521
submitted 9 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

Mr Giuliani filed for bankruptcy last month after he was ordered to pay $148m to Georgia election workers he defamed

Donald Trump’s former lawyer Rudy Giuliani has listed a claim against the one-term president over unpaid legal fees in a new bankruptcy filing.

The ex-New York City mayor includes a “possible claim for unpaid legal fees against Donald J Trump.” in the 26 January filing, which states that the amount is “undetermined.”

Mr Giuliani filed for bankruptcy last month, days after a federal judge ordered him to “immediately” pay more than $148m to a pair of Georgia election workers a jury determined he defamed.

Mr Giuliani represented Mr Trump in a string of unsuccessful lawsuits contesting the results of the 2020 election that he lost to Joe Biden.

Mr Trump’s legal fees owed to Mr Giuliani have previously been reported. The New York Times wrote in August 2023 that “Mr Trump has never explicitly told Mr Giuliani why he is effectively stiffing him, but the former president has pointed out that he lost the cases related to the election.”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 117 points 9 months ago

looks like giuliani better get really comfortable in the bed he made

[-] jballs@sh.itjust.works 82 points 9 months ago

Under “tax refunds owed to you,” the filing also mentions “Overpayment of taxes from The Mask Singer” in California for more than $10,000. Mr Giuliani performed on “The Masked Singer” in 2022, in which he sang “Bad to the Bone.”

This timeline is just too weird.

[-] scottywh@lemmy.world 22 points 9 months ago

I'm really curious how much the shit stain got paid for the one or two episodes on the Masked Singer that it could be possible to have overpaid his taxes related to it by over $10K.

[-] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 22 points 9 months ago

Do you think reality has writers strikes

[-] ouRKaoS@lemmy.today 9 points 9 months ago

Apparently our reality is being written by a crappy AI

[-] ramenshaman@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago

I really enjoyed the first couple seasons of that show but then it abruptly went downhill pretty fast.

[-] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 53 points 9 months ago

(starts the popcorn)

[-] TheCelticPirate@lemmy.world 49 points 9 months ago

Everybody predicted this but him. Trump never pays!

[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 44 points 9 months ago

https://www.nytimes.com/1993/12/16/nyregion/giuliani-challenges-ems-at-accident.html

Back in the day, Rudy slandered an EMS crew because they were following the established protocols.

He never apologized, and actually tried to play off that he was 'saving' the patient.

[-] herrwoland@lemmy.world 44 points 9 months ago

I swear it's getting harder and harder to guess which news article is from The Onion and which one is not lol

[-] SPRUNT@lemmy.world 13 points 9 months ago

In this case, an article from The Onion wouldn't be nearly as funny.

[-] BossDj@lemm.ee 42 points 9 months ago

"Rudy Giuliani listed a claim against the one-term president"

Ha!

[-] Nastybutler@lemmy.world 14 points 9 months ago

I caught that too. Nice little jab in case Orange Julius Caesar reads it

[-] Riccosuave@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

Alright, this is the only Trump nickname I can actually fuck with. All the other ones are pretty cringe to me, but this one I like.

[-] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 9 months ago

Not even Cheeto Mussolini?

OJC is pretty solid though. Especially while his buddies are (possibly) stabbing him in the back.

[-] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 1 points 9 months ago

I thought that was funny, so I checked the source again, leaving me disappointed - feeling that they were just providing context for international readers.

Am I wrong (it was indeed a jab over the Stop The Steal mindset)?

[-] BossDj@lemm.ee 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

The article, if I recall, used multiple such phrases in lieu of pronouns and articles just to make the story flow a little more nicely.

Still made me snort.

[-] NegativeLookBehind@kbin.social 30 points 9 months ago

If only there had been some previous examples of Trump not paying people, maybe this could've been avoided?

[-] tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 28 points 9 months ago

I didn’t know you could not pay your lawyers if they lose. Neat.

[-] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 24 points 9 months ago
[-] SupraMario@lemmy.world 15 points 9 months ago

This is good though, it means the infighting has started to finally reach the top. The rats will eat each other now.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

checks watch

C’mon, c’mon!

[-] aew360@lemm.ee 23 points 9 months ago

If he agrees to testify for immunity or a reduced sentence, Trump would be fucked

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

Too late for that

[-] MushuChupacabra@lemmy.world 21 points 9 months ago

Oh no, he's not getting paid!

[-] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 17 points 9 months ago

He doesn't even know how much he's not getting paid apparently

[-] Nastybutler@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

I thought that was weird too. What kind of attorney doesn't keep track of his billable hours? Oh, right. We're talking about Gouliani

[-] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago
[-] Riccosuave@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

Fucking lol. Also, love your username 👍

[-] nonailsleft@lemm.ee 1 points 9 months ago

Hopefully for him: at least 148 mil

[-] Steve@lemmy.world 21 points 9 months ago

How was this guy a mayor?
Trump has a decades long history of not paying his debts. I assumed all his lawyers would insist on payment in full first.

[-] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 16 points 9 months ago

He was able to ride high off of 9/11.

[-] pandapoo@sh.itjust.works 19 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

He was mayor during 9/11, not because of it.

That aside, you're right about him coasting off 9/11 for quite a while. His failed Presidential bid was basically him spamming "9/11” from start, to finish.

He had the same problem as Meatball Ron: the more the GOP base voters heard him and saw him, the more they were repulsed by him.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Bristlecone@lemmy.world 16 points 9 months ago

Jesus fucking christ this is good shit, LMAO!

[-] cashews_best_nut@lemmy.world 14 points 9 months ago

Is this a leopard face-eating incident?

[-] BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works 4 points 9 months ago

More like an "oh no, the ass kisser is biting"

[-] twistypencil@lemmy.world 14 points 9 months ago

Idiots confused by idiocy, how idiotic

[-] PrincessLeiasCat@sh.itjust.works 12 points 9 months ago
[-] recapitated@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago
[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago

LOL, Roodles. Did he figure out the leopard bit his face?

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

Alcohol’s a helluva drug.

[-] autotldr 6 points 9 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Donald Trump’s former lawyer Rudy Giuliani has listed a claim against the one-term president over unpaid legal fees in a new bankruptcy filing.

The ex-New York City mayor includes a “possible claim for unpaid legal fees against Donald J Trump.” in the 26 January filing, which states that the amount is “undetermined.”

Mr Giuliani filed for bankruptcy last month, days after a federal judge ordered him to “immediately” pay more than $148m to a pair of Georgia election workers a jury determined he defamed.

The newspaper reported that the former president told his aides that he didn’t want Mr Giuliani to receive “a dime” unless he succeeded in the case, and noted that $340,000 had been paid to Mr Giuliani — through Trump’s Save America PAC — to cover some of his ex-lawyer’s legal debt.

The filing shows that “Joseph Biden Defamation Action” is also listed for an “undetermined” amount after Mr Giuliani sued the president in October after he used the phrase “Russian pawn” during a presidential debate in 2020.

But the record also shows the fund has spent more than $500,000 on his legal fees, leaving $180,000 in cash on hand.


The original article contains 384 words, the summary contains 193 words. Saved 50%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[-] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

You know, this may well be an avenue in which to undermine Trump's desire to return to presidency. He still has a base, but you attack his wealth including his crony's, and to try to make his candidacy financially unsustainable. Noam Chomsky said how much money you can throw at election campaigning is what ultimately dictates whether you could win or not.

[-] Son_of_dad@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago

Noam Chomsky also told us to mind our own business and shut up, when asked about his dealings with Jeffrey Epstein.

[-] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

I thought you were joking. But after Googling, he had some associations with Epstein 😲

[-] Son_of_dad@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

Many people have met Epstein etc and have done nothing shady, those people generally come out and say they only met him for dinner, etc. Chomsky didn't say "I barely knew him and met for dinner" or some defense. When asked, Chomsky said "none of your business what my dealings with Epstein were" which to me is very damning

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

You’re not wrong, but context is important. Jerkass interviewer trying to force a gotcha moment runs with “he told me to shut up! Omg guilty”

Epstein sleazed around a LOT of places, notably science and university circles. Bill Barr’s dad knows.

I prefer to bag on Chomsky for not supporting Ukraine.

[-] linearchaos@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

Slight twist here He's not looking for the presidency. His goal is to get in disable the Justice Department and the Executive Department and turn it into a mini dictatorship. If he manages to get in he doesn't have any money problems anywhere.

To be honest, none of this is really hitting him anyway. He owes shit tons of money to so many people, He's just not going to pay any of them.

I also suspect he's able to work this in a way where campaign finance isn't quite as big of a deal. He already gets absolute free coverage for everything he does. If he didn't rally in campaign in every red state would that really affect his base significantly? If he did really would it change any significant number of mines that wouldn't vote for otherwise? The people who are or aren't voting for him at this point already understand his goals. He could probably rally these people's effectively on a YouTube video as he could in person

[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

We was old, and needed the money...

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 27 Jan 2024
521 points (98.9% liked)

politics

19104 readers
2460 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS