this post was submitted on 06 Oct 2025
616 points (99.8% liked)

Open Source

41208 readers
1144 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The project, developed in partnership with veteran free software developer Rob Savoye, aims to create a fully free and open mobile platform, from the firmware to the operating system.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] koncertejo@lemmy.ml 2 points 23 minutes ago

I've got a Google Pixel 3a with postmarketOS installed on it right now for testing, and it really is a two-pronged issue with both hardware and software. Because it's an older phone the battery drains within a few hours, nowhere close to all-day use. Because most of the software is designed for the desktop certain things are just impossible to use (the big pain point for me is Anki, but on the other hand it's impressive how many GTK apps conform very nicely to the screen). The keyboard still feels pretty rough.

Hopefully the FSF dipping their hat into the ring will help existing projects like this in a rising-tide-raises-all-ships sort of way. Would be a shame for them to put effort into a software stack that goes nowhere (GNU Hurd), and pour $$$ into a hardware project that doesn't make it to market or doesn't do its job better than a cracked smartphone from 5+ years ago.

I think it is possible to switch to it now and have things mostly work out for you, but it will make your life harder. I remember switching to Ubuntu around 2010 and it's almost to that level of experience. You'll be giving up a lot, apps you "need" won't work, but it's at the point where it is a complete usable experience. For those that are willing to suffer for FOSS, I mean.

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 1 points 31 minutes ago
[–] foremanguy92_@lemmy.ml 1 points 42 minutes ago

What a nice thing to do

[–] pastermil@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 hours ago

Hopefully this will recruit projects that already have significant headstart, such as Pine64. Otherwise, it would merely be performative.

[–] Patariki@feddit.nl 66 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

I salute the early adopters who will suffer all the inconveniences of startups so the wider public can enjoy a non-corporate phone in the future. o7

[–] schema@lemmy.world 12 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I'm looking forward to get one of these just to play around with it, and maybe making some custom stuff for it.

[–] krooklochurm@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 hours ago

I'm looking forward to actually seeing how my fucking works and what it's doing.

[–] ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online 3 points 5 hours ago

As soon as my current phone is paid off I am going to get this. No more fucking Spyware up the ass.

[–] muhyb@programming.dev 48 points 8 hours ago

I hope they can pull this off because we really need this.

[–] AnimalsDream@slrpnk.net 29 points 10 hours ago

Oooh, I wonder if they're going to pursue a free phone based on Risc-V. It's a longshot but if they pull that off, it'd be like feeding two birds with one scone.

[–] Ultraword@lemmy.ml 20 points 10 hours ago

I really hope this is super based

[–] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 17 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

Just because it's a libre phone, doesn't mean it's necessarily a linux phone. Or at least any more so than Android is a linux phone because it uses a heavily modified (almost unrecognizable) linux kernel.

There's nothing in the article that says they're just going to use a mainline linux kernel and throw a touch optimized version of some existing desktop on it (ubuntu touch, etc...)

Heck, they could be meaning that they're planning on making their own heavily modified kernel for their very own OS so as to skip all of the trouble that trying to make mainline linux into a handheld device has been so far. (similar to I believe how SailfishOS is doing it)

[–] Pika@rekabu.ru 1 points 3 hours ago

Does anyone claim so? And does it matter much outside of (potentially) app support?

[–] lemmyknow@lemmy.today 5 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

Why couldn't they just use usual Linux for that? Why a modified kernel? Is Linux as is not suitable for a phone?

Can't they just, idk, make a distro? Maybe from scratch? Pop!_OS is working on COSMIC. Can't they have their Linux-based OS, perhaps with its own things as needed, such as a phone-optimised DE? Or whatever the phone equivalent of a DESKTOP environment would be. A Mobile Environment, perhaps

If my laptop had touch screen with no other method of input built in, and were way smaller, could it not run Linux? Or is that different altogether?

[–] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

Linux by design gives the user enough rope to hang themselves with.

And that's certainly not a problem when dealing with tech enthusiasts who know what, when and where to touch to avoid messing things up. But when you're dealing with getting a phone into the hands of ordinary people, that isn't going to fly because all of those people will at some point start mucking around inside and then expect tech support when they mess up.

For mainstream adoption, the linux kernel must and the desktop environment must be at least somewhat locked down.

[–] FreeBooteR69@lemmy.ca 1 points 20 minutes ago

We have immutable distributions already, that is something that isn't a problem. It's replacing those pesky proprietary blobs used to talk to the hardware that is a headache.

[–] UpperBroccoli@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 34 minutes ago

Between capabilities, namespaces, control groups, mandatory access control (AppArmor etc) and other mechanisms, I think there are plenty of ways to reduce user access to any part of the system.

[–] primal_buddhist@lemmy.world 5 points 3 hours ago

Too many bits of a smartphone are proprietary hardware without open drivers.

[–] Lettuceeatlettuce@lemmy.ml 34 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

Linux mobile phones are the fusion power of the FOSS world, always right around the corner.

All the pieces are there, but none of them work together smoothly enough to be functional for anybody except the most hardcore FOSS enthusiasts.

When Proton started, it was kind of a joke, killed the Steam Machine idea in large part because the game compatibility was so limited. A decade later, we have a multi billion dollar handheld PC market lead by the Steam Deck, a Linux handheld that can play tens of thousands of Windows games without issue, in some cases with better performance than their native platform.

So it's certainly possible for things to completely change, but we need a big player or consortium of players to unite with a shared goal of getting a Linux Phone to the state where it's genuinely able to replace a traditional Android or Apple phone.

I'm very cautiously optimistic, I think it would come together much faster than Proton did for Linux gaming, but again, there needs to be a really heavy push into a singular device to start off. Like how the Steam Deck was, it allowed devs to have a singular platform to target for compatibility. Then, as the platform matures, competitors & innovators can enter the market and expand options, like how now there are multiple distros with builds for handhelds, like Bazzite, Nobara, and CachyOS.

[–] Canuck@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 hour ago

I would love if Valve shipped and contributed to Plasma Mobile and Plasma Bigscreen alongside the existing Plasma Desktop. Or even if more Steam Deck users installed it so that it would get more interest.

[–] orgrinrt@lemmy.world 9 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

At this point I would not be surprised if steam built on top of the deck idea and the support it already provides for fairly responsive and configurable inputs, touch screen included, to launch a steam phone or something.

I mean deck isn’t all that far from having such a device. For the actual phone network stack they would likely just partner up with someone already in the space.

They’ve already had to tackle powering a lightweight portable device with a touch screen and adapting the UX for a small screen and non-kbd input. They’ve already established they can source parts and mass produce a competively priced device.

But realistically I can’t see it being that much better than the recent Linux phone offerings.

[–] msage@programming.dev 5 points 4 hours ago

None of what you described is an issue with Linux phones.

We need open firmware for broadbands.

[–] pigup@lemmy.world 72 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

I want a Linux phone so bad that I refuse to think about what it would be like because i'd be upset afterwards.

[–] fleg@szmer.info 10 points 7 hours ago

I have an original PinePhone. The phone itself is horribly outdated and slow, but the software itself (Phosh+Gnome) is suprisingly okay. Given a good enough phone (as in hardware) I can see myself actually using it and not being annoyed more than I was with early Androids.

Unfortunately what I understand is that FSFE doesn't intend to do hardware, only software platform, so I wonder whether they'll come up with anything interesting.

[–] this@sh.itjust.works 17 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

My hopes and my expectations could not be more at odds with each other, and the only thing I know for sure is that one of them will be smashed.

[–] pastermil@sh.itjust.works 7 points 11 hours ago

As they would say: keep your hopes up and your expectation low to the ground

[–] selokichtli@lemmy.ml 124 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (2 children)

I won't hold my breath, but it's sorely needed, so, we can hope.

[–] Maybelline@lemmy.zip 77 points 16 hours ago (5 children)

That's funny. I can't hold my width.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] vga@sopuli.xyz 5 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (2 children)

Why would anyone think that FSF is capable of releasing a unique and good device? It's gonna be a bog-standard Android device with some software modified/removed.

Might be ok for some people still though. Also I'll be happy to be wrong about my cynicism.

[–] balsoft@lemmy.ml 8 points 5 hours ago

It’s gonna be a bog-standard Android device with some software modified/removed.

Really? That would be heavily antithetical to everything they do. I expect it would be a Linux distro (like PostmarketOS) with some blobs removed etc.

[–] vivendi@programming.dev 1 points 4 hours ago

Because as much as they're ridiculed today by libcucks of OSS, FSF was a formidable force of software once. At some point in history literally the only way to avoid paying absolutely insane manufacturer license fees for things like compilers was using GNU tools.

If they put their ass into it, they can pull it off tbh

[–] hereforawhile@lemmy.ml 33 points 16 hours ago
[–] lennee@lemmy.world 52 points 18 hours ago

gimme gimme

[–] unexpected@forum.guncadindex.com 45 points 17 hours ago (4 children)

I'm celebrating!

As a linux phone guy this is good news. Any more pushing towards a more solid linux phone environment is a big plus.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 12 points 14 hours ago

I can't find any links to the project itself, only to announcements about the project. Anybody have anything more concrete? How far along is this project?

[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 13 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

Please god, help me find my keys! Tell St. Anthony I need my keys!

Also could you make this Foss phone be real and reasonably priced below the cost of a gaming PC?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Mynameisallen@lemmy.zip 32 points 17 hours ago

Honestly as long as they can fucking get something moderately priced that supports VOLTE and a decent camera I’ll buy it

[–] danielquinn@lemmy.ca 23 points 16 hours ago (8 children)

I'd rather see a stable OS and ecosystem for good, Free apps that we can flash onto existing devices. I'm quite happy with my Fairphone (repairable! modular! ethical!) and we know that building and marketing a device is painfully expensive.

Let's make Debian or Arch just work on most phones instead of trying to compete in a saturated market.

[–] ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net 1 points 7 minutes ago

Mobian is Debian designed for phones. PostmarketOS is another project doing the same thing, but with an alpine Linux base.

[–] Ferk@lemmy.ml 4 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

There isn't much concrete information, but my guess is that OS/ecosystem is exactly what this project is, and that they are not talking about physical hardware. Specially considering that they are putting the emphasis on free software (not hardware) and they are involving a software developer. Making a phone's hardware free would be an entirely different beast.

In the afternoon, FSF executive director Zoë Kooyman announced an exciting new project: Librephone.

Librephone is a new initiative by the FSF to bring full computing freedom to mobile computing environments. The LibrePhone Project is a partnership with Rob Savoye, a developer who has worked on free software (including the GNU toolchain) since the 1980s. "Since mobile phone computing is now so ubiquitous, we're very excited about LibrePhone and think it has the potential to bring software freedom to many more users all over the world."

From the official FSF post about the event.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›