342

The Guns Were Said to Be Destroyed. Instead, They Were Reborn. (www.nytimes.com)

submitted 11 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

82 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Communities across the U.S. are fueling a secondary arms market by giving seized and surrendered guns to disposal services that destroy one part and resell the rest.

When Flint, Mich., announced in September that 68 assault weapons collected in a gun buyback would be incinerated, the city cited its policy of never reselling firearms.

“Gun violence continues to cause enormous grief and trauma,” said Mayor Sheldon Neeley. “I will not allow our city government to profit from our community’s pain by reselling weapons that can be turned against Flint residents.”

But Flint’s guns were not going to be melted down. Instead, they made their way to a private company that has collected millions of dollars taking firearms from police agencies, destroying a single piece of each weapon stamped with the serial number and selling the rest as nearly complete gun kits. Buyers online can easily replace what’s missing and reconstitute the weapon.

Hundreds of towns and cities have turned to a growing industry that offers to destroy guns used in crimes, surrendered in buybacks or replaced by police force upgrades. But these communities are in fact fueling a secondary arms market, where weapons slated for destruction are recycled into civilian hands, often with no background check required, according to interviews and a review of gun disposal contracts, patent records and online listings for firearms parts.

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 38 points 11 months ago

Buyers online can easily replace what’s missing and reconstitute the weapon.

I like how this article doesn't mention that since it is the serialized receiver they need to "fix" the buyer still has to pass a NICs background check at an FFL to get the receiver separately, instead implying they can just buy it online like ordering car parts. Nice subtle move to make it sound worse than it actually is, gotta push those feature bans!

[-] babboa@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago

Yep. Most people clutching their pearls at this story don't have any idea how difficult it is to actually build anything outside a gen 3 Glock or an ar-15. And those have "80% kits" that basically say "drill hole here" available on the market. Try finding a hi point, lorcin, or even Taurus or low end S&W pistol, or cheap shotgun(like a Stevens or Remington 870) receiver(because that's most of what comes into these guys who have businesses like this), and you'll find out it is a) cost prohibitive, b) still has to go through a nics check bc there's nobody home building much of anything (well, the hi point may be the odd one out bc there are 3d printed frames you could make). What they do end up doing is a lot of business with guys refurbishing grandpa's old deer or duck gun.

[-] mctoasterson@reddthat.com 7 points 11 months ago

And thankfully these kits are out there. Say you have inherited grandpa's old rifle and it has a clean receiver but is otherwise pretty thrashed... You can spend a few hundred bucks and get parts to repair old guns that would otherwise have no parts availability.

load more comments (1 replies)

[-] NoMoreLurking@startrek.website 6 points 11 months ago

I guess that companies like this one

https://youtu.be/5q54yLuJlKk?feature=shared

adhere to regulations, but it is not unimaginable that there are those who could make the same part and sell it under the table. It's not even a necessity to own a CNC to cut this part out of a block of aluminium, an old-time milling machine and 20 hours worth of training are enough to get the job done.

[-] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 11 months ago

Well yes crimes can always be committed but making and selling without a manufacturers license is a serious crime punishable by iirc 10yr in prison or more. Making your own is legal but virtually impossible to stop even if they have to make a luty SMG and ECM rifle the barrel at home.

[-] ExLisper@linux.community 35 points 11 months ago

I would like to have the imagination that would let me come up with schemes like that. It would never occur to me to make money off of gun violence. American capitalist are something else...

load more comments (3 replies)

[-] Jaysyn@kbin.social 35 points 11 months ago

Sounds like fraud, but I'm sure they have some bullshit legaleze protecting their ass.

[-] radix@lemmy.world 52 points 11 months ago

A "gun" is legally defined. There are dozens of parts, but usually only 1-2 are deemed to be the "firearm" for legal purposes, and those get the serial number. The rest, even when necessary for proper operation of the weapon, are essentially just accessories as far as the law is concerned.

[-] Machinist3359@kbin.social 11 points 11 months ago

Sounds like a useful loophole for gun reform and getting around the 2nd amendment.

[-] Bgugi@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago

It's a practical line that has to be drawn. Otherwise your going to have to go for a background check for every pin screw and spring you want to buy.

[-] QuinceDaPence@kbin.social 6 points 11 months ago

Some countries use the barrel as the S/N part instead of the receiver but I'd rather a wear item not be the s/n item. Plus, with AR15 you can buy one receiver and then gets finished uppers in 5.56mm, 9mm, .50 Beowulf, .300 Blackout etc.

load more comments (1 replies)

[-] BigDiction@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

That’s kind of what California has in place for semi auto rifles. If the gun has certain ‘assault features’ like a collapsible stock, pistol grip, muzzle device, etc - the firearm needs to be taken apart to remove the magazine.

If the firearm has no assault features, then you can have a standard removable magazine (capped at 10 rounds). As a result you’ll see some pretty odd looking CA compliant rifles sold in state that are featureless.

load more comments (1 replies)

load more comments (8 replies)

[-] kerrigan778@lemmy.world 34 points 11 months ago

Most of a gun isn't the part that is legally considered a gun. The lower receiver, which is the part that makes it shoot and has the serial number on it is legally the gun. The rest are just gun accessories essentially and anybody can buy and sell them. You can't just turn any amount of them into one functional gun, you need the lower receiver. You cannot buy a lower receiver without going through a background check and the fact that you can buy everything but the lower receiver without a background check doesn't change the fact that you don't have a gun without getting a hold of the lower receiver which does require a background check to get.

This article is rage bait for people who don't know about guns.

[-] vivadanang@lemm.ee 18 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

You cannot buy a lower receiver without going through a background check

yeah but you can easily buy an 80% arms lower, finish that yourself, and no bg check involved.

Or you could just get a lower from private sales which aren't required to bg check.

Saying it's impossimole wivvout de lowah is just bullshit and you know it. But cute attempt to be cranky. Like you're attempting to rage bait for people who don't know enough about the arms trade.

[-] kerrigan778@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Yes, there is no (federal) law against making a gun yourself or from a kit that has basically always been a thing. You can also 3d print most of all of a gun. And this also does nothing to change the lack of UBC law. Those are unrelated issues. (And for the record, I support most UBC laws).

The ability to buy or build a gun without a background check via private party is unchanged by the ability to cheaply buy gun accessories from destroyed guns.

[-] vivadanang@lemm.ee 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

The ability to buy or build a gun without a background check via private party is unchanged by the ability to cheaply buy gun accessories from destroyed guns.

yeah pretty fucked up that we'll let people buy most of a gun without a check, then the rest without another check. good to find ground we can agree on.

440 million firearms in the USA. Never seems like enough to some folks. And you know what, I'd be chill with it, if they could fucking secure their weapons.

But they won't. Sometime this week, someone, somewhere is gonna get murdered with a firearm some dickhole couldn't bother to secure, who left it in their car, who didn't even know it was already stolen because they're too fucking dumb to do the minimum.

[-] kerrigan778@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago

No disagreement there, my guns are locked the fuck up and UBCs and gun storage laws are no brainers.

[-] vivadanang@lemm.ee 5 points 11 months ago

TY. I wish more gun loving people had the same attitude.

[-] FartsWithAnAccent@lemmy.world 33 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Gun buyback programs are almost always a joke of one kind or another.

[-] douz0a0bouz@midwest.social 27 points 11 months ago

It’s wild how you get: gun buyback programs = bad. Rather than: corrupt corporations need watchdogs.

[-] shalafi@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Gun buy backs are a total joke. All you end up buying is a bunch of busted ass guns that nobody wanted. Wish they would have one around here. I could unload a few that I hate, are useless or nonfunctional. Get paid son!

Saw a hilarious picture of an Australian buy back. Those ancient rifles, shotguns and rusted out revolvers were laughable. If you used a photo tool to gather the most common color from that pile, it would be the dark orange guns turn when they rust. Bet not 1 in 10 was functional.

And the idiots in the article were patting themselves on the back for doing such a fine job taking these guns out of circulation! They were so very proud.

[-] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 11 months ago

How many mass shootings has Australia had in the past decade, again?

[-] Milk_Sheikh@lemm.ee 7 points 11 months ago

Mandatory confiscation and eliminating new sales =! US gun buybacks where the stores are still open

load more comments (4 replies)

[-] tinkeringidiot@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

Why would you “sell back” actual guns when you can build a functioning 12 gauge shotgun from $20 of parts from the hardware store? Slap a few of those together and turn them in for a solid contribution toward your next gun.

[-] FartsWithAnAccent@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

You think intentionally fraudulent programs with no meaningful oversight or meaningful accountability are OK? That's what seems wild to me but ok.

There's no way this is the first time this has happened either.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 19 points 11 months ago

Maybe, then, you should be calling for more oversight and accountability of such programs rather than dismissing them as a joke.

[-] FartsWithAnAccent@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

You're making a shitload of wild assumptions about me (also, they are wrong), but ok: Good chat.

By the way, if you look further up the thread, you'll see that I called for just that.

load more comments (2 replies)

[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 15 points 11 months ago

Only in the US, again. Other places just crush that stuff and melt it.

[-] FartsWithAnAccent@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

Pretty much, yeah.

load more comments (1 replies)

[-] originalfrozenbanana@lemm.ee 10 points 11 months ago

Why is that?

[-] FartsWithAnAccent@lemmy.world 18 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

There's no real oversight, no accountability, little to no regulation, and the prices they offer are almost always well below the fair market value of the firearm (never mind the black market value) so most people end up keeping, selling, or pawning the gun instead. Functional firearms are kept in circulation as a result (the opposite of the supposedly intended goal).

There are also cases of people just making $20 pipe guns to rip off even the well intentioned programs, some programs try to mitigate this, some don't, but there are no set rules beyond whatever the program decides.

I guarantee you, the program mentioned in the article is not the first to pull that reselling shit too.

These programs need to be regulated and there needs to be meaningful oversight or they will always be a joke. As it stands they are, at best, public relations campaigns and, at worst, fraudulent and potentially very dangerous.

[-] originalfrozenbanana@lemm.ee 3 points 11 months ago

That’s unfortunate. I wish we had competent government.

[-] FartsWithAnAccent@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

Groups like the NRA put a lot of money into lobbying politicians to protect the gun industry. They don't even really care about the 2nd amendment, they care about protecting the bottom line of companies like Colt and S&W.

load more comments (1 replies)

load more comments (6 replies)

[-] VintageTech@sh.itjust.works 30 points 11 months ago

I attended an auction in UT where I came across guns like this and the part that was destroyed on most of them was the serial number. Yay 'Merica and upcycling?

[-] FluorideMind@lemmy.world 15 points 11 months ago

Seems sensationalized, they destroy the part considered the firearm (lower receiver) and sell the rest for parts. I don't see any issues with that.

[-] TheJims@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago

Those guns have more constitutional rights than the school children that are indiscriminately murdered with them.

load more comments (15 replies)

load more comments

this post was submitted on 10 Dec 2023

342 points (94.3% liked)

News

23376 readers

1858 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.

2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.

3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.

4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.

5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.

6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.

7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.

8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.

9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.

10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

rjc@lemmy.world

Thekingoflorda@lemmy.world

Tenthrow@lemmy.world

JonsJava@lemmy.world

gedaliyah@lemmy.world

little_cow@lemmy.world

jeffw@lemmy.world

enu@lemmy.world