It's not entirely wrong. Way back in the Next Killer App bubble, I signed a lot of NDAs only to find out there wasn't anything worth disclosing. I think I am actually violating one of my NDAs to recount the time a guy offered me stock options to build a website that looked like Google with ads. It had a search bar, would return Google search results, and was otherwise riddled with ads. He got the idea from a porn search engine. I put on a suit and tie to meet with the guy. Didn't have any capital, nor did he own the domain he wanted to use, and I wasn't a web developer. But he was willing to give me 3% if I built the site for him and helped him find advertisers, because he didn't have those, either. He was an idea man, you know.

Anyway, that's not the norm anymore, and NDAs are perfunctory when protecting actual company information.

NDAs without a hard cutoff, maybe a year or two in the future, can get bent.

Especially for artists. Holy shit, do artists get screwed by NDAs. Some people's portfolios are fucking sparse despite years of doing art five days a week for years and years. If the business just kills the project - tough shit, it's a secret forever.

To the point we're still seeing people hesitant to talk about failed games from thirty years ago, even though the company is dead, and the company that bought their corpse is also dead.

If I'm signing an NDA for a first-time founder I expect their idea will start off with "It's like Facebook but for..."

NDAs more often protect strategic information than some big secret.

Stuff like when they will release something, pricing, etc. It really means nothing to 99% of the planet and will mean nothing in a month, but a competitor can use the information to make counter moves.

I feel conflicted on this one. On the one hand, most startups have absolutely shit ideas, no clue how to execute and will crumble into a pile of half delivered products. NDAs and non-competes are basically saying you promise not to tell anyone about the idea to "put ___ on the block chain", or to not work for anyone working with "machine learning" for five years.

But also... It's just asshole ragebait.

Gotta live the "ideas are cheap" stance when you know how much money some patents can be worth.

I generally agree unless the idea is actually something groundbreaking, which in 99.99% of cases, it isn't, even remotely.

When it's actually something groundbreaking, the person having the idea should have some protection to actually get rewarded for the idea.

I've been in companies where tradesecrets were stolen and it can seriously fuck a company.

The execution doesn't matter when a third party can undercut your price by 90%+.

Honestly, I agree with this.

Companies pay me to work. If they want to control my speech, i.e. tell me what I can and can't say when I'm OUT OF WORKING HOURS, then I want a part of the company.