154
submitted 11 months ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/politics@lemmy.world
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world 57 points 11 months ago

Voting matters people. The big name races for president, senate, etc don't have nearly as much impact on your day to day life as local races and your vote has significantly more impact the smaller the race.

All those shit hole red states that are passing crazy legislation? That's because conservatives spent the last few decades focused on state congresses and it worked extremely well. It's going to take at least that level of commitment. Put up good progressive candidates every primary (and fucking vote for them) and vote Democrat in the general election. That's the only path that leads to change. You cannot get away from the 2 party system without eliminating FTTP voting and the only party that will allow that is the Democratic party. Voting 3rd party or abstaining from voting because Democrats "need to earn your vote" does nothing but make it worse.

[-] osarusan@kbin.social 23 points 11 months ago

"yeah but biden doesn't make me feel tingly in my pants so im just gonna vote for jill stein and may she'll win this time and then fix all of my problems"

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 29 points 11 months ago

This reminds me of the fact that a significant number of January 6th insurrectionists didn't vote at all.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-election-2020/capitol-riot-election-vote-trump-b1795865.html

[-] silence7@slrpnk.net 15 points 11 months ago

To be fair, they believe in dictatorship, rather than power-determined-by-getting-votes.

[-] Neato@kbin.social 13 points 11 months ago

Mr. Roth, a landfill manager and father of four, ran a campaign. He canvassed voters, handed out yard signs and marched in the town’s parade in August. Mr. Green, an auto body technician whose household includes six children, chose not to campaign, trusting that voters would remember his stances from a previous run.

Good. If you care so little you aren't going to even vote for yourself, you don't deserve to hold elected officer.

Dude just tried to coast into office. Sad. Also it said there was a primary, but ballotpedia said it was a nonpartisan election?

[-] silence7@slrpnk.net 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Primaries aren't always partisan. I think WA uses a top-two system for primaries.

[-] ArugulaZ@kbin.social 9 points 11 months ago

"I demand a recount!"
"Okay. One for Martin, two for Martin."

[-] Vaggumon@lemm.ee 8 points 11 months ago

Too bad this doesn't work for pres votes.

[-] silence7@slrpnk.net 8 points 11 months ago

Quite a few states came out only a few tens of thousands of votes apart last time. It's worth reading up on candidates all the way down the ballot before voting.

[-] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 11 months ago

It’s almost impossible for many small towns to have sufficient coverage on candidates running for small offices. We’re often completely in the dark about who’s running, unless they’ve been In office already and town meetings that give us a hint about their views. Most just put wishy-washy bullshit on a Facebook page with nothing else on it when they run.

I have avoided a few bad votes by finding twitter accounts of these assholes, but it’s rare in the last couple local elections.

[-] silence7@slrpnk.net 2 points 11 months ago

At least where I am, the League of Women Voters holds candidate forums for city council and school board. A no-show at these means people won't vote for you, so any credible candidate ends up on the record on at least a few key issues.

[-] Ranvier@sopuli.xyz 0 points 11 months ago

2000 election that gave us George W Bush came down to only 537 votes in one state. Assuming you believe the totals which.... Yeah. Thanks Florida. Anyways point is it was very very close.

[-] autotldr 1 points 11 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


The two were competing for a seat on the City Council in Rainier, a community of approximately 2,400 people about 16 miles southeast of the state capital, Olympia.

Mr. Green, an auto body technician whose household includes six children, chose not to campaign, trusting that voters would remember his stances from a previous run.

After clearing a primary election, the two candidates met at a public forum with sitting City Council members.

“I ran for other people, not for me,” he said, adding that at the public forum before the Nov. 7 vote, he learned that he and Mr. Roth held similar views.

The race for Rainier City Council was part of Thurston County elections, which included a countywide proposition to raise sales taxes to give law enforcement funding a boost.

In the last instance of a tie, Thurston County favored a coin toss — which Mr. Green said could have ended his bid for the council seat with the same outcome.


The original article contains 434 words, the summary contains 162 words. Saved 63%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

this post was submitted on 07 Dec 2023
154 points (97.5% liked)

politics

19107 readers
3053 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS