You're not using your bed right now. Are you letting a homeless person sleep in it?

What the fuck is with this thread being overrun with dickheads? Is this the breaking point, has Lemmy reached critical mass?

The image represents how capitalism uses the myth of scarcity. There's a bed there, and there's a human being sleeping on the ground. The lie is that there isn’t enough to go around; that somebody has to go without.

That's bullshit. We have everything.

I don’t get it… is that store supposed to let people in to sleep on their beds?

Guy can't even take a nap without being abused by propagandists.

I've always pointed to the fact that over half the food in the US is left to rot until it ends up in a landfill yet food insecurity is rampant in the richest country in the world.

When they send police to arrest people, including homeless people and parents trying to feed their kids, for dumpster diving behind grocery stores and some grocery stores now literally shred or pour bleach on the packages of still sealed food that they throw away, maybe it's a sign that society needs a pretty major paradigm change on how goods and services should be distributed.

When police arrest people for giving homeless people food, maybe we should question who they're really here to serve and protect.

Wasteful is the wrong word. Waste implies this is some kind of poor planning, inefficiency or oversight.

Capitalism truly is all about efficiency, literally at the expense of basic humanity.

This isn't unintentional waste, this is intentional separation of the poor from resources. This is intentional artificial scarcity. The fact that many are literally separated from and thus lack a bed (or a roof, or food, etc) is what makes a bed a more valuable commodity for those with enough capital to purchase one from the private owner class through vendors like this one. If basic twin beds were publically available or subsidized, it would lower the capital value and profit potential of the swankier beds. And that is something the owners won't tolerate.

Under unrestrained market capitalism, there need to be people dying in the streets, otherwise people won't appreciate the capital value of purchasing what they need to live.

We Americans cast our sub-optimal capital batteries out to die of exposure. This is by design. If, as an American not born into wealth, you refuse or are unable to generate value for the owners directly, you will still have an important economic function you will be forced to fulfill: a capitalism scarecrow, meant to scare the wage slaves back to work on Monday, making money for the owners in exchange for minimal subsistence.

We could house and shelter all our fellow Americans, it isn't a matter of resources or space. We choose not to, and we also antagonize our powerless homeless as the villains selfishly lowering our property values by continuing to exist while destitute. We don't, because market capitalism incentivises cruelty for profit, and we refuse to reign it in for fear of slowing its self serving growth/metastasis at the expense of the society it is supposed to serve.

This is an image of our economy's and society's ~~waste~~ intential, greed incentivised cruelty. We Americans are a cruel people far more interested in getting more than our neighbors than entertaining being part of a society.

Lemmy try not to blame capitalism challenge/s

You know what's so sad about something like this?

The conservative seeing this will opt to blame the individual. This conservative will most frequently espouse themselves to be a Christian nonetheless. "Jesus-like" in aspirations and idolatry.

And yet, they'll have the knee-jerk reaction to this image that is saying, "Well they put themselves in that position."

"It wasn't the happenstance of birth locations,."

"It wasn't the culmination of external forces and externalities building to this moment."

"It wasn't the fact that their life was harder than my own."

"Or perhaps my life was hard and I'm using the survivor-bias fallacy to justify kicking the ladder out from under me."

The conservative believes there are lesser people who deserve what they get coming. It's seemingly incomprehensible to them that we humans are quite literally of the same species, and that you must come to the conclusion one of two possibilities: Either (1) We are all a blank slate from the start and thus products of our environment. Nurture comprising the vast majority of what influences us. Which means those left out on the streets; those who take drugs in an ideal state of mind don't want to be there, but are already too far broken from past experiences to reconcile their immediate choices (and need saved; protected; rehabilitated by the same outside forces that put them there in the fist place). Or (2) It is genetic, which means there is a predisposition incompatible with the inherently-flawed system we've built for ourselves. They're a circle in a square system, and it's thus just the same not their choice. And so again, the system should adapt and accommodate them just the same to promote a healthier society overall.

THAT would be more Jesus-like. Not the lazy cop-out that casts them off as degenerates. Such people lack empathy and cannot comprehend the bigger picture.

The real capitalist crime is that a mattress sells for such ridiculous prices that they charge thousands of dollars for a chunk of foam and some springs.

Most mattress stores print money, and only need to make 4 sales a month to stay in business.

They are insanely overpriced. Why doesn't everyone just buy cheap beds from Costco and IKEA?!

Sacrificing the needs of the many for the wants of the few.

Grossly oversimplified. Dumb meme that adds nothing substantive

Who tf need 8 pillows of various sizes on their bed?

In a wasteful system there'd be some factory churning out obsolete mattresses to fill a warehouse that nobody needs because there's a quota to be met.

Meanwhile the workers can't eat enough because resources were allocated by a bureaucrat last year who's got no personal incentive to see either system work smoothly.

But the shareholders need to be able to extract a return in return for no work - we couldn't give others a shot at dignity.