this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2025
76 points (94.2% liked)

Canada

10426 readers
768 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


πŸ’΅ Finance, Shopping, Sales


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

For the 'Carney is basically just Poilievre' Crowd, a look at Poilievre's proposed legislation (note: this from about a month ago)

I've seen this take that Carney is just as bad as Poilievre more than a few times. And while Carney may not be as Green as some had hoped for but my goodness, the difference between him and Poilievre is staggering.

Figured it's worth posting the legislation that Poilievre put forward in August which includes removing pipeline regulations, scrapping the West Coast oil-tanker ban; killing the industrial carbon tax; eliminating the electric vehicle mandate and reversing the single-use plastics ban.

top 40 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] mp3@lemmy.ca 14 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Please keep the original title when posting an article. You can put your commentary on the post's body.

[–] MyBrainHurts@lemmy.ca 10 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] mp3@lemmy.ca 6 points 3 days ago

Thank you :)

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 8 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Their brain hurts. Give hoser a break. πŸ˜„

Begum, A. M., & Mobin, M. A. (2025). A machine learning approach to carbon emissions prediction of the top eleven emitters by 2030 and their prospects for meeting Paris agreement targets. Scientific Reports, 15(1), Article 19469. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-04236-5

Government of Canada. 2025. Greenhouse gas emissions. https://www.canada.ca/en/environment-climate-change/services/environmental-indicators/greenhouse-gas-emissions.html

NASA. 2025. Methane. https://climate.nasa.gov/vital-signs/methane/?intent=121

Papies, E. K., Nielsen, K. S., & Soares, V. A. (2025). Health psychology and climate change: time to address humanity’s most existential crisis. Health Psychology Review, 19(3), 463–493. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2024.2309242

Popovski, V. (2024). Climate Change as an Existential Threat: Translating Global Goals into Action. Environmental Policy and Law, 54(2–3), 127–139. https://doi.org/10.3233/EPL-239025

[–] threeonefour@piefed.ca 33 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It's honestly crazy that we saw the US do this literally months ago with Trump and Harris and somehow no lesson was learned.

[–] blindsight@beehaw.org 18 points 3 days ago

Poilievre said the Sovereignty Act would also include his campaign promise to exempt people from capital gains tax when they reinvest the proceeds of an investment in a Canadian company.

This one is insane. The 1% would accumulate so much more wealth, tax free, with this. JFC.

[–] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 22 points 3 days ago (1 children)

No, he is a banker, and all his solutions are neoliberal.

PP is fascism light, like those drinks that assure you artificial sweeteners are harmless but cause cancer long term.

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

Yah which ones.

[–] ProgrammingSocks@pawb.social 21 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Yes, we don't need to exaggerate, Carney's neoliberal austerity doesn't have to be fascism to be overall bad for us.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 14 points 3 days ago

We do not choose the ideal; we choose the best from the choices we're given.

There is no liberal so bad that a conservative cannot make it worse.

[–] unbanshee@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 3 days ago

My problem is that poor governance from the lesser of two evils almost inevitably results in a swing towards the greater of two evils.

It just delays the worst, doesn't avert it.

We had other options, as uninspiring as they may have been. Now we're locked into a FPTP two-party death spiral, and both parties bear the responsibility for it; the cons for being unrepentant monsters, and the libs for pandering to the right and to capital at the expense of the best interests of the majority of the electorate when they could and should be choosing policy directions that don't perpetuate ballooning inequality and the decay of the social safety net.

Carney in particular watched (and to some extent, presided over) decades of just this kind of decline in the UK, he absolutely knows what his policy directives are going to do to this country.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 14 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, but saying that shows you're a bigger leftist than the next poster. Who cares if it's not factually accurate? /s

[–] MyBrainHurts@lemmy.ca 6 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Pssssh, amateurs, actions speak louder than words! For example, whenever I'm on public transit and we're about to turn ~~right~~ not Left, I stand up and demand the driver instead make three Left turns instead. Admittedly, this has been difficult on trains but it's the effort that counts.

Edit: formatting

[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)