183
all 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] ctkatz@lemmy.ml 53 points 9 months ago

wow, they're really got the pulse of black america by focusing on the hot button issues like checks notes the price of menthol cigarettes.

say nothing about improving education, making going to the doctor more affordable, and the overwhelming targeting by police in black areas.

cigarettes.

are they going to do something about making malt liquor more available?

tell me you don't have a clue about black america issues without telling me you don't have a clue about black america issues.

[-] VelvetStorm@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago

say nothing about improving education, making going to the doctor more affordable, and the overwhelming targeting by police in black areas.

But they don't want them to be educated or healthier. They want them stupid, fat, and poor so they don't fight back. It was and new will be about trying to win them over by helping them.

[-] LEDZeppelin@lemmy.world 27 points 9 months ago

If conservative group need cheap disinformation tricks to suppress black vote in order to win South Carolina, repubes have already lost the plot. Bigly.

[-] dudinax@programming.dev 6 points 9 months ago

Au contrare, Republicans never leave a rat un-fucked. This is just one among many methods they've been using for years to suppress southern black votes.

[-] Seasoned_Greetings@lemm.ee 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Serious question. When was the last time republicans had a good grasp on "the plot"? That is to say, when was the last time these people exhibited at least a modicum of actual governance?

Was it around the beginning of Obama's second term when they all went off the rails obstructionist and party-before-country?

Those were the days when Romney was considered the looney tune of the GOP, now he's the one talking sense. And his stance hasn't really changed.

That was over 10 years ago... Have republicans really not had the plot in over a decade?

[-] doggle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 25 points 9 months ago

They're targeting black voters in S. Carolina over a proposed ban on menthol cigarettes. Setting aside that the state is almost certainly going red regardless, I doubt this will be a terribly effective strategy with anyone but the oldest black voters. Even then, it seems like a stretch.

[-] someguy3@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago

A conservative group funded by anonymous donors sent mailers to approximately 75,000 Democratic primary voters in South Carolina, a heavily Black electorate, ahead of the Feb. 3 primary there, criticizing Biden over his administration's push to ban menthol cigarettes. Black smokers are more likely to use menthol cigarettes, according to research cited by the FDA, and the potential ban has divided civil rights groups.

[-] invertedspear@lemm.ee 5 points 9 months ago

How is this not an onion article?

[-] Hadriscus@lemm.ee 2 points 9 months ago
this post was submitted on 21 Feb 2024
183 points (96.0% liked)

politics

19107 readers
2883 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS