473
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Minotaur@lemm.ee 94 points 7 months ago

I’m guessing she just sold a bunch of Lockheed Martin stock

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 20 points 7 months ago

Hmmhmmm. Shorted that shit.

[-] return2ozma@lemmy.world 59 points 7 months ago

AIPAC is losing its grip over the Democratic party.

[-] Deceptichum@sh.itjust.works 22 points 7 months ago

That’s only true if there is any consequences. So far nothing has actually come about.

[-] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 19 points 7 months ago

He means it used to be pure political suicide for anyone in congress to say a word about not funding and defending Israel no matter what war criminal shit they got up to, and now we have a Palestinian congresswoman who says stuff like “from the river to the sea” and no AIPAC-funded candidate has primaried her yet.

I’ll fully agree with you that it remains to be seen how much of that will turn into anything substantive the US decides to do to stop the killing, but the political landscape is definitely way way different than it used to be.

[-] Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone 50 points 7 months ago

Call your reps and get them to join into to the demand

40 reps is not enough to make it happen

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 11 points 7 months ago

Particularly when they signed the funding bill,

[-] Uranium3006@kbin.social 47 points 7 months ago

Israel might have gone one step to far with the world central kitchen killings

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 24 points 7 months ago

We'll see if Biden actually cuts off weapons sales.

[-] khannie@lemmy.world 9 points 7 months ago

Narrator: He did not

[-] Pips@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 7 months ago

José Andrés is one of the most loved people in DC regardless of politics. Fucking with his people is very bad, to put it mildly.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 46 points 7 months ago

We'll that's interesting. She's as mainstream as Democrats come. I was wondering a few days ago if Israel had had it's Walter Cronkite moment with this strike. I guess I'll be cautiously optimistic for a few days.

[-] khannie@lemmy.world 12 points 7 months ago

Walter Cronkite moment

Could you explain that to me?

[-] FinalRemix@lemmy.world 25 points 7 months ago

https://mwi.westpoint.edu/war-public-opinion-myth-cronkite-moment/

Vietnam war, and Cronkite gave an editorial report that, ostensibly, shifted everyone's opinion on said war.

[-] khannie@lemmy.world 9 points 7 months ago

Many thanks!

[-] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world 27 points 7 months ago

Did not expect this woman to be in the first 40. She was all in on calling Palestine protestors Chinese and Russian plants.

[-] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 24 points 7 months ago

Pelosi is also a reasonably savvy politician. Even if you look at her as a soulless political monster, she probably sees that American support of Israel has been steadily falling and the Israeli attack on aid workers may be the last straw for a lot of Americans. Therefore, it is imperitive to lay down political cover for Biden to halt military aid transfers to Israel.

[-] GladiusB@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

Oh she listens to the citizens about things?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] njm1314@lemmy.world 26 points 7 months ago

Are not all these weapon transfers laws that have already been voted on months and even years ago sometimes? Didn't she probably vote for some of these?

[-] perviouslyiner@lemmy.world 33 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

The laws include stopping transfers to anyone who the president determines to be interfering with [US] humanitarian aid.

[-] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 8 points 7 months ago

Not quite that simple - authorization was voted on long ago in some cases but it’s up to the executive branch how and when to actually send them. They’re usually approved in big blocks which go out over time on no required-by-law schedule.

I think she probably voted for them back when being for Israel was a way to get votes, and now being for Israel is a way to lose votes, and now she’s alarmed and deeply concerned about the plight of the Palestinian people, all of a sudden. Whatever. If it leads to less support for Israel I’m at least happy that her insider trading ass is on the right side even if only very slightly and only by accident.

I also 100% agree with whoever it was that said call your representatives and encourage them to get on board too.

[-] eskimofry@lemm.ee 26 points 7 months ago

Lol these people were sleeping till now because it was just a bunch of brown people getting murdered en-mass. The moment some white folk died they care.

[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 20 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Not just sleeping.

Pelosi herself accused protesters advocating for this exact thing of being "paid by Putin" back when it was "just" tens of thousands of Palestinian civilians and hundreds of Israel-critical journalists being murdered by the fascist apartheid regime..

[-] wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works 15 points 7 months ago
[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

This is my favorite iteration of this meme ever 😄✊️

[-] FinalRemix@lemmy.world 11 points 7 months ago

Something must have affected her portfolio...

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

True, however, when you're asking for political change you don't refuse the help of politicians switching sides. Especially senior ones, because they may be doing a trial balloon. And if the public refuses them they won't see an upside to continuing that change. Instead they will retreat and focus on their base. So on the off chance this is a real attempt to shift policy we should be nicer to her for a minute. Show the mainstream democrats that we're willing to vote for them if they meet us.

[-] Phegan@lemmy.world 24 points 7 months ago

Nance is in the right for once. Rare W for Nance.

[-] steve_floof@lemm.ee 18 points 7 months ago

After being called out on profiting off this genocide, she heroically attempted to repair optics around her

[-] Pappabosley@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago

Exactly, she's probably made a huge profit selling her defence contractor shares and now she wants Biden to stop, so the price tanks and she can buy them back again cheap, to sell at the next war

[-] go_go_gadget@lemmy.world 13 points 7 months ago

Don't be fooled by her. She's a shark and she smells blood in the water.

[-] tocopherol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Almost, unfortunately:

halt the the transfer of weapons to Israel until a full investigation into the airstrike was completed.

They aren't concerned with the thousands of children in the rubble, just the few white people that were killed.

[-] Nobody@lemmy.world 23 points 7 months ago

I’ll wait and see if anything actually happens. When Bibi calls their bluff yet again by continuing the genocide with added aid worker deaths and embassy bombings, will he face any actual consequences?

I’m guessing no. This is all theater. The status quo will be maintained at all costs.

[-] TheBananaKing@lemmy.world 8 points 7 months ago

Halt transfers until the investigation is completed.

Israel's own investigation, that is.

And starting back up again doesn't even depend on the outcome.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 12 points 7 months ago

On Reuters they're reporting the representatives also want an American investigation.

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 22 points 7 months ago

Fuck Israel.

[-] HawlSera@lemm.ee 21 points 7 months ago

This one of those "I'm going against it solely because I know opposing it at this point won't do anything."

[-] TIMMAY@lemmy.world 17 points 7 months ago

probably cuts in to her profit margins on the market somehow

[-] autotldr 4 points 7 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Following the killing of seven World Central Kitchen workers by an Israeli strike while delivering food to Gaza earlier this week, House Democrats wrote a letter on Friday to U.S. President Joe Biden and Secretary of State Antony Blinken urging them to halt the the transfer of weapons to Israel until a full investigation into the airstrike was completed.

The letter, spearheaded by Reps. Mark Pocan, Jim McGovern and Jan Schakowsky, was signed by 40 lawmakers including Nancy Pelosi and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.

“If this strike is found to have violated U.S. or international law, we urge you to continue withholding these transfers until those responsible are held accountable.

In a statement to Rolling Stone, a spokesperson for Pelosi said she is “sympathetic to some of the thoughts in the letter, and she feels very strongly that there must be a comprehensive, independent investigation into the horrific killing of the World Central Kitchen heroes,” adding, “Speaker Pelosi knows President Biden’s support for Israel and empathy with the innocent civilians in Gaza, and she respects his judgment in how to proceed.”

The letter also addressed reports that an estimated 32,000 people have been killed in Gaza since October 7, and that the Integrated Food Security Phase Classification initiative (IPC) recently warned that widespread famine is imminent and “expected to occur anytime between now and the next month if there is not an immediate cessation of hostilities.”

We again strongly urge you to withhold any offensive weapons transfers until the investigation into the airstrike is concluded and, if it is found this strike violated U.S. or international law, those responsible are held accountable,” the lawmakers emphasized.


The original article contains 503 words, the summary contains 270 words. Saved 46%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 06 Apr 2024
473 points (97.2% liked)

politics

19096 readers
3222 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS