276

Seriously. The thread has a plot thicker than a soap opera.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] stinerman@midwest.social 83 points 8 months ago

We feel shame at being naked because people have told us to be ashamed of certain areas of our body. It's completely learned. Very young children run around without clothes on with no shame because they haven't learned it yet.

[-] leraje@lemmy.blahaj.zone 60 points 8 months ago

I don't feel ashamed, but I often feel cold.

[-] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 3 points 8 months ago

I like my nether region to not freeze and fall off.

[-] funkajunk@lemm.ee 17 points 8 months ago

My youngest thinks it hilarious to be naked 🤷‍♂️

[-] _cnt0@sh.itjust.works 8 points 8 months ago

I was told that you haven't learned the joy of parenthood until you've struggled for 10 minutes to get a kid into clothes, only for it to get out of them on their own in 10 seconds.

I remember thinking it was hilarious.

Out of the bath, down the hall, run around the living room screaming "rudie nudie!"

[-] Pan_Ziemniak@midwest.social 3 points 8 months ago

Fitting username

[-] superfes@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago

Shhh, you're ruining the vibe...

[-] prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works 5 points 8 months ago

I was pretty sure we wear clothes to protect ourselves from the elements. They’re tools. Were tool ~~monkeys~~ apes.

[-] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 5 points 8 months ago

Plenty of African tribes run around with their tits out.

They haven't learned it, and probably never need it either.

[-] Default_Defect@midwest.social 66 points 8 months ago

The bible is the truth because the bible says the bible is the truth, checkmate.

[-] Pilferjinx@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago

And God declared "Let this cloth cover your shame! Wait.. we're not at that part yet. Here's a tree that grows food which you cant eat."

[-] hellfire103@lemmy.ca 51 points 8 months ago

...or maybe because a) you christians told us it was shameful, or b) it gets really fucking cold outside of Africa*.

^*where our species originally came from^

[-] prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works 19 points 8 months ago
[-] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 5 points 8 months ago

Sure, clothes are tools, but where does shame over nudity come from? Like, a hammer is a tool, but I'm not embarrassed about being caught in public without my hanmer.

[-] Halasham@dormi.zone 3 points 8 months ago

These could come from selection pressure. In a survival scenario being caught in the rain while nude can lead to death. Minor cuts can become infected and do the same. Both can be mitigated by covering yourself. How much you should cover is situational but wholly forgoing clothes when survival isn't effectively guaranteed isn't a smart move.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] echodot@feddit.uk 12 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Not only is it colder outside of Africa but it's colder everywhere, than it was when humans first evolved.

The claim swings from glacial, to interglacial, to temperate. Humans evolved in a temperate period, but since then we've had an Ice Age (It was kind of a big thing), and now we are in an interglacial period

[-] MajesticFlame@lemmy.one 28 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

By the way, the evolutionary reason is far more interesting. We need to wear clothes in cold weather because we don't have fur. Why did we evolve to not have fur? Because not having fur allows humans to sweat. Sweating is the most effective way to get rid of excess body heat, far better then panting that many mammals use. This allows humans to run without stopping for much longer than animals, allowing humans to hunt animals by chasing them until they tire out and stop.

Of course, other animals could not evolve sweating because they are unable to use clothes and fire to keep themselves warm without fur.

[-] BluesF@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago

Don't some animals sweat & have fur, though (horses for example)? Why did we need to lose our fur to sweat?

[-] __Lost__@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 8 months ago

Sweat on skin evaporates and cools you down. Sweat on hair just makes the hair wet.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Waraugh@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 8 months ago

The first humans were covered in fur. Once we created fire it was common to feel colder when away from the fire. This led to the creation of clothes. Once humans had created clothes to stay warm away from the fire they started shaving their bodies in order to display rock hard muscles to their mates in order to get laid. Over time only the strongest of hairs survived the constant shaving which is why we still have limited and varying degrees of body hair today. It used to be a very politically contentious subject on if it was moral to shave a baby or if you should wait until they were old enough to shave themselves. The down side to waiting for the pro shaving portion of the population was that the babies hair would thicken significantly as they aged if you waited. This would create a major disadvantage to them if they wanted to display as smooth chiseled tone as an adult. It is important to remember that back then adulthood was commonly accepted to start at the age of 12. The anti shaving populace quickly fell out of favor as a significant majority of humans would ultimately end up shaving regardless and it is undeniable that a major evolutionary advantage existed for those who were shaved as babies.

[-] DickFiasco@lemm.ee 3 points 8 months ago

This needs to become part of Wikipedia

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Prandom_returns@lemm.ee 25 points 8 months ago

I know a lot of Catholic people that don't believe in the bible shit. Which defeats the purpose of the religion if you ask me.

They still go to church and repeat all the shit they get told to repeat.

They believe there was Jesus and that there's a god. But that's about it. Weird to ne, but fine, whatever.

If you really believe in stuff like Adam and Eve, you really need professional help, as you are mentally unstable or just maleducated.

[-] cmbabul@lemmy.world 11 points 8 months ago

I would get it if they all just openly said they were in it because they want something to belong to or they enjoyed the community. But I grew up in that shit and know they all hate each other, or at least judge the fuck out of and talk tremendous shit about each other.

I’d love to have a place where I can go weekly and see the same folks and bond and fellowship(as the Christian’s say) with my neighbors. But I guess it’s hard to do that when there isn’t the threat of damnation for not attending

[-] ignism@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago

I’m lucky my DnD group doesn’t need the threat of damnation for not attending

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 8 points 8 months ago

Hey, if your religion has a bunch of stupid shit, but you practice it without believing the stupid shit...sounds like a win to me. Most of us would be better off if more Christians were like that.

[-] MonkderZweite@feddit.ch 5 points 8 months ago

Depends on what part you practice. If it's the wrong part, you get MAGA people.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Zagorath@aussie.zone 4 points 8 months ago

I know a lot of Catholic people that don't believe in the bible shit. Which defeats the purpose of the religion if you ask me.

Actually, this is the normal state of things. The old testament especially was originally written in a sort of literary mode. It's meant to be interpreted in a sort of metaphorical sense, not taken as a literal account of events. To quote from this video by someone with a background in religious studies:

The Bible is a collection of documents, written in many different literary genres, edited over a long period of time, whose main purpose is to make theological points, not to serve as a record of literal history.

This other video from the same creator, particularly the final section on "genre", is also good. It explains how the bible was written in a literary mode and not in the way that a historical document attempting to describe events literally would have been written.

The idea of interpreting the bible as telling literal events is a comparatively recent event. In ancient times, people probably would have been confused at the idea that some people today take it literally.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] pjwestin@lemmy.world 20 points 8 months ago

Did anyone else see Gen 3 and think, "Hoenn?"

[-] Cyyris@infosec.pub 10 points 8 months ago
[-] AVincentInSpace@pawb.social 5 points 8 months ago

Glad to know that Ruby/Sapphire is indeed canon to all later Pokémon games. I'd been worried about that.

[-] NegativeLookBehind@lemmy.world 17 points 8 months ago

Monkeys don’t wear pants. Boom. Checkmate, Darwin

[-] Worx@lemmynsfw.com 7 points 8 months ago

I think you'll find that monkeys and humans evolved from a common ancestor - an ape who wore sweatpants. Some of these apes evolved into suit-wearing bankers and some evolved into monkeys who gave up on clothes all together

[-] Plopp@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

The lesser known Hominidae Comfortablis.

[-] Ookami38@sh.itjust.works 3 points 8 months ago

Clearly our common ancestors had sweater material skin. We just evolved to take it off.

[-] hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 8 months ago

Lol it's a great morning to read this. Last night in a dream I was applying for a loan "as the nature intended"

[-] Hupf@feddit.de 8 points 8 months ago

There is nothing natural about loans though.

[-] Hadriscus@lemm.ee 5 points 8 months ago

Hahaha it's the grown up version of going to school naked

[-] hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 8 months ago

Lmao yeah I guess. Being in middle of car leasing and mortgage is stressful

[-] Hadriscus@lemm.ee 3 points 8 months ago

Best wishes

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 12 points 8 months ago

Omniscient Yaweh has a very poor understanding of cause and effect in Genesis.

It's not the Tree of Knowledge as many people think, it's the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil.

Meaning that yes, he told Adam and Eve not to eat that fruit, but he also didn't give them the capacity to learn right from wrong, so why would they do what he said?

[-] JustRobForNow@mastodon.social 4 points 8 months ago

@FlyingSquid @magnolia_mayhem
Turns out he was lying anyway & the 'deceptive' serpent was telling the truth.

[-] magnolia_mayhem@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

I love this detail. It's one of my favorite go-tos for the OT.

[-] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 8 months ago

One nation in the Pacific Rim (I forget which) was ashamed of their mostly naked primitive peoples. (Their men wore penis-horns.) So Levi-Strauss provided them with a bunch of modern clothes to wear, which they liked... for a while.

Neither Levi nor the government provided the trobe with modern laundering, and as a result, the whole tribe broke out in an epidemic of skin rashes. it was super unpleasant, and everyone learned the hard way going regimental is better than letting your underwear get too dirty. Without modern water and power it's good to get used to a brisk wind between your nethers.

All the Levi-Strauss clothes were mostly discarded. Some was turned into furniture or carrying sachels. The tribe still goes around with their penis horns and other bits flapping about.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 8 points 8 months ago

Plot so thick, you could stand on it!

[-] FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today 8 points 8 months ago

I feel like if a lot of animals had the intellectual capacity to make and wear clothes they absolutely would.

[-] Canis_76@feddit.nl 6 points 8 months ago

Probably because we get cold in some places. We can also make clothes. God forbid the clergy run up on some savages having a fantastic time of it.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 17 Mar 2024
276 points (97.3% liked)

Atheism

3984 readers
37 users here now

Community Guide


Archive Today will help you look at paywalled content the way search engines see it.


Statement of Purpose

Acceptable

Unacceptable

Depending on severity, you might be warned before adverse action is taken.

Inadvisable


Application of warnings or bans will be subject to moderator discretion. Feel free to appeal. If changes to the guidelines are necessary, they will be adjusted.


If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathizer or a resemblant of a group that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of any other group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you you will be banned on sight.

Provable means able to provide proof to the moderation, and, if necessary, to the community.

 ~ /c/nostupidquestions

If you want your space listed in this sidebar and it is especially relevant to the atheist or skeptic communities, PM DancingPickle and we'll have a look!


Connect with Atheists

Help and Support Links

Streaming Media

This is mostly YouTube at the moment. Podcasts and similar media - especially on federated platforms - may also feature here.

Orgs, Blogs, Zines

Mainstream

Bibliography

Start here...

...proceed here.

Proselytize Religion

From Reddit

As a community with an interest in providing the best resources to its members, the following wiki links are provided as historical reference until we can establish our own.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS