464
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] ptz@dubvee.org 88 points 8 months ago

So all the other stuff was fine and that was the last straw?

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 57 points 8 months ago

He's a Mormon. Sex is what matters to them.

[-] ptz@dubvee.org 23 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

So January 6 should have been sexier? /s

Edit: I thought this was a fun, snarky comment but after seeing some of the replies, I regret making it 😆

[-] thefartographer@lemm.ee 6 points 8 months ago

MTG is the insurrectionist who penetrated deep into the government

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 10 points 8 months ago

Ironically, I’ve had lots of gay sex with Mormons.

[-] JaymesRS@literature.cafe 12 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

As long as you were only soaking and someone else jump-humped it doesn’t count. That’s the 2nd of God’s loopholes.

[-] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 4 points 8 months ago

He kept his special underwear on to protect him from the gay waves. Just remember to spit.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago

Mormons of all sexualities have a lot of sex, especially when they're teenagers. They just repress all of that later and feel super guilty about it.

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 5 points 8 months ago

Teenagers are going to hump each others' brains out. No religion will ever change that.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] billiam0202@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

I think you mean, the lack of sex is what matters to them. 🤣

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago

I don't know, their five wives and 33 kids might suggest otherwise.

[-] Talaraine@kbin.social 17 points 8 months ago

Baby steps man, baby steps. The fact that one of the has a line is a start.

[-] Microw@lemm.ee 5 points 8 months ago

Romney clearly didnt vote for Trump in 2020 either, he wanted to impeach him last I remember.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 39 points 8 months ago

You can always count on Mitt Romney to uphold the bare minimum standards of ethics.

[-] Seasoned_Greetings@lemm.ee 14 points 8 months ago

I hate that I have to say the bare minimum ethics is the gold star standard for republicans right now.

[-] No_Eponym@lemmy.ca 4 points 8 months ago

Have you heard of the All-American prophet? The blonde-haired, blue-eyed voice of God!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] squiblet@kbin.social 36 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

It's always amazing where some Republicans draw the line. Overt racism? Bizarre incoherence? Trying to overturn an election with a riot? Spousal assault previously documented in court? Paying off prostitutes with campaign money? Trying to use federal foreign aid money to start a fake smear campaign on an opponent? Calling up state election officials and pressuring them to create a bullshit election investigation? Politicizing public health because you're vain about your weird makeup? Mocking disabled people? Having Russian officials over to the White House and destroying the translator's notes? Saying things about women like "bleeding out of her whatever"? Demonstrating a pattern of fraudulent accounting for decades? No problem. But this ONE thing, that's too much.

[-] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 16 points 8 months ago

That's how you can tell it's performative and carefully chosen

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 21 points 8 months ago

The last somewhat normal repub dirtbag. Stopped clock.

[-] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 35 points 8 months ago

It's easy to find Romney supporting something you agree with, because he's taken both sides of most issues. He seems reasonable now in comparison to Trump and the MAGA dipshits, but that's a really low bar we should ignore.

[-] Wrench@lemmy.world 10 points 8 months ago

Changing your mind can be a good thing, if your decision is based on new facts and a change in public opinion.

Changing your mind because wealthy doners tell you to is not.

I honestly don't care to dive into Romneys past enough to figure out which is which. But changing one's mind over a lifetime in politics is probably a good thing.

[-] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 11 points 8 months ago

I don't need to dive into anything, I lived through his career. He was progressive in Massachusetts when it served him to be so. He was regressive in Utah when it served him to be so. He is the quintessential slimeball politician, constantly asking where his people are going so that he might lead them there.

He also put his dog in a crate on top of his car and went on a road trip. So he's definitely a piece of shit any way you slice it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

Almost like he's a conservative. Not a Republican but picked a party because you have to if you want your votes/political career to go anywhere. It would be fair to say both conservatives and liberals alike do not appreciate sexual assault / rape. The Republican party just closed it's eyes or looks away because it will hit their political strength to acknowledge all the scumbags in their party

[-] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

To be a conservative is to grow your political beliefs around your identity. Every conservative is the same in this regard, and that is how you end up with wildly disparate conservative values. The first decision a conservative makes is who is included in the "self." Then they decide what policies and positions best benefit the self. This has always been true of every conservative who ever lived.

The problem they have right now is that Trump has made himself the only "self" that matters, and supporting him is the only path to power the Republican party has. All who have opposed him were made to kneel or be destroyed. Even Romney supported Trump when it was politically expedient. Romney tried to wrest control of the GOP away from Trump and failed, and look at him now.

The party must support Trump, because to abandon him now is to admit to the grift. They would have to acknowledge that he isn't the messiah, and then the in-fighting begins. Because suddenly they would need to redefine the self, and whoever wins gets to set the values of the party.

[-] Lemminary@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago

Damn, remember when he was one of the "evil" ones? Now look at us, almost taking his side and desperately hoping a new wave Republican doesn't summon an incubus as their running mate.

[-] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 17 points 8 months ago

You can definitely trust a Republican to do what they said they would /s

[-] GluWu@lemm.ee 4 points 8 months ago

Well, only after they've checked out of politics. Romney was republican tumor in the colon of the government that decided to detach and get shit out. If tumors this large are just deciding to fall out, this is beyond stage 4.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] kandoh@reddthat.com 14 points 8 months ago

Guys in this thread are expecting too much from a headline and too much from what was probably a casual interview while walking to a meeting.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 14 points 8 months ago

Seriously, just how deep does the cult programming go that it takes SO MUCH for cons to even SAY that they won't vote for this monster?

And, FFS, why do they have to be so cagey about it? Most of them either say they are going wait and see, etc., or that they'll vote third party. That's not really better. They need to come right out and say it - tiny d is a monster and supporting him is supporting fascism and they are voting Democratic.

[-] oakey66@lemmy.world 11 points 8 months ago

That’s the disqualification??? lol. Republicans are just handmaidens for fascism at this point. Democrats are handmaidens for oligarchy. And before anyone jumps in to defend some of Biden’s very good pro labor positions/policies/staff selections; yes, I know. But if the NLRB is dismantled by the SC, all of it will be for nothing.

[-] Pratai@lemmy.ca 9 points 8 months ago

Yeah… I wouldn’t vote for a rapist either.

load more comments (23 replies)
[-] Kit@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I'll never forget when Romney was speaking to an audience of supporters when he was running against Obama, and someone asked about Obama being a foreigner with a fake birth certificate. Romney very gently assured the woman that Obama was an American, and would make a great president even though they disagreed on policies. It's that kind of professionalism that we need to bring back to politics today.

Edit: It seems that I was conflating McCain and Romney. Here's a video to make up for my blunder. https://youtu.be/dX_1B0w7Hzc?si=bUFcURfGMpTowOtT

[-] Whirlgirl9@kbin.social 40 points 8 months ago

I only recall McCain doing that. not Romney.

[-] mean_bean279@lemmy.world 20 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

That was definitely McCain doing it. However Romney did call out Russia being our greatest threat still and Obama mocked him in the debate for it. 2 years later they “annexed” Crimea and 10 years later they cause the largest war in Europe. Obama failed on international policy regarding a lot of “enemies” and either underestimating them or treating them with kid gloves in the hope of improving relations.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Kit@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 8 months ago

That may be it. My memory is failing.

[-] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 5 points 8 months ago

No worries.

Romney did tie his family dog to the roof of thier car while on a vacation road trip. So he's uh got that going for him.

[-] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago

I really do miss that veneer of social fabric on things

[-] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago

Yeah that wasn't Romney

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 16 Feb 2024
464 points (97.9% liked)

politics

19072 readers
3806 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS