[-] CoggyMcFee@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

I’ve noted that you are a superior human who doesn’t waste your time with celebrity nonsense. I assume that’s what you were going for with this comment.

[-] CoggyMcFee@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

It is genuinely amazing. I have watched it multiple times since I first saw it! It feels like something that would be funny but should get old after a few minutes, and yet it never does.

The whole talk appears to be done in one continuous take!

[-] CoggyMcFee@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Totally agree. Even back in the 70s, the wonderful feminist movie/record Free To Be You and Me (with songs like “It’s All Right to Cry” sung by an NFL player) was at least as much about men not being defined a certain way as it was about women.

I think one hurdle for men right off the bat is the fact that it’s called “feminism”. That makes it clear that it has something to offer women, but doesn’t make it obvious that it has something to offer men too, so they don’t give it an open mind.

(I’m not actually saying that I think the name should change, and in fact the movement could potentially drift away from its core mission over time if the name didn’t have women as the focus. Just saying it’s a hurdle.)

[-] CoggyMcFee@lemmy.world 0 points 6 days ago

I don’t think anybody is hoping to convince you True Believers who have fully incorporated this into your personality. The spoiler effect is more about other people who maybe haven’t thought about it so much and don’t realize the mistake they are making.

[-] CoggyMcFee@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

If true, that would be exactly why you would need more than the exact bare minimum number of Democrats for what you want to accomplish, so that one or two can’t make a name for themselves by gumming up the works.

[-] CoggyMcFee@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Are you a person who doesn’t appreciate the significance of the ACA, or are you a person that doesn’t realize that the supermajority only lasted something like 11 weeks (during which they managed to barely get the ACA to happen)?

[-] CoggyMcFee@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

It’s bad! I just don’t know what to do about it

[-] CoggyMcFee@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago

A solid chunk of the population always behaves like sheep, even with the opportunity to educate oneself and form one’s own opinion, as well as people warning them not to behave like sheep. I certainly don’t know how to stop this from happening on a mass scale. So, when some chunk of the population takes a cue from a famous person, if that person has intentions that seem benevolent and point people towards what I consider to be a wise choice, I can at least be glad about that.

[-] CoggyMcFee@lemmy.world 86 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I wasn’t shocked at all (except the general shock that a person like this has ever come close to the presidency). Particularly in recent years, I’ve seen him take bait so many times which wasn’t even intended as bait, but it triggered him. And because it slightly grazed his fragile ego, priority number one for him is to go on an ego-defending tangent that only confuses and undermines any points he could have made about the actual topic.

Harris knew that as long as she peppered her responses with a trigger here and a trigger there, he would be unable to help himself every time. And that’s what we saw.

[-] CoggyMcFee@lemmy.world 88 points 1 month ago

“That was some weird shit.”

— George W. Bush after Trump’s inauguration speech

[-] CoggyMcFee@lemmy.world 157 points 4 months ago

*Because of one issue that Trump explicitly said he would do much much worse with

24
submitted 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) by CoggyMcFee@lemmy.world to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

For example, if it says “bear left” versus “turn left”, what process is it using to make that nuanced judgment?

I see two possible ways:

a) It analyzes the map visually and has an algorithm to decide, based on the angle/curve/etc, which way to describe the turn.

b) Every place where two roads meet has metadata keyed in, indicating what type of turn it is in each direction.

I think option (a) is too expensive to be done in real-time by the end-user’s GPS, so most likely if option (a) is used, it’s done periodically on the server side to generate metadata as in option (b). And then perhaps this metadata is hand-checked by a person, and things the analysis gets wrong are overridden by a person, but all of this is just speculation on my part.

This question came up when some turn-by-turn directions incorrectly said to “bear left” at a standard, right angle intersection. I wondered if someone keyed something in wrong or if there is some little blip in the way the map was drawn at the intersection that we wouldn’t visually detect, but threw off the turn-by-turn.

I expected to easily find an article spelling it out, but I haven’t been able to and it’s driving me crazy not knowing for certain!

[-] CoggyMcFee@lemmy.world 112 points 1 year ago

This guy will literally say anything if he thinks it will get him what he wants.

view more: next ›

CoggyMcFee

joined 1 year ago