this post was submitted on 14 Oct 2025
673 points (98.3% liked)

politics

26068 readers
2984 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Obama's comments appear in a new video supporting Gavin Newsom's Proposition 50 which would allow the California legislature to draw new congressional boundaries ahead of the midterms

Barack Obama has entered the political fray ahead of November's special election in California, accusing Republicans of attempting to "rig the next election" in a new ad backing Governor Gavin Newsom's Proposition 50, a ballot measure that could reshape the state's congressional map.

"Republicans want to steal enough seats in Congress to rig the next election and wield unchecked power for two more years," Obama says in the 30-second ad, urging voters to approve the proposal. "You can stop Republicans in their tracks."

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Quit trying to make Newsome happen

It's really fucking tone deaf to push a Zionist in the face of cratering support for Israel among Democratic voters.

But then the Democratic party has a history of being tone deaf, like Biden picking Kamala "top cop" Harris for vp during the height of the George Floyd protests.

Biden won, but these stunts often fail.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 day ago
[–] Jumbie@lemmy.zip 126 points 2 days ago (31 children)
[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 99 points 2 days ago (2 children)

They also rigged the last election, and every election for several decades.

If all of the Geriatric Old Pedophiles various attempts at election fraud were prosecuted the US wouldn't be a failing fascist state today.

"Purging" voters, "gerrymandering", etc are morally and ethically no different than election fraud; you've already chosen treason against democracy.

[–] Jumbie@lemmy.zip 47 points 2 days ago (2 children)

This entire attack on blue cities is so obviously an extension of the ballot box violence scare tactics used by the red hats during the last election.

I don’t see anyone pointing it out in the media.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Maeve@midwest.social 5 points 1 day ago

He is only telling a part of the truth, the palatable part, while disingenuously omitting the rest.

load more comments (29 replies)
[–] individual@toast.ooo 66 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (17 children)

for the love of God, don't stick us with newsome

[–] AcidiclyBasicGlitch@sh.itjust.works 24 points 2 days ago (1 children)

AOC is my top choice, but I know everybody has a million reasons why America wouldn't elect her as president.

But, I had this thought the other day, and I know this is nobody's dream team, but possibly the odd couple situation that just might work. Am I crazy for thinking a Pritzker-AOC ticket might actually have a decent chance?

[–] ToastedRavioli@midwest.social 20 points 2 days ago (2 children)

The Pritzkers are literally the billionaire family of the Hyatt hotel chain fortune. They are, if anything, one part of the problem with the democratic establishment. If you want there to be zero change in society when it comes to taxing the wealthy to create social safety nets, JB is your guy.

Realistically there is zero chance that an actual progressive and a Pritzker could ever function on one ticket. Thats like Bernie running with Bezos, it makes no sense

[–] WindyRebel@lemmy.world 19 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Pritzker is a guy who comes from money but actually does try and govern for the people. I live in Illinois and he did a bang up job for COVID, is actively doing things to try and fight/resist ICE and shows up in person to talk to the people, has signed vaccination protections to law, he helped to get stalled projects (like road repairs) going, he’s helped with education funding and requiring homeschooling to have more standards, and more.

Yeah, he’s not perfect but he’s at least one who fucking fights for the people and is trying to find ways to make things better for us in Illinois. I truly believe he would do the same on a national level.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 6 points 1 day ago

Nobody hates Sociopathic Oligarchs more than I do, but there have been cases of ultra-wealthy people being sympathetic to the people.

The best example is Franklin Roosevelt. By my general way of thinking, I never would have supported him based on his wealth alone. And yet he went in to do more for working people than any 10 presidents combined.

So while my general attitude is to NEVER support a billionaire for office, I am prepared to make exceptions for the right candidate, but they have a very high bar to clear to get my support.

Pritzker is looking like a possibility, but I'm still deciding. I'd love AOC, but she's problematic at this stage. I can't stand establishment Dems like Newsome. But I will vote for anyone who vows to purge MAGA from our government and our society, reconfigure our government to remove MAGA advantages, and then follows through.

We have to deal decisively with MAGA before we can do any thing else. We can deal with progressive policies after that.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world -3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Ad supporting Gavin Newsom

Supporting him to do what? He's not running for reelection for governor. Dude hasn't declared for Senator or President. What are you supporting, you hack?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›