193

A far-right member of the school board in a Texas town, who has been on a crusade to ban books, was censured on Wednesday night for allegedly lying to gain access to a high school library.

The 5-2 vote to reprimand Karen Lowery came after dozens of residents of Granbury—evenly divided between those who were appalled by her actions and those who defended her—spoke during a five-hour meeting about what’s being called Librarygate.

all 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 64 points 1 year ago

Hmmm. Entering a school under false pretenses, sneaking around in the dark.

Sounds pretty pedophileish to me.

[-] Treczoks@kbin.social 58 points 1 year ago

Texas - Right Wing - Karen - Lying - Book Banning

BINGO!

[-] robbotlove@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

congrats. I've got Texas - Right Wing - Karen - Lying - Book Burning. my turn is coming.

[-] Treczoks@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago
[-] JustZ@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

They already do it at alt right rallies, while chanting "zeig heil."

These people have underdeveloped brains.

[-] Madison420@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Give a bit of cyclical history "the South burning".

[-] Ashyr@sh.itjust.works 34 points 1 year ago

It's entirely interesting that she quotes God, saying, "Vengeance is mine." As though that somehow justifies taking matters into her own hands. That's precisely what the quote is saying she shouldn't do.

I guess it makes sense that reading and comprehension aren't her strong suit.

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

What is the point of an imaginary friend if it doesn't hate what you hate? There is no god there was no Jesus.

[-] betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago

The most surprising part is that she didn't burst into flames immediately upon entering a room full of books.

[-] DevOops@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

Of course her name is Karen

[-] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Are we sure? Maybe that's just an alias she uses to sneak into school libraries to read porn.

[-] PenIsland@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

WWJD? He'd spend time with the kids talking to them and being a good example in the open. Jesus never skulked that I know of.

Part of the good word talks about buckets of horse cum. Teach the good word!

[-] DrPop@lemmy.one 7 points 1 year ago

Can we come up with a new suffix? I'm tired of things ending in hate, I wasn't even alive during that administration.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

In fairness, they were caught sneaking around in the dark after illegally entering.

[-] drbluefall@toast.ooo 1 points 1 year ago

I think it's just ingrained in the public consciousness, now, even beyond the United States. Kinda like how so many things have been called "the Dark Souls of ____".

[-] TwoGems@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

The only thing that should be banned are fascists

this post was submitted on 25 Aug 2023
193 points (98.5% liked)

politics

18904 readers
3203 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS