~~"Controversial Influencer..."~~ I think you meant, "Alleged rapist, human trafficker, organized-crime participant, and confirmed misogynist Tate..."
Yeah theres no room for the libel law excuse on this one, Tate was literally tried for this stuff.
That wouldn't be an issue even if they weren't tried. Alleged is one of those words that you can add to make it factually correct, as long as someone is making the allegations. Repotrting on facts is always fine (in the US at least). Now the person making the allegations could be libeling them, but not the group reporting it.
But if the reporting organization knows that the person making allegations is libelous then they're also guilty of it. Again, though, none of that matters in the context of Tate.
'Fucking rat criminal and his fucking rat criminal brother get what's coming to them'
A much better headline
Collectively, they almost have one whole chin.
And the brother is still (marginally) less ugly.
If these shitheads actually go to jail, it’s prob be one of best days to come tbh. Less misogyny and stupid indoctrination to young people esp young impressionable teenage boys.
Unfortunately I think it would play into victim complexes, and someone else would take their place quickly enough.
I think so too, Tate has proven how profitable this can be.
Have you ever looked into the “manosphere?” Because there is already a sea of Tate-adjacent unwashed taints already taking up that mantle
I haven’t, but this doesn’t surprise me at all. Tons of money to be made manipulating insecure men.
As Romanian I really want these fuckers out of my country and never hear about them.
If they're found guilty in Romania, would they have to serve their sentence there and then be extradited to the UK to have another trial, and possibly serve another sentence?
According to the blurb, they'll be transferred to the UK after the trial in Romania. Even if they're found guilty in Romania first. They'll then have a trial in the UK. If they're also found guilty there, Romania and the UK will come up with an agreement on which prison gets him first.
Split them in half?
Guillotine is not on the cards unfortunately at this stage
buzzsaw it is then
This is probably Romania looking for some diplomatic back scratching. It really depends on what agreement the UK and Romania come to. Also there are a number of other outcomes that are deep in the negotiations.
Maybe UK wants first crack? I don't think there's anything stopping Romania from extraditing them, then once they've (hopefully) served their sentences, requesting they be extradited back.
These two have the weakest chins I've ever seen. Slider all the way to 0 on the chin stat in the character creator.
They look like Fable NPCs
hope those little ratfaced cunts serve a long time!
I hope the lawyers crawl up in their colon, set up a bonfire and pitch a tent.
Get rekt you no-chin having bald beta bitch
I'm bald.
But do you have a chin?
Yes, but many don't.
That’s definitely a totally natural hairline right there.
I mean, I unfortunately have a similar hairline and it's natural. Can't say it doesn't look weird though
Yes
Ha ha ha
Yes
Now they can come to the UK and be given 6 year sentences suspended for 15 years because there isn't enough room in the prisons
Bring them over to the US, we always have money for new prisons and are experimenting with new forms of state murder with horribly insufficient oversight
So you can do what? Elect him President?
I hear the renditions are quite extraordinary.
Its too late. Their hate is out their, propogating.
Eh. The Romanian charges were for sex trafficking, which their horde of incels don't actually mind.
The UK charges they fled include rape in addition to human trafficking.
Thats cool, but it won't stop the incoming wave of incels these two created. My point wasn't it is too late for Justice. My point was they've already built far too many followers for their ideas to die with them. We're stuck with these brainwashed people.
World News
A community for discussing events around the World
Rules:
-
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
-
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
-
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
-
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
-
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
-
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
-
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
-
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
Lemmy World Partners
News !news@lemmy.world
Politics !politics@lemmy.world
World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world
Recommendations
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
- Consider including the article’s mediabiasfactcheck.com/ link