this post was submitted on 09 Sep 2025
494 points (99.2% liked)

Microblog Memes

9140 readers
2867 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

article

toot

easily contact your MEP: https://fightchatcontrol.eu/

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 7 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

I'm just so tired of it all. At this point I would not be surprised about ending up in prison a decade from now for using encrypted communication.

[–] AllToRuleThemOne@lemmy.world 4 points 7 hours ago (1 children)
[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

It's ironic to use a meme from a movie depicting a fascistic government, to protest against a fascistic measure.

[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

I'm not an EU citizen yet, and as a non-citizen brown man, i doubt the MEP would listen to me. How can I do my part anyway?

[–] cows_are_underrated@feddit.org 6 points 8 hours ago

Thanks for sharing the link to contact the MEPs. Thats actually very useful.

[–] PlutoniumAcid@lemmy.world 101 points 16 hours ago (4 children)

This is the worst thing in ages. I'm 50+, very good with IT, and I understand that we MUST act against it.

But I'm tired, boss.

Surrounded by lemmings and sheep that love Facebook and WhatsApp. People are stupid. I don't have the energy to fight so much ignorance and stupidity - willful or otherwise.

[–] rekabis@programming.dev 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Just a few years older, in IT as a career, and absolutely the same.

You know what though, when encryption was first developed in the form of pgp, the whole point was that it was to sidestep the government being able to spy on you.

Perhaps we just need to accept that we need to take encrypted communication into our own hands and not rely on messaging apps to protect us

[–] rumschlumpel@feddit.org 50 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Also, they keep trying. You fight it one year, they're back the next. Extremely undemocratic.

[–] brachypelmide@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 hours ago

Precisely. You need to keep winning, while they just need to win once. Would love it if repeat offenders like these would just stop being considered entirely after being rejected multiple times.

[–] DegenerationIP@lemmy.world 18 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

I'm overwhelmed by this stupidity and collective ignorance all the time. Not just in data privacy regards.

Some days I just want to give up and say "screw it". But damn, I can't. And a lot of others will not stop. If you do, thats alright, it is okay to rest.

[–] PlutoniumAcid@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago

Thank you, kind stranger.

[–] 0x0@lemmy.zip 6 points 11 hours ago

The provided link will let you contact MPs with just a few lazy clicks.

[–] biotin7@sopuli.xyz 3 points 9 hours ago

Also get those MPs imprisoned

[–] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 20 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (5 children)

Ok how do they plan to enforce that?

By banning HTTPS at the ISP level?

Edit: and then how do they enforce GPDR? Because you better believe everyone and their mother is going to snoop on every communication made.

[–] Zwiebel@feddit.org 4 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

By forcing Whatsapp Signal etc to implement backdoors

[–] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 3 points 8 hours ago

Signal wouldn't, or if it did, it would be labeled as such as an insecure fork for EU conpliance only and make that fork stale immediately.

[–] IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world 9 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Blocking HTTPS would be frighteningly hilarious. My employer is one of thousands of websites that utilizes HSTS, which tells web browsers to use HTTPS. Our implementation of HSTS, like lots of banks etc. is also listed with HSTSpreload, which means browsers like chrome will only ever use HTTPS with our site.

[–] tgxn@lemmy.tgxn.net 3 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

What if they just do MITM with a Trusted root? Does HSTS provide a method to do cert pinning?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

By banning HTTPS at the ISP level?

I think you might not be aware of it but big institutions like governments and such can basically already circumvent HTTPS encryption by supplying fake root certificates and forcing the ISP to redirect traffic through their own servers.

That is why End-to-End encryption is such a big deal. Because it cannot be circumvented by the government alone. If done right (proper key exchange), it cannot be broken by anyone but the legitimate recipients. The way WhatsApp does it today, Meta could technically break it too, though i'm not sure whether they do.

[–] Jenseitsjens@lemmy.world 4 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

That's not necessarily very easy. These certs would have to show up in public certificate transparancy logs for most browsers to accept them. If this happens on a government scale it would surely get noticed, though the question remains what you're left to do if the government forces it anyways...

See https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Certificate_Transparency section "Mandatory certificate transparency"

[–] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

not necessarily very easy

admittedly, but i still assume that the CIA could do it if it tried.

edit: thanks for the link though, this seems very interesting :D

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Njos2SQEZtPVRhH@piefed.social 25 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

Any Dutch people here? Follow nerdvote.nl, to help decide who to vote for this election. They are suggesting technical minded people should unite and form a block in elections, so that parties will try to cater to us. If you want our vote, come up with plans an proposals to create digital sovereignty and freedom. As a member of PVDA/GL I am probably voting Barbara Kathmann , as she is fighting for digital sovereignty. Without preferential votes she probably won't make it in so your preferential vote matters!

[–] mr_satan@lemmy.zip 4 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

In many cases this could be argued as unconstitutional.

[–] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

In germany, it's not technically unconstitutional (i checked last week because i assumed it should be) but it definitely feels like it should be unconstitutional. After WW2, there was a consensus to not surveil your own population, and this is a very important constraint to keep in mind.

[–] Zwiebel@feddit.org 4 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

Where did you check that? The Vorratsdatenspeicherung has been ruled unconstitutional twice for example

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

According to the EU constitution?

[–] Gladaed@feddit.org 33 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

This would not break encrypted messaging but forbid it.

[–] thespcicifcocean@lemmy.world 10 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

What if I just transmit a bunch of random ass digits to someone?

[–] derpgon@programming.dev 12 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

And, now listen, what if the someone has a bunch of these numbers in his backpocket, and by complete chance, when added to your number, it gives a number that might just mean something.

[–] REDACTED@infosec.pub 5 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

This for whatever reason made me think of a system that works similar to blockchain and bitcoin scrambling. Take a message, split it in many parts, each gets sent thru different servers, but using some alghorithm, it all connects together in the end, without actually encrypting the message.

[–] dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 4 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Honestly, stenography is probably the only way to achieve privacy and evade detection. A "one-time pad" would also be a solid layer of security to apply on top of that. Splitting up traffic would buy a little security if you funnel it through wildly different services owned by different corporations and ISPs, more or less requiring coordination with each other or through another party (police/government) to puzzle things together. But you still need to disguise the payload (stenography) or it will stand out.

Inscrutable traffic contents can get flagged, and the destination ip:port can be pretty damning metadata (depending on who's watching). The only way to make any of this work without looking like typical SSL traffic is to hide data inside what looks like typical traffic.

I'll add that with AI in the mix, profiling and anomaly detection is only going to get worse. Plus, you're trying to evade and adversary whose movements and strategies are not completely knowable ahead of time.

[–] MyNameIsIgglePiggle@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Probably a really good use for llms would be to provide plausible looking strings that can securely transmit a public key

Edit:

Sun senator house — ruler sun arena amber army amber army. Bard 3 noble zone ancient citizen 1 youth colosseum 2 empire army. Arena amber amber dominus augustus quiet augustus bronze army arena augustus bronze. Amber quiet caesar 5 hill wine zone 9 caesar jewel 1 guard. 2 dinner 7 mosaic justice farmer 2 quiet echo 0 jar poet. Amber honor 8 king xiphos poet 5 dove quest justice forum plus. Yarn 9 road 2 divine 8 7 market zenith 8 keep urn. Poet 6 wall trader echo xenia law use 6 plus rome battle. Table nymph 2 soldier zeal temple ancient jar eagle market senator 1. Quill kettle 0 journey olive 6 victory honor road jewel temple colosseum. North zodiac man soldier xiphos 0 parade house jar 8 kettle 2. Bard zone xenia grain 5 jester land 6 caesar 5 parade quiet. Hill ruler poet 8 feast zeal chariot 8 quarry nymph prince lamp. Hill wheat parade plus 6 ox xenia 2 empire caesar farmer kettle. Keen 8 yard ox lamp temple hill quarry woman wine mare 2. Lion 6 rome 8 mosaic 5 yarn ox xylos citizen night god. Parade 5 citizen 8 hero youth slash hill scribe urn nymph gladiator. Year xylos xylos market rome jar gladiator noble bread zeal wheat 4. Dominus plus feast quarry justice colosseum land victory yard mare jewel quiet. Use house wall table yarn 2 use amber xeric river road night. Hymn 8 noble yarn jester war scribe trader 2 table town quill. Zeal hero zone 2 mosaic 4 wine coin grain 3 xeric colosseum. 6 legion hymn law 0 war rome quill feast valor hero 0. Wine 5 dinner king 8 9 ancient zeal 0 plus 8 arena. Imperial use nymph 9 2 quarry keep jester temple citizen divine mount. Xiphos 1 man 8 lion voice 5 wine wheat zenith table forum. Man 2 temple xenia mount dove zigzag hymn xeric 4 torch 7. Mare 2 officer feast officer zodiac 2 yard palace 2 4 colosseum. Lamp 4 brave trader vine quill xystus caesar jar 8 justice guard. 5 quest drum queen 8 zodiac 9 year dinner river umbra 7. Arena plus utterance 0 mosaic dominus quarry honor dinner echo man. Officer at evening xystus ancient man pillar legion evening.

My key:

ssh-rsa AAAAB3NzaC1yc2EAAAADAQABAAABAQC5hWz9Cj1g2D7mJf2qE0jPaH8KxP5dQjF+Y9R2d87m Z8kUp6wTeXlU6+rbTn2SztajEms1QK0jO6vHRjTcnZmSx0pHj8K2BZXG5jL6C5pqhrP8fzC8QnPLhw P+6oX2EcfKk8yoLthQwWm2L6R8M5YoxCnGp5c8hy/hsUNgYXxmrJGnBZW4d+fQjClvYMJqUHwTY2u AxrRnh8NYJwsT2TtQZhZ2m4wCG3Xc6LhL0WrqFvh0w5Dk89Az0+8aIuN92qkjtcdMX1m8lV5wWZTf m2txmDZhX4T7M2OFOz2yP24Cl4BTVQXcJ8jG5qDQ8Z9yDRu7A+U0MdQH demo@example

I propose we make a new cipher alphabet which is more natural language and llm friendly in order to allow a more natural encoding, make it non case sensitive, no special characters, and have no header or footer, so that it is less detectable

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Broken_Orange_Juice@lemmy.world 10 points 15 hours ago (5 children)

Aren't Europeans supposed to be the good guys?

the EU commission is absolutely dumb and definitely not on the side of the people though. by the way, it's also not democratically elected.

[–] Barbarian@sh.itjust.works 32 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

There are no "good guys" or "bad guys" in geopolitics, just shades of grey. On quite a few topics, the EU is better, but any government is capable of doing stupid shit.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] 0x0@lemmy.zip 6 points 11 hours ago

The EU's been veering right for a few years now.

[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

No, the EU is just as much liberal capitalism as the US. They have a better social safety net and looked better in comparison.

[–] rumschlumpel@feddit.org 9 points 14 hours ago

The competition is pretty weak.

load more comments
view more: next ›