32
submitted 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) by Rapidcreek@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world
all 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago

This is actually pretty huge. Not only is Smartmatic's civil case stronger tham Dominion's (for both FOX and OAN), this should drive a stake through the heart of OAN.

[-] ForestOrca@kbin.social 1 points 7 months ago

Best news I've seen all day. Go get 'em Smartmatic!!

[-] OhStopYellingAtMe@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

They’re gonna own OAN.

[-] Zugyuk@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago
[-] moon@lemmy.cafe 2 points 7 months ago

Not surprising, but I hope it gives them solid evidence to shut them the fuck down

[-] ItsAFake@lemmus.org 2 points 7 months ago

Yeah and I may have engaged in getting really stoned before work today.

[-] KnightontheSun@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago

I am sure, despite that, you’ll get the train there on time.

[-] ItsAFake@lemmus.org 1 points 7 months ago

Nah I drove, works only 2 minutes away.

[-] ripcord@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

You see, the joke is that you work as a train driver but we're doing it while stoned

[-] ItsAFake@lemmus.org 2 points 7 months ago

Shit, my bad! I may have engaged a few more times throughout my day.

[-] philz@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

Not surprised in the slightest! Hopefully Smartmatic wins the case

[-] Makeitstop@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

Win, and not just settle for a check and a press release that will never be seen by people who actually watch those networks.

[-] blazeknave@lemmy.world -1 points 7 months ago

You really couldn't afford to renew the lease?

[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world -1 points 7 months ago

I don't know if any one here has ever read the book, but seeing as to the company, I think probably maybe some; but consider the following quote from the left hand of darkness:

“I’m afraid that Argaven also believes you. But he does not trust you. In part because he no longer trusts me. I have made mistakes, been careless. I cannot ask for your trust any longer, either, having put you in jeopardy. I forgot what a king is, forgot that the king in his own eyes is Karhide, forgot what patriotism is and that he is, of necessity, the perfect patriot. Let me ask you this, Mr. Ai: do you know, by your own experience, what patriotism is?”

“No,” I said, shaken by the force of that intense personality suddenly turning itself wholly upon me. “I don’t think I do. If by patriotism you don’t mean the love of one’s homeland, for that I do know.”

“No, I don’t mean love, when I say patriotism. I mean fear. The fear of the other. And its expressions are political, not poetical: hate, rivalry, aggression. It grows in us, that fear. It grows in us year by year. We’ve followed our road too far. And you, who come from a world that outgrew nations centuries ago, who hardly know what I’m talking about, who show us the new road—” He broke off. After a while he went on, in control again, cool and polite: “It’s because of fear that I refuse to urge your cause with the king, now. But not fear for myself, Mr. Ai. I’m not acting patriotically. There are, after all, other nations on Gethen.”

If you want to have a fighting chance against an opponent, you need to understand them. To predict what these people, and their followers, how they will conduct themselves, you must understand, that they themselves, in their minds, they are the 'state', the 'law', the 'perfect patriot'. This principal extends to all aspects of their morality. What is moral is defined by what they themselves do.

[-] Jayu@lemm.ee -2 points 7 months ago

I am uncomfortable with the idea of being held responsible for them circulating this data - if they did not illegally obtain it, can it be said to be the case that they are violating rights by presenting it..? Unless, of course, they believed they were functioning passwords and it was part of a further operation to continue using the information to breach the company's data.

It could potentially be seen simply as verification of some element of a news story - like how we have seen the publication of names / email addresses / passwords etc. of Nazi websites be leaked, often after the sites have been taken down, simply as part of verifying that the site was legit taken down, the site was populated by actual people, etc.

I also do not think it is good to take down "far right" news media that isn't even really far right. OAN, Newsmax, etc., are certainly conservative, but what would we really be even doing if we were to take down mid-stream conservative Trumpist outlets..? Driving more people towards news sites like Unz and platforms like Gab. Make it impossible for them to have larger networks in the free marketplace of ideas, and then you drive them into the arms of smaller & more radical networks.

I am not a Leftist, but I wouldn't think of this as a leftist W unless your idea of a W is serving the short-term interests of the DNC.

[-] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 0 points 7 months ago

Agreed! We shouldn't punish people who Break The Law if it hurts the People I Like (White Rich Christians)!

[-] Jayu@lemm.ee 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I love everybody bro

But no, seriously, I see no reason to believe they ordered the hack, or that they believed the passwords would continue the illegal exploitation of private information.

I see no reason why people who shared the hacked data of a Nazi website would be prosecuted as if they are malicious hackers themselves.

So, why?

this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2024
32 points (97.1% liked)

politics

18883 readers
5434 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS