120
submitted 6 months ago by vegeta@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world
all 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 50 points 6 months ago

“Corrupt judge minimally follows clear law interpretation to avoid ejection from case and judicial sanctions.”

[-] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 36 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Anyone else feel like they're stuck in a time loop with articles like this?

That fucker's been dealt so many 'blows' that if we stuck a wind turbine to his face we'd have an unlimited source of energy.

I'm so sick of the legal circus surrounding Trump. Put the traitor in prison already - it is the ONLY blow that matters.

[-] GingeyBook@lemm.ee 2 points 6 months ago

if we stuck a wind turbine to his face we'd have an unlimited source of energy.

But what about the birds??

[-] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

They can have their fill.

[-] DogPeePoo@lemm.ee 27 points 6 months ago

Trump's defense team had argued that the 32-count indictment against Trump should be dismissed because the statute on which they are based, the Espionage Act, is too vague to be applied

Jesus paddle-boarding Christ. SMH.

[-] AlbinoPython@lemmy.world 18 points 6 months ago

The fact that there was even a hearing on this is a 'win' for that orange fuck head.

[-] geekworking@lemmy.world 15 points 6 months ago

His only play is to use endless motions, no matter how absurd, to keep delaying in the hopes that he gets back in office to follow through on his dictatorship promise and pardon himself or install cronies to all justice department positions to drop all cases.

[-] Zeppo@sh.itjust.works 12 points 6 months ago

It would be great to be pleasantly surprised by the judge in this case.

[-] autotldr 4 points 6 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


The judge overseeing Donald Trump's classified documents case denied one of the former president's motions to have his federal charges dismissed.

Judge Aileen Cannon, a Trump appointee, said in an order on Thursday that the questions at the heart of the case are best decided in "connection with jury-instruction briefing."

Trump's defense team had argued that the 32-count indictment against Trump should be dismissed because the statute on which they are based, the Espionage Act, is too vague to be applied.

Prosecutors say that Trump mishandled classified materials and obstructed officials' efforts to obtain the documents after leaving the White House.

The former president has pleaded not guilty to all charges included in his indictment.

This is a developing story and will be updated when more information becomes available.


The original article contains 129 words, the summary contains 129 words. Saved 0%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

this post was submitted on 14 Mar 2024
120 points (94.1% liked)

politics

18883 readers
5996 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS