105

"Texas this week erected new barriers along part of the state's border with Mexico, blocking Border Patrol access, a court filing said on Friday, as conflict over migration escalates between the state's Republican governor and Democratic U.S. President Joe Biden. The Texas National Guard added new concertina wire and fencing to a stretch of the border near Eagle Pass, blocking U.S. Border Patrol access to a city park that contains a boat ramp agents use to reach the Rio Grande, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) said in a filing to the U.S. Supreme Court."

Further:

https://www.cnn.com/2024/01/15/us/what-we-know-about-the-drownings-of-3-migrants-in-eagle-pass-texas/index.html

"The drownings – as well as the rescue of two other migrants on the US side of the Rio Grande by Mexican authorities – “underscore that Texas is firm in its continued efforts to exercise complete control of the border and land” in the area “and to block Border Patrol’s access to the border even in emergency circumstances,” the administration wrote. "

...

"“At the very least, however, Border Patrol would have had the opportunity to take any available steps to fulfill its responsibilities and assist its counterparts in the Mexican government with undertaking the rescue mission. Texas made that impossible.” "

top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Telodzrum@lemmy.world 68 points 10 months ago

If local authorities are usurping the explicitly enumerated powers of the Federal Government, it's time to federalize the Texas National Guard.

[-] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 20 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

It really is. And in the context of what Abbot is doing, it is 100% legally justified at this point.

The incredibly shitty part is that, despite the unambiguous legality of such a hypothetical move, Biden won’t do it, because Abbot might actually use that as a political wedge. Which would be incredibly idiotic in the context of “America continuing to exist” - especially if the TXNG leadership decides to throw in with Abbot, which would effectively kick off a second civil war (which might start “cold”, but almost certainly wouldn’t end that way).

[-] newthrowaway20@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

We're already in a cold civil war and abbot already uses this as a wedge. So nothing would actually change.

[-] aew360@lemm.ee 6 points 10 months ago

And then when the commanding general will refuse the order and declare that they serve the Texas Governor, we would have official made Season 1 of Designated Survivor a reality but with a whole fuck of a lot less actual controversy and catastrophe. Just shows how fragile conservatives are when they don’t get their way

[-] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago

Stop paying them. Remove their rank and all support. Courts martial them.

[-] bluGill@kbin.social 8 points 10 months ago

Biden could solve this problem by making the existing border crossings easier/faster. Last time I was in Mexico it two 3 hours to get back into the US. Border agents could work much faster. Mexicans - like humans everywhere - are mostly nice people. IF congress won't fund more border control then just metrics for how long the line is on the agents "scan the passport, you look like the picture, no red flags in the computer so I need to keep this line moving: NEXT". Just making the legal border crossing easier would make a big difference.

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

If they want to be in texas so bad we should swing through New Mexico and take them there.

[-] AnneBonny@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 10 months ago

I can't believe that people are still trying to cross the border there.

[-] Facebones@reddthat.com 1 points 10 months ago

Guess it's time for my daily comment that Biden won't do shit because the only true crime to dems is hurting faschie feels.

this post was submitted on 17 Jan 2024
105 points (99.1% liked)

politics

19107 readers
2675 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS