223
submitted 11 months ago by TokenBoomer@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Beautyoftheplanet.com

all 39 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] MrPoopyButthole@lemm.ee 70 points 11 months ago

Imagine how racist that shark must be

[-] N0body@sh.itjust.works 17 points 11 months ago

"Oppressors are way too soft these days. Colonizers from back in my day knew how to handle indigenous populations - biological warfare and slavery."

[-] chitak166@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago

Biological warfare is a freebie because Natives typically didn't have resistance built up that Europeans got from the black plague.

It's my understanding the black plague was simply brought about by filthy living conditions in cities.

[-] jasondj@ttrpg.network 2 points 11 months ago

Animal agriculture continues to this day to be one of the largest breeders of disease (see practically any E. Coli or salmonella recall in leafey greens — almost always due to animal runoff).

The old world lucked out in having a good number of dumb docile animals to domesticate, so it went hardcore on animal agriculture. As such they got exposed to a lot of disease.

The new world, not so much. We got some big game, but most of it was not something easy to domesticate. Either too aggressive, too hard to contain, or both. So they didn’t get the animal agriculture or the generations of fighting various disease that go along with it.

[-] chitak166@lemmy.world -2 points 11 months ago

Do you think farming animals was a significant contributor to the black plague?

It's my understanding it was spread primarily by rats, who thrived in the filthy conditions within cities and shipping vessels.

[-] jasondj@ttrpg.network 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Specifically the black plague, no. But you also don’t get cities to the scale of European ones without agriculture. Especially back then. Globalism and processed foods have made a vegetarian/vegan diet sustainable year round for practically anyone. That was also very difficult in a lot of places for a lot of history.

[-] FeetinMashedPotatoes@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

"too many damn land animals in our waters these days. Back in my day you wouldn't see a land animal down here unless them Krakens started kraken their ship down here, damn Landers"

[-] BertramDitore@lemmy.world 59 points 11 months ago

This is really cool, but I’m not so sure about the source.

Choice quote: “Previously, scientists used the size of the animal to determine their length.”

[-] jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de 53 points 11 months ago
[-] QuarterSwede@lemmy.world 15 points 11 months ago

Between 272 and 512 years old. Still freaking old.

[-] jettrscga@lemmy.world 14 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Surely the age of the animal was similarly determined from the age.

[-] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 10 points 11 months ago

You can tell that it's a Greenland shark because of the way it is.

[-] Jerb322@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago

I read that part three times to make sure it wasn't me miss reading.

[-] OrteilGenou@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Oi'll tell ye, when me miss is readin' oi steer well clear of 'er.

[-] theKalash@feddit.ch 8 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

From context it's quite clear that "length" was supposed to say "age". Seems more like an accidental mix up of words rather than bad source material.

[-] BertramDitore@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Yeah, I know what they were trying to say. The whole thing reads like a middle school research essay though, it's completely full of errors and very strange word choice. That wasn't even the only error in that one sentence I quoted. Regardless, it's a very cool topic, just the source (the website, not the research) is a bit questionable.

Granted, I'm usually too critical this early in the morning.

[-] theKalash@feddit.ch 6 points 11 months ago

Never mind, they have right-click protection on their site. Very questionable indeed.

[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

Well, to be clear, analyzing an animals size is one way to determine its length.

[-] liztliss@lemmy.world 19 points 11 months ago

That shark has seen some shit

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago

Mostly fish shit.

[-] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

Theres no way that thing still "sees" anything

[-] liztliss@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

That shark has experienced some shit!

[-] Serdan@lemm.ee 3 points 11 months ago

Iirc half of them are blind due to parasites in the eyes.

[-] groupofcrows@lemmy.ca 19 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Lets make it a candidate for US president or a senator. Does it still qualify to become a LA Laker?

[-] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

Can't be President. Senator is still on the table though.

[-] Amazinghorse@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

If you were born in America before America was America, are you still American?

[-] Tugboater203@lemmy.world 15 points 11 months ago

They don't really mention how they get samples of eye lenses to perform the dating.

[-] ililiililiililiilili@lemm.ee 21 points 11 months ago

Retrieving samples would be the last thing on my mind if I was dating a shark. I'd be preoccupied choosing an appropriate appetizer and getting that silver fox back to my underwater cave.

[-] ReiRose@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago

Grandpa shark do do do do do do

[-] OrteilGenou@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

Look how soft and cuddly those eyes are

[-] a_mac_and_con@kbin.social 3 points 11 months ago

Is the preview picture… not showing a shark to anyone else? I clicked on the article and didn’t see this picture there either.

[-] Xariphon@kbin.social 4 points 11 months ago

Looks like Luchador Bowser to me.

[-] a_mac_and_con@kbin.social 2 points 11 months ago

Related articles: Bowser is 513 years old, beating out an old shark

[-] squiblet@kbin.social 1 points 11 months ago

kbin does that now and then.

[-] snooggums@kbin.social 1 points 11 months ago

I just assumed the shark is a luchador.

[-] a_mac_and_con@kbin.social 1 points 11 months ago

Wow, I didn’t know luchadors could make it past 500.

this post was submitted on 13 Dec 2023
223 points (89.7% liked)

News

23296 readers
3471 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS