this post was submitted on 12 Jan 2024
500 points (97.9% liked)

pissposting

1338 readers
1 users here now

Piss tier memes, lower than shitposts. Brain damaging stuff.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 45 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ULS@lemmy.ml 42 points 2 years ago

You forgot to add 5% gaussian blur.

[–] Zorque@kbin.social 27 points 2 years ago

Looks like you have a taller field of view with 120fps πŸ€“

[–] Bishma@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

I barely noticed the difference from 30 to 60. The screen might be sharper, but my old eyes are not.

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 11 points 2 years ago

I can't tell if this is a joke or not... The frame rate does not impact the sharpness. It just makes things like panning more clear.

The alternate slower frame rate is going to blur a lot more during the same action. Going from a high frame rate to a low one feels like reality versus a dream you're having where everything is a little harder to see, but you can't pinpoint how immediately.

[–] SorryQuick@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 years ago

Try playing first person games with a mouse. I get headaches when turning the camera too fast at too low frame rates.

[–] ElBarto@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 years ago

Pffft, your eyes can only see in 33fps....

[–] XTornado@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Ok.... But why they didn't like put asphalt or similar, they have modern stuff... Why the damn mud....

[–] BigBananaDealer@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago

rule of cool

[–] Vinny_93@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] ThirdWorldOrder@lemm.ee 13 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (5 children)

I have a racing sim and a few 240hz monitors. I don’t know if it’s my eyesight but I can’t see any difference between 240 and 120. Definitely a difference from 60 and 120 though.

sim rig

[–] HUMAN_TRASH@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago
[–] LemmyIsFantastic@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Beyond 90 and it's hard for me to tell. Very much diminishing returns.

[–] GladiusB@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Depends on the game. I have a 3090ti and most games let me rock 60 fps and everything is clear and crisp. Some games I go unlimited or up to 120.

[–] ThirdWorldOrder@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

You must be playing some ultra high end games if you can only get 60 and sometimes 120 with a 3090ti. I still use my overpriced 3080.

Are you talking about games like Cyberpunk?

[–] GladiusB@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

FFXIV is my primary. I play Fortnite with my kid and was playing fine at 120. I throw in some COD. Starfield. Forza. Star Wars. I'm probably missing something.

[–] curiousPJ@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Something about the framing, it looks like your sim rig is mounted on the ceiling.

[–] ThirdWorldOrder@lemm.ee 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

side view Different angle

[–] TwanHE@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Not everyone notices a difference ofcourse. But it doesn't even have to be in perceived "smoothness" since higher refresh monitor should also have better motion clarity which can be just as important.

[–] ThirdWorldOrder@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yeah that’s why I got the 240s for the rig. Important for racing. It’s just really not a big difference between that and 120 unless you’re really looking for it.

Same could be said about my expensive headphones too I guess lol.

[–] TwanHE@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Yeah for headphones i can relate, while i can hear the difference, after about 5 minutes of listening I no longer care and most headphones are good enough for me.

With my monitor i instantly feel whenever the 280hz mode fucks up and drops to 240hz even though it should barely make a difference. I tested it out with some friends and some couldn't see the difference between 120 and 280 while I can pretty much spot on tell what refresh rate im running except 144 vs 165hz

[–] sheogorath@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I mostly play FPS games and I can tell the difference. My ranked level literally went up 1 tier in OW2 and my K/D in CoD went up from 1.2 to 1.8.

This is when I upgraded from 144hz to 380hz monitor.

[–] ThirdWorldOrder@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

Interesting. My CoD K/D has sat at .99 for like 5 years lol. Only time I regularly had a k/d over 2 was the original MW and MW2 before I had a bunch of kids!

[–] Mordred_85@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago
[–] thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)
[–] Spider89@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

AMD Freesync gang

[–] TotalFat@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Old Disney got a reputation for quality by doubling (or more) the frame rate to 24 fps. Then Southpark comes along and taps into nostalgia for the mass produced TV animation by making their computers crank out choppy, low frame rate shows.

[–] moshtradamus666@lemmy.world -2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Above 60fps is really important if you want to play high ranks in competitive games. Other than that is just cool to have a smoother experience and you won't miss if you don't have it.

[–] abbotsbury@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Strong disagree, the smoothness afforded by high frame rates will make any game where you directly control the camera feel much better to play.