Wtf is that show supposed to be? After watching the clip, it just seems like a bunch of self righteous Republicans interrupting each other with no actual discussion.
this post was submitted on 25 Sep 2025
161 points (97.6% liked)
politics
26108 readers
3924 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
That is every Conservative talk show. It's either a Russian TV style circle jerk or a 1 hour argument with commercial breaks and a host who's mic levels are higher than his guests on purpose
I've heard those shows called the Talking Heads, but in this case I guess that all of the heads are on the same Ettin?
“The Contentious Ettin” sounds like a podcast I’d listen to
The Contentious Ettin was literally a random encounter I ran. The only thing the two heads agreed on was trying to kill the party.
Tucking that one away for future use lol
Dancing on the head of a pin
the view for consecutives but worse than it and much lower budget
Fuckin candy ass snowflake
The entire Right
TFW political discourse has devolved to a level where criticizing Netanyahu is equivocated with antisemitism. No one, and I mean no one would accuse you of hating Kyrgystanis for critiquing Sadyr Japarov. No one. Michaels couldn't even participate in the debate without getting offended and making a dramatic exit, it's fucking pathetic.
I grew up with narcissists who understood the theater of arguing. If you act offended enough, there's a good chance you can convince bystanders the other person did something wrong. But you have to seize the narrative. That part is already mostly done, so all it takes to fan flames is to throw tantrums.
That's less than encouraging, and my condolences on your first 20-30 years dealing with that bullshit.
The Biggest Loser lady??
Rare (lately) Ana Kasparian W.
why has ana gone crazy
More or less, last I heard she was trying to grift the right. But don't take my word on it, I don't really give a damned.
never go full daily show
What does this mean
lol i meant colbert report
Seems like she went all in on the grift
WTF did the furries do? Why are they involved in all this at all?
Kirk's shooter had some shell casings with what was originally a furry meme etched onto them, but that phrase had been co-opted by groypers and transvestigators and is more likely to be evidence that the shooter did it for the lulz than that they were furry.
The furry community is very tight-knit, if it was one of us then we'd have figured out who the shooter was before the cops did. The only connection here is that Republicans have been trying to make the existence of furries into another front in their culture war.
He said that the engravings were a meme.
I mean of course they were. People seem to think he had them engraved specifically for this, guarantee he just did that to a bunch of bullets for hunting or whatever because he thought it would be funny
Maybe the Fbi found a hair.
The video clip. Tried to post it directly here but file is too big
removed X link
Edit: thanks @CubitOom@infosec.pub
doing the lords work +1
TY!
You go Ana!
Isn’t she a conservative now?
Yeah, but at least she seems to still be on the right side of the fascist apartheid state issue.
Not saying that it absolves her from all the other bullshit she's been spouting since her and Cenk's heel turn, but it's something 🤷
I mean, she was very much spewing shit during the election that the whole project 2025 stuff was complete hyperbole and not going to happen.
In fairness to her she also did explicitly acknowledge she was wrong and apologize, but at the same time it takes real skill to be that stupid to begin with.
I honestly am much more sympathetic to cenk. I don't think he's being cynical I think he's just wrong but earnest
I never got into them as I can't take someone seriously who spent years pushing for idiocy. Its like I used to be stupids but now im smarts. Even if I agree with the particular segment or points it just feel like they went the one way and did not do well so just flipped and got traction so stuck with it until they don't see profit and then will try flipping again.
Oh no, when did she become a conservative? I lay watched them around 2020 and she was left on most things and a liberal other times.
It started a couple years ago when she went on a bizarre transphobic tirade, against the use of trans inclusive language. From there, it's just been a long downward spiral.
The whole reason she's on this conservative talk show is because she's been making this rightward pivot
I used to watch them during Trump 1.0 and I enjoyed her too, but it was a little too much for me, but I remember seeing videos of her last year being a bootlicker. Not sure when it happened.
Was that conservative mindset to you?
Ask MTG.
Zero sense.
Nah, she's still progressive. She and Cenk are trying to build bridges with the right on the things we can agree on. They're doing good.
Why would TYT have a fascist on their show?
Ana Kasparian
Clown