985
top 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] paysrenttobirds@sh.itjust.works 139 points 5 months ago

How many times did they remix that 42.5% before being like I'm just going to go be a clown?

[-] Chadus_Maximus@lemm.ee 76 points 5 months ago

There pretty much had to be a grad student getting absolutely grilled for crappy measurements when they showed the paper.

[-] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 83 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

"Here are my 6 measurements per datapiont, totalling 240, and here are the 137 measurements for that one spike there"

[-] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 15 points 5 months ago

That is nothing but nature trolling us

[-] Pulptastic@midwest.social 3 points 5 months ago

That's a phase diagram, there's probably lots of cool things going on in the solid state below that line. Probably different ratio solids at each peak. 1:4 3:2 etc. The % are goofy because it is reported by weight but behaves based on count.

[-] Chestnut@lemmy.world 106 points 5 months ago
[-] Rhaedas@fedia.io 75 points 5 months ago

My uneducated gut feeling is that it's due to the ratio of water and how the water molecules interact with the acid. Other acids have similar curves (in that they aren't a smooth curve).

[-] Firebirdie713@lemmy.blahaj.zone 89 points 5 months ago

This is correct, and it isn't just associated with acids. It's because of an effect called 'freezing point depression', which is the same reason salt lowers the freezing point of water while raising its boiling point.

There are a few explanations as to why this happens, with the easiest being this: if you add something that can't freeze to something that can, then the whole thing will need to lose more energy to allow the whole mass to solidify because the un-freezing stuff physically interferes with the attempts of the freezing stuff to bind together.

However, there is also the additional aspect of vapor pressure, which comes into play when adding things that can freeze to another thing that also freezes, but at a different temperature. I don't really understand that at all, so I will pull from the Wikipedia article on it:

The freezing point is the temperature at which the liquid solvent and solid solvent are at equilibrium, so that their vapor pressures are equal. When a non-volatile solute is added to a volatile liquid solvent, the solution vapour pressure will be lower than that of the pure solvent. As a result, the solid will reach equilibrium with the solution at a lower temperature than with the pure solvent. This explanation in terms of vapor pressure is equivalent to the argument based on chemical potential, since the chemical potential of a vapor is logarithmically related to pressure. All of the colligative properties result from a lowering of the chemical potential of the solvent in the presence of a solute. This lowering is an entropy effect. The greater randomness of the solution (as compared to the pure solvent) acts in opposition to freezing, so that a lower temperature must be reached, over a broader range, before equilibrium between the liquid solution and solid solution phases is achieved. Melting point determinations are commonly exploited in organic chemistry to aid in identifying substances and to ascertain their purity.

So, TL;DR is that chemistry is weird, things react weird at the molecular level because of energy states, and that is what allows us to make ice cream!

[-] Rhaedas@fedia.io 19 points 5 months ago

Thanks for the extra info. I figured it applied across many solutions. And your TLDR was my initial response - chemistry...well physics in general to cover everything else too, is weird.

[-] deo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 5 months ago

The particular acid (sulfuric acid) in the graph is especially complicated b/c it has three different protonation states that are favored at different pHs. Other acids (like nitric, for example) at least only have two protonation states to worry about...

[-] Carnelian@lemmy.world 14 points 5 months ago

molecules be getting freaky with it fr fr

[-] rockerface@lemm.ee 98 points 5 months ago

And that's at fixed pressure, otherwise the graph turns 3D and whoever has to format it starts looking longingly at the window

[-] Natanael@slrpnk.net 4 points 5 months ago

And then we have fluids with multiple substances and you might need higher dimensions

[-] Zerush@lemmy.ml 46 points 5 months ago

Better is Acetic acid

Water itself is also fine. In space what ocurres with water? Does it freeze or evaporate?

[-] rbesfe@lemmy.ca 16 points 5 months ago

The vacuum would cause it to evaporate, but since the higher energy molecules escape first it would freeze and then sublimate to nothing

[-] lengau@midwest.social 14 points 5 months ago

In space what ocurres with water? Does it freeze or evaporate?

[-] Pulptastic@midwest.social 8 points 5 months ago

Depends on temperature and pressure. This diagram doesn't go that low, but I would guess it's a solid in the near vacuum of space based on what I know of space ice like Saturns rings and comet tails.

[-] sonori@beehaw.org 2 points 5 months ago

Depends on how far out it is from the nearest star. Inside the orbit of jupiter exposed ice will sublimate into steam thanks to heating from sunlight, outside it remains ice. This is actually what a comet is, namely a ball of ice from the outer solar system orbiting in close to the sun and sublimating off. The steam is so loosely bound thanks to the tiny gravity of the comet that the solar wind blows it away, creating the visable tail.

[-] Zerush@lemmy.ml 2 points 5 months ago

Yes, Water itself has a pretty weird freezing diagram, but meltin diagrams are already weird, even in metals as I remeber this from Iron, iron carbid. Melting always depends on several factors, pressure, depending of added substances...

[-] can@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 months ago

That's just the tip an apple. Don't you dare try to tell me otherwise.

[-] jennwiththesea@lemmy.world 28 points 5 months ago

Imagine this, but with a sample set that can't be easily replicated and no one believes that you didn't doctor them somehow. Not fun.

[-] Chadus_Maximus@lemm.ee 10 points 5 months ago

Is this what the audiophiles call "w shaped?"

[-] TheOakTree@lemm.ee 6 points 5 months ago

This is what audiophiles call "wtf is this FR curve."

[-] mitchty@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 5 months ago

Does the fr curve just reply back with: bonjour?

[-] TheOakTree@lemm.ee 1 points 5 months ago

No, it replies with tinnitus-inducing screeches :)

[-] Pulptastic@midwest.social 10 points 5 months ago

That's a phase diagram, there's probably lots of cool things going on in the solid state below that line. Probably different ratio solids at each peak. 1:4 3:2 etc. The % are goofy because it is reported by weight but behaves based on count.

[-] can@sh.itjust.works 7 points 5 months ago

Is there any way for me to easily download this waveform?

[-] satanmat@lemmy.world 15 points 5 months ago

I think it’s the bass line from that one Daft Punk song…

[-] abruptly8951@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

This sounds like a fun project "samples of chemistry"

[-] can@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I'd love to throw it in a wavetable synth*

[-] ByteJunk@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

I would only trust the 0%...

this post was submitted on 03 Apr 2024
985 points (99.7% liked)

Science Memes

10348 readers
1465 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.


Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS