108
submitted 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) by MojoMcJojo@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

The team hopes that this might become a powerful tool that paves the way for new quantum communication protocols that use topology as an alphabet for quantum information processing across entanglement-based channels.

The findings reported in the article are crucial because researchers have grappled for decades with developing techniques to preserve entangled states. The fact that topology remains intact even as entanglement decays suggests a potentially new encoding mechanism that utilizes entanglement, even in scenarios with minimal entanglement where traditional encoding protocols would fail.

Edit: Here is the quoted article link.

And here's is the published paper.

Edit: someone below linked to this so you don't have to pay for knowledge

top 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] DocMcStuffin@lemmy.world 24 points 10 months ago

Is there an article to go with this post? Cause this is just a couple of paragraphs that fails to link to what, where, and who is doing the research.

[-] MojoMcJojo@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago

Sorry, thought I linked it. Here it is

[-] KeenFlame@feddit.nu 4 points 10 months ago

It's confusing but I think this is the article

[-] DocMcStuffin@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

Science reporting list the authors or the institutions or the paper being published. There isn't even a DOI. So, I can't even say if any of this has gone through peer review or been published in a reputable journal. It's not really an article. The whole thing reads like OP copied a couple paragraphs out of the middle of a university press release.

[-] MojoMcJojo@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

Sorry I meant to include the link.

And here's is the link to the published paper

[-] WEFshill202@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago
[-] MojoMcJojo@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Awesome, thank you!

[-] DocMcStuffin@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

Much obliged. Thank you.

[-] ryannathans@aussie.zone 1 points 10 months ago

Not a very good one, where's the source?

[-] mathemachristian@lemm.ee 9 points 10 months ago

Well one is a physical phenomenon and one is a mathematical type of model. So without going further into the article I assume they use topology to model quantum behaviour.

Its like saying light and sine waves are inextricably linked. One is reality and one is the abstract model to help understand that reality

[-] MojoMcJojo@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Sorry for not including the link to the article. Edit: here is the published paper

[-] douglasg14b@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

You act unsurprised like this is obvious. Yet understand that light and shine waves are related is a pretty big step from not knowing it.

Assuming it without demonstration doesn't count. Anyone can assume anything. And a broken clock will always be right twice a day.

[-] mathemachristian@lemm.ee 4 points 10 months ago

My point is that "intextricably linked" makes no sense when talking about an abstract model and a real phenomenon. They aren't inextricably "linked", one is real the other isn't how could they possibly be linked. It's the person modeling reality that makes the link.

[-] Peppycito@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 months ago

a broken clock will always be right twice a day.

And sometimes even a calculator can be a clock!

[-] MojoMcJojo@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago
[-] MojoMcJojo@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

That's a great example, thank you. So we're beginning to discover a way to model of the fabric of reality?

[-] mathemachristian@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I am no physicist so I wouldn't know lol

I can tell you about topology though, its essentially a way to talk about a space where points don't have a distance to each other. By that I mean there does not exist a function to measure the distance between two points, which is fundamentally different from "all points are so close we cannot measure their distance". In the latter case a distance might still exist in reality, its just our instruments are not fine enough to detect it. What we mean however is that it makes "no sense", for whatever reason, to talk about distance. The main thing of topology then is that we can still talk about properties of a space, for example whether any two points on a surface can be connected by a path, even though they don't have a distance to eachother or to any of the points linking them.

You definitely lose a lot without the possibility to measure distance but not as much as one might expect. Another example would be that it is possible to distinguish between a torus and a sphere (or any other genus).

[-] Thekingoflorda@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

Could you maybe put the article in the URL section of the post? Makes it a bit easier to get to it (:

[-] MojoMcJojo@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

My first post, sorry about that. Should be fixed now

[-] Thekingoflorda@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

No problem, thanks for fixing!

[-] GiuseppeAndTheYeti@midwest.social 4 points 10 months ago

I understood all of these things

[-] MojoMcJojo@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

I think it's really neat when I read some obscure or esoteric science discovery and feel like I understand it. Although I know I would need years of study to maybe even begin to be able to understand how to discover that truth.

[-] solrize@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

I didn't understand it even slightly, oh well. I couldn't even tell whether this was an experimental result or just a theoretical one. That's just from the phys.org post though. I haven't looked at the Bature article.

[-] MojoMcJojo@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

Without looking this up first, I think topology is a mathematics..mathematica..a field of mathematics that makes proofs of topologies in nature. Like what is the mathematical proof of how a knot can be removed from something without untying it. Hang on let me look this up...

Okay here: Topology is the study of shapes and spaces, focusing on properties that are unchanged by continuous transformations like stretching or bending, without tearing or gluing. It's used to understand and classify various mathematical, physical, and computational phenomena.

So topology shows how a coffee cup is a misshapen donut, or a human is donut (with center hole from mouth to...butthole) and now, how quantum entangled particles can be perturbed (messed with) and still maintain coherence (not break and still be an entangled pair).

Here's the coffee cup donut:

So it sounds like they are using topology to classify entangled quantum 'shapes?' which will allow them to better understand and manipulate quantum entangled states? And so far the math is holding up?

I love this stuff. Like how the math showed that black holes should exist before we found any. It's like frickin magic man. Like wizards reading the magic symbols to unlock the secret fabric of reality, but like, for real.

[-] Peppycito@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 months ago

I find topology fascinating. I'd love to learn more about it but it quickly goes above my pay grade.

[-] LodeMike@lemmy.today 2 points 10 months ago

Cool

Would you like to name your source?

this post was submitted on 09 Jan 2024
108 points (93.5% liked)

News

23267 readers
3050 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS