makes a lot of fights a joke.

[–] wols@lemmy.zip 2 points 20 hours ago

This is a really good point.

I've also found myself messing up the run back but committing to the fight anyway with a few masks down. You can either heal back up by breaking the cocoon, or practice starting the fight low and keep the silk for later (one of the best changes from the first game IMO is making the cocoon an asset in contrast to the ghost that would harass you).

Another aspect is the run back itself. When you struggle a lot with a boss (as I often do), you will have to do the run back so many times that you passively start getting better at traversing the map. And even if the specific combos you used on the boss itself don't necessarily translate to other bosses, the movement skills likely will keep being useful.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 40 points 2 days ago (6 children)

People forgetting that when you ran out of lives you used to have to go back to the start of the whole game.

[–] EnsignWashout@startrek.website 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

People forgetting that when you ran out of lives you used to have to go back to the start of the whole game.

We remember. It was bullshit back then. It's still bullshit now.

Edit: I beat many of those games on three lives. It was still some bullshit.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›