So it bothers you when people vocalize their question marks, eh?
Ask Lemmy
A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions
Rules: (interactive)
1) Be nice and; have fun
Doxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them
2) All posts must end with a '?'
This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?
3) No spam
Please do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.
4) NSFW is okay, within reason
Just remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com.
NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].
5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions.
If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.
6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online
Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.
Partnered Communities:
Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu
I literally dislike it whenever anyone uses the word literally when they clearly mean figuratively.
Its just extra syllables to lie to me.
There's this process in language where intensifiers
words that amplify the strength of the meaning of the rest of the phrase
tend to become used in areas that they aren't really truly appropriate in and thus "weaken" in meaning.
So, for example, "awesome" once truly meant "awe-inspiring", but it's been used enough in weaker senses the past several decades here in California that it doesn't really mean that any more. It just means "very good" now.
I don't think that the Brits do that with "awesome"
or at least not as much
but they like to use "colossally" in a similar way.
The above Wikipedia link has a list of intensifiers, including "literally", and you can probably recognize a bunch of them that have "weakened".
Really blows my mind that so much ink is spilled over "literally" while "really" gets a pass for doing the same thing really.
You "hold the fort". It's a military position.
Only a fort molester would "hold down" the fort.
"Literally" meaning figuratively. I'm fine with most words changing with use; but we need that word! It's how you indicate you're not exaggerating or speaking dramatically! Especially these days, that clarification is important!
I'm also seeing a lot of corporate buzzwords in job descriptions. I get that these are essentially technical terms, but they're not being used for accuracy or clarity here. You just don't like how short your description is.
Eh, to make a long story short, corpos have been using jargon and buzzwords in job descriptions, literally forever. 🤪
"I have nothing to hide" -Man wearing pants
"It's just common sense." No, it's usually either an inference you made based on incorrect information, or it's information you gleaned from your particular environment that not everyone has experienced.
Terry Pratchett used to describe that as the school of "what my mate down the pub said" thinking.
"It is what it is". This cliche is symptomatic of learned helplessness and only serves to protect the status quo against any sort critical analysis and reform.
Pretty context dependant. Some things you can't change and have to deal with, so it is what it is. We got shit tools but the work needs to be done now so it is what it is.
It's sad you feel that way. We can't magically change the weather today, it is what it is. But if we keep pressuring businesses and politicians, we may be able to mitigate it for future generations.
I get unreasonably enraged at "am I the only one who". It's so arrogant and dismisses all the people who have been expressing the same opinion. Yes, you're so special and unique, you must be the first person to bring it up.
I've also had it with "literally". There is no need to use that word unless you are saying something that might be interpreted as figurative and you are clarifying that you mean it literally. "We literally live on the same street". Is there a figurative meaning to that? Why do you need to specify you mean it literally?
Any turn of phrase which is stated incorrectly. Eg.
- case and point
- doggie dog world
- at your beckon call
- they're on tender hooks
- should tie you over
- it's a mute point
I know what all of these are supposed to be except the tender hooks one. I've said it aloud and it's driving me crazy because I can NOT figure it out.
Is it a regional one maybe? I'm from the US so maybe it's one from elsewhere in the world? I bet I'm going to feel like a real dumb dumb when I figure out the answer and it's hella obvious lmao.
Edit: Googled it and figured out that it's actually "tenterhooks" and just basically means that someone is uneasy. I've never heard that phrase in my life. Kinda dope that I learned a new phrase today!
Yes, tenterhooks are used to stretch and stress fabric.
I imagine tenderhooks, if they existed, would probably be to tenderize meat or something. If they existed.
“They didn’t do their diligence on that one”
“The gig is up”
Both from a podcast I listened to. I’m still not sure if they ever learned.
Oh god; where to start?
- 'literally'. It's best when using the Essex pronunciation of 'litchally' for maximum cringey delivery.
- 'the ask'. Because 'request' or 'question' is too hard to say around the pablum.
- 'the spend'. Off the car lot, it sounds super-douchey.
- 'action this'. Why decide on a verb like 'do' or 'complete' or 'revisit' or 'prioritize'?
- 'begs the question'. Chances are, it really doesn't. And using that wrongly makes you sound like Mike Tyson saying 'utilize'
And now there's one more:
- 'utilize'; or, really, anyone using stilted 'formal' phrasing instead of plain English. You don't sound posh, but you do sound like you're three kids in a trenchcoat trying to fake being an adult so you don't get booted from the R-rated movie.
I dont let my emotions control me like that, but I know what you mean. :)
I've seen/heard a few Americans (old and young) saying something like "it has been a minute" to indicate "it has been a long time". What the hell is that? How did that start? Please someone enlighten me
It's just a euphemism, it's a sentence made funny by how much it understates the reality of the situation
That one's been around long enough I doubt anyone really knows its origin. It does follow a pattern of using the minute to describe various amounts of time.
For instance, a 'New York minute' means extremely quickly and a 'hot minute' is a long time, but much less than just 'it's been a minute'.
"Let that sink in..."
All I think about is what does the sink want, and why is it outside? Any point they were trying to make is now a joke to me. Better to say "think about that for a minute."
"to make a long story short" - especially when used multiple times in one story and/or as a mindless audiospace filler to hold control of the conversation while assembling more thoughts/words... without knowing both the long and short version it literally adds nothing to the communication, it literally makes the story longer every time you use it (wasting my time), it's probably the longest socially acceptable way to say that (one could just say: "in short"), and it's got just enough word-scramble verbal complexity to occupy the higher order English parsing logic.
Perfect chance to interrupt their story:
“Please make your long story short.”
"Let's agree to disagree"
This solves nothing, it just equates to a polite way of saying I'm done talking to you.
What do you do if you realise you're just arguing in circles and nothing will be solved by continuing discussing that topic?
It admits that neither party is willing to change their opinion so an agreement can't be reached, let's move on.
But there are some of us who don't even care if Star Trek is better than Star Wars.
"no offense" then proceeds to offend said person, or people using the word "YALL" how did it become popular when 15-20years ago and was considered unintelligent. Also people saying "entitled to thier own opinions" but end up saying thier own opinions matter more.