this post was submitted on 08 Sep 2025
566 points (98.8% liked)

HistoryPorn

7337 readers
2 users here now

COMM MOVED TO !historyphotos@piefed.social

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 27 points 2 weeks ago

Just a reminder that the comm has moved to !historyphotos@piefed.social

[–] boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net 92 points 2 weeks ago (13 children)

They literally had this but fucked up the climate, future investions, infrastructure and pensions anyways

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 36 points 2 weeks ago

They got rich by doing all that. Well their kids.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] e8CArkcAuLE@piefed.social 65 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

how was this possible? was there a deflation?
or was it the specificity of the product sugar that was made so expensive due to wartime restrictions on maritime trade?

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 145 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

The sign says "O.P.A. Ceiling Prices," so WWII-era price controls were probably the subject.

[–] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 88 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Between taxing the wealthy, nationalisation of key companies and assets, and this, seems like they had some really good policies back then.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 81 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Okay, but what about their freedom?

If you don't have the right to price gouge, how long until the government steals all your other liberties?

Sure, you'll enjoy a higher quality of life. But is it really worth it, knowing that the mega-wealthy will suffer?

[–] tenchiken@anarchist.nexus 11 points 2 weeks ago

Gonna have to say, had me in the first half there.

[–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 54 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 103 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Its so funny how the US despises socialism when its best economic time period had full on government controlled industry production and pricing requirements.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 85 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

the US despises socialism

Took a good 40 years of far right propaganda, red scares, bigotry, and conspiracy mongering to get from FDR's New Deal to Reagan Economics.

American fascists poisoned the minds of their children and their grandchildren in order to reach this point.

[–] hector@lemmy.today 11 points 2 weeks ago

American fascists have been used as tools by the rich to undo the gains of the new deal, and ultimately the gains of the Enlightenment to bring us back into some type of feudalism where owing money leads to Virtual slavery. And the entire system is fixed so you cannot avoid owing money to somebody.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TragicNotCute@lemmy.world 36 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

We hate socialism so much we bought part of Intel.

[–] Septimaeus@infosec.pub 8 points 2 weeks ago

I actually support government/public shareholding. It’s a natural path to UBI that maps effective taxation directly to shareholder value (prohibiting tax loopholes) and reflects public backing of commercial entities proportionately with public stake.

Honestly it’s absurd that major stimulus initiatives proceed without requiring public equity in return for the funds. And that’s doubly true for corporations that would crater otherwise, since such a bailout would then result in a controlling stake. Public centralization via such an acquisition would be logical for any entity that’s “too big to fail.”

I’m sure this administration’s motivations are corrupt and we should be wary, but the precedent itself is progressive IMHO.

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

That’s facism

[–] TempermentalAnomaly@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago

America was great when it was communist.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] e8CArkcAuLE@piefed.social 4 points 2 weeks ago

i was so busy looking at the prices that my adhd brain didn’t register the opa part! thanks for the explanation

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 15 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

In addition to the WWII rations and OPA stuff that others have mentioned, there was a fair amount of general deflationary pressure during the Great Depression in the 1930s.

I haven't looked at what happened to sugar specifically.

[–] hector@lemmy.today 4 points 2 weeks ago

Later on, after the Cuban Revolution I know we subsidized sugar partly out of spite for Cuba. That would not be at play here though.

[–] ordnance_qf_17_pounder@reddthat.com 44 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I wonder why, its not like any major events happened around 1918 and 1945

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 45 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

nope, just the invisible hand of the free market!

[–] SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml 11 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I still find it crazy that this modern-quality video clip + set is from the 1930s

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Inflation is caused by the Wizard of Oz.

[–] Iheartcheese@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago
[–] cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 19 points 2 weeks ago

it only took a market crash and two world wars.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 18 points 1 week ago

I'm still mad that we measure inflation as the price of goods instead of the money supply and people have the audacity to say greed doesn't play a role.

[–] TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Today that list would be 16 euros or something.

[–] khannie@lemmy.world 17 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Yeah you're close. Ball park for Lidl where I do most of my shopping:

5lbs of sugar €5

Bread €1

2 quarts of milk €2.50

6 oranges €2.50

Oatmeal €1.80

Coffee €4

[–] hector@lemmy.today 7 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

In the US bread is 3 even at aldi, 5 at big box stores at label.

[–] khannie@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago (7 children)

That's crazy money. Name brand bread in a normal supermarket is around 3 USD here and I resent paying it.

Honestly I'd be buying a bread machine at those prices but we've a lot in the house so go through a lot of bread for school lunches etc.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Tetragrade@leminal.space 13 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Man I wish i lived back in 1940 times and my husband beat me for having polio

[–] ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online 4 points 1 week ago (4 children)

And back then your therapist was also your bartender.

[–] blarghly@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Same as it ever was...

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Can we get something like that again, please?

BTW in 1918 1.34$ was around 31 bucks today, and in 1945 it was around 24.5 or so.

[–] BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

To be clear, you're requesting a great depression?

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 13 points 1 week ago

Can we just have the bit where speculators got wiped out?

Let's have more purchasing power WITHOUT a depression! BTW 1945 was just when WW2 was going to end, and during WW2 the US and Canadian economies were booming because they were far away from the fighting and everyone who wasn't fighting could get a job helping those that did. So people were working.

[–] skyin7@feddit.org 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net 4 points 2 weeks ago

Or how I like to call it, 1+2 milk

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Unfortunately this comes about from a depression which is when most folks have zero of close enough to it to be zero. then suddenly bread goes for a few cents because most people cannot get enough cents together to buy bread and those with money don't need anymore bread they have plenty.

[–] Corn@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It comes from price ceilings. When there's no capitalist making money for doing nothing, and their buddies in overplayed management positions making money doing almost nothing, you can produce sugar real cheap.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›