698
Magic π (mander.xyz)
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] protist@mander.xyz 188 points 9 months ago

Even cooler, at 75 digits you can calculate the circumference of your mom

[-] Poggervania@kbin.social 48 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Joke’s on you, I only needed 69 digits to calculate the circumference of your dad’s cock

[-] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 70 points 9 months ago

Why would you miss the opportunity to make the web page continue computing pi to as many digits as you feel like scrolling down to expose though

[-] SzethFriendOfNimi@lemmy.world 33 points 9 months ago

Whoa. No spoilers for Contact please.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] Mango@lemmy.world 50 points 9 months ago

At work we have a scale sensitive to the 1/10,000 of a gram. 4 decimal digits. It's so sensitive it needs to be encased in a box so tiny connection currents don't make it go frantic! Even in the box the number changes a lot. 15 0s is nutty.

[-] threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works 21 points 9 months ago

connection currents

Convection currents?

[-] Mango@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago

Yes. Heckin Gboard.

[-] Donjuanme@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

Mine can tell if I'm sitting next to it's desk or not. I've come to the conclusion it's the deformation of the ground the desk is sitting on.

It's really a silly amount of precision for what I use it for. But It's so fun to lock g on .0000, even if only for a few seconds. Anyone who has a target of a specific amount of 0s can do it themselves. After the first 2 shits pretty random.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] sik0fewl@kbin.social 37 points 9 months ago

I like to use 16, just to be safe.

[-] thanks_shakey_snake@lemmy.ca 15 points 9 months ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] hansl@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

It’s a bit far off. You should round down to 3 at the very least.

[-] sag@lemm.ee 35 points 9 months ago

Haha 3 go brr

[-] Gork@lemm.ee 28 points 9 months ago

Diameter of a hydrogen atom is all well and good, but how many digits of pi will we need to be accurate to a Planck Length?

[-] nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca 20 points 9 months ago

Honestly probably not that many more. My guess since I'm too lazy to do the math is less than 100.

[-] EvilHankVenture@lemmy.world 24 points 9 months ago

The diameter of a hydrogen atom is over 10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 plank lengths.

So based on this post I have no idea.

[-] xthexder@l.sw0.com 19 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Well that's only 26 more digits, so we're probably good at 100 digits of pi. [citation needed]

[-] rasensprenger@feddit.de 15 points 9 months ago

log_10(size of observable universe / planck length) = 61.74... so like 63 digits of precision for everything are enough

[-] Malgas@beehaw.org 4 points 9 months ago

The width of a hydrogen atom is 3.1*10^24 Planck lengths. So, yeah, 65 digits of pi ought to do it.

[-] netwren@lemmy.world 27 points 9 months ago

Dope. I just memorized it to 50 digits. Good to know for my intents and purposes it doesn't matter at all anyway.

[-] EvilHankVenture@lemmy.world 22 points 9 months ago

Hey, cheer up, it doesn't matter for anyone's intents and purposes.

[-] hansl@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

No no no. The error compounds every time you math so if you math a lot at 40 digits you might end up with like 30 digits of correct precision. Totally unacceptable. Literally unplayable.

[-] GenEcon@lemm.ee 22 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Still, we can't proof that Pi^Pi^Pi^Pi is an integer or not, since we don't know enough digits.

[-] SparrowRanjitScaur@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago

It's definitely not an integer seeing as it has a fractional component. Do you mean if it's rational or not?

[-] GenEcon@lemm.ee 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

No, we can't proof if its an integer or not. If you can proof it, you are up for a great career in mathematics: https://www.spektrum.de/kolumne/ist-pi-hoch-pi-hoch-pi-hoch-pi-eine-ganze-zahl/2203268

(Unfortunately only found this german article, but maybe translation works)

[-] Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml 19 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Memory Masters destroying the last of their childhood memories so they can add another 80,000 digits of pi to their mind palace.

contextMemory Mastery is a technique where you force your brain to remember random information by formatting it in a certain way, some people have gone on to use this trick to memorize millions of digits of pi. A study recently came out confirming that every time you make a new memory it destroys an old one, so every time someone makes a "memory palace" it comes at the cost of older memories, such as in childhood.

[-] exocrinous@lemm.ee 11 points 9 months ago

A study recently came out confirming that every time you make a new memory it destroys an old one

If that was true, babies would forget their first memory every time they remember their second memory. There's no way it's true. It might be partly true, but it can't be completely true.

[-] Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml 6 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Well the way memory works is that it allocates certain clusters of neurons to storing information. When you're young there's a lot of blank space that you can store stuff in but as you get older you start having to pick and choose as more and more brain space gets taken up.

Here's a cool video on the subject: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X5trRLX7PQY Fun fact: because of how memories are formed in chains you can tell if you're on the precipice of forgetting something if you try to recall it and you start trailing into another memory. You can experience this for yourself by trying to recall the beat of an old song and note when it starts morphing into the beat of a newer song. It's also worth noting that every time you recall a memory you destroy the original and rewrite it, bringing it back to the top. That little asshole is like 90% of the reason why our memories suck so much shit and are so prone to outside manipulation.

[-] hanke@feddit.nu 7 points 9 months ago

You wouldn't happen to have that study close at hand?

I often nerd into new hobbies and learn new stuff. I also don't feel like I remember as much of my early childhood as people around me does.

I have no idéa if this is what's happening to me, but it'd be interesting to read about.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] EdibleFriend@lemmy.world 18 points 9 months ago

Math is just runes and you can't convince me otherwise.

[-] clay830@lemmy.world 14 points 9 months ago

So it's just a standard double precision floating point? Makes it seem like 15 decimal places was hand selected.

[-] Carrick1973@lemmy.world 14 points 9 months ago

There's a 9 repeating 6 times in there which I'd think is a pretty rare occurrence in pi. I wonder what the longest occurrence of a repeating digit is.

[-] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 23 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Pi is infinite so every combination/string of numbers is in there, if we calculated enough you could find a billion 2s next to each other

You can look through the first trillion here

https://archive.org/details/pi_dec_1t

Though it’s a bunch of downloading

[-] Guest_User@lemmy.world 13 points 9 months ago

Not necessarily. It could just become a series of 1's repeating forever. Nothing would require it to contain all strings of numbers.

[-] diverging@lemmy.ml 5 points 9 months ago

It could just become a series of 1’s repeating forever

If that happens in a number, then it is rational. Pi is not rational, so that will never happen in pi.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] chetradley@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago

Looked it up, and it's apparently called the Feynman point after Physicist Richard Feynman (though the story behind that attribution is disputed). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Six_nines_in_pi?wprov=sfla1

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Aermis@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

On a long enough string I'm guessing... Infinite? Pi isn't a pattern so does it follow the same "if monkeys hade an infinite amount of time to type at a typewriter they'd type Shakespeare"

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Potato_in_my_anus@lemmy.ml 10 points 9 months ago

Why stop at 1 billion?... Let's go for a trillion, just because we can.

[-] callyral@pawb.social 16 points 9 months ago

we do what we must because we can

[-] JusticeForPorygon@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

For the good of all of us, except the ones who are dead

[-] qwertychomp@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

But there's no sense crying over every mistake

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] SanndyTheManndy@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

I memorized it to a hundred digits for a bet so I'm set for life.

[-] sarmale@lemmy.zip 5 points 9 months ago

Just one more digit bro, imagine how many things youd discover bro, just one more, one more and it will be so much safer bro, It would help all mission just use 16digits bro

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 22 Jan 2024
698 points (99.0% liked)

Science Memes

10905 readers
780 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS