444

Russia has 'right to war' with 'each and every' NATO country - Medvedev (www.euronews.com)

submitted 1 year ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world

162 comments fedilink hide all child comments

“Whether you like it, or not, history is on our side. We will bury you,” he said quoting former USSR leader Nikita Khrushchev.

Russian politician Dmitry Medvedev said on Tuesday Russia could have a right to go to war with NATO.

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 138 points 1 year ago

I wonder… does medvedev have enough wits left to understand that if Russia has that right… then everyone … has that right?

They’re finding Ukraine difficult enough. Sure we’re sharing some toys (a lot of toys)… but they don’t have carriers or attack subs or missile destroyers…

Threatening nato is not a sane decision to make. We might just take them at their word.

[-] SupraMario@lemmy.world 87 points 1 year ago

The toys we're sharing are our older toys from the 80s and 90s even. Its not even the more deadly stuff we have...and they're fighting against a force that's getting a few weeks training on these toys and sent out into the field. If russia truly wants a 72 hour war...all it would need to do is attack NATO.

[-] Ertebolle@kbin.social 30 points 1 year ago

Yeah, Ukraine is excited about maybe getting some F-16s and how much that could help with the air war and meanwhile a couple of F-22s could take down a whole squadron of them.

load more comments (7 replies)

[-] Candelestine@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

72? Pretty generous. I'm pretty sure we have more HARM missiles than they do S400 SAM batteries.

load more comments (10 replies)

load more comments (1 replies)

[-] wintermute_oregon@lemm.ee 18 points 1 year ago

America is not giving Ukraine the most advanced weapons and that is stopping Russia.

Imagine if America used their pre advanced weapons.

It’s posturing. Russia wants to look tough. They’re a paper tiger.

load more comments (5 replies)

load more comments (1 replies)

[-] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 82 points 1 year ago

Good news then: If you go to war with one NATO member you get war with the rest of them absolutely free!

[-] BetaBlake@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

For 4 Easy payments of 19.95 you too can get your shit pushed in by 31 different countries, with the added bonus of having someone else raise your children.

load more comments (2 replies)

[-] Gingerlegs@lemmy.world 63 points 1 year ago

Can’t even take on Ukraine, you want to come at every other western country? Lol

[-] Dkarma@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago

Russia is the irritating kid down the street who just broke his nerf gun so he's threatening to throw the darts at you instead and tell his mom you're not invited to his birthday party...

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 53 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Whether you like it, or not, history is on our side. We will bury you

Because we all know the Soviet Union and Russia are exactly the same thing and the Russian military is definitely as powerful and as capable as the Soviet Union, no doubt. Please pay no attention to the complete lack of victory in Ukraine.

[-] Earthwormjim91@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

When has either the Soviet Union or Russia “won” anything in the last 150 years?

Their “win” in WWII was throwing as many bodies as possible and starving their own cities to delay the Germans long enough for winter to set in.

Soviet casualties were 4.5x higher than Axis casualties in operation Barbarossa. They lost 21k aircraft to 2800 for the Germans. 20k tanks destroyed vs 2700 for the Germans. And 4.5 million casualties compared to 1 million for the Germans.

I wouldn’t call that “burying” anyone. The biggest effect it had was weakening the Germans enough for the Allies to finish the job on the Western Front and bail the Soviets out.

The Soviets lost in Afghanistan in the 80s because of the US funding the Mujahideen.

Their biggest victory in the last century was taking Crimea because nobody else stepped up to help Ukraine like we are now.

Russia has nukes. That’s it. Beyond that they’re worthless militarily.

load more comments (25 replies)

[-] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 49 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Maxim Katz has explained that these kinds of deranged declarations are not directed at us. They are a kind of symbolic self-humiliation of Medvedev to prove to Putin that he is still loyal. It's "look I am willing to appear so wretched and ridiculous to the foreigners, I could not possibly be a threat to you, I am not some kind of alternative that could replace you, I am such a silly man, please don't throw me out of a window".

[-] Epilektoi_Hoplitai@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 year ago

Speculation runs that Dimi has been told by the Tsar that if he acts like the tough guy he isn't with enough bravado, he'll be allowed to sit in the big boys' chair and pretend to be president again.

[-] carlosfm@lemm.ee 42 points 1 year ago

The second greatest army in Ukraine wants to mess with Nato? LOL

[-] Chariotwheel@kbin.social 36 points 1 year ago

So has Denmark.

Though it would be funny ig Russia didn't. Imagine Putin declaring war on Poland and Poland just saying "no, it's against the law."

load more comments (4 replies)

[-] blue_zephyr@lemmy.world 36 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

War has fuck-all to do with rights. If you're going to attack a NATO country we will beat your ass back into the stone age without mercy, your nukes won't save you if you dare cross that line.

[-] Red_October@lemmy.world 34 points 1 year ago

I mean... he's not wrong? They could have a war with NATO any time they wanted it. Russia could have war with NATO whenever they want it. They've been very careful to not actually DO that, of course. Last thing they need is to start losing another one with someone who won't have any difficulty in bringing the full conflict right to them.

[-] LeftSaidFred@lemmynsfw.com 20 points 1 year ago

It's a very "hold me back, bros" sentiment. Only his bro, singular, is Belarus.

[-] squidman@lemmy.world 34 points 1 year ago

But do they have the ability to war? 🤔

[-] HamSwagwich@showeq.com 29 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

They can't even fight a small country like Ukraine and they want to test the might of a fully armed and optional ~~Battlestaion~~ NATO alliance? Do they believe that anyone really believes them?

load more comments (7 replies)

[-] HawlSera@lemm.ee 29 points 1 year ago

A right to war? Are you fucking high?

[-] Pringles@lemm.ee 28 points 1 year ago

Nobody is stopping them from exercising that right against any NATO country. What about Poland? They have been a historical nuisance, Dimi. Just shoot a rocket at a farm somewhere, but make it intentional this time.

[-] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago

These dumbfucks can’t manage a war with Ukraine. To state the obvious.

load more comments (3 replies)

[-] straycat@lemmy.blahaj.zone 26 points 1 year ago

History's on their side? Boy do I have news for him...

load more comments (3 replies)

[-] Pons_Aelius@kbin.social 25 points 1 year ago

A house cat has the right to attack a lion as well...

load more comments (1 replies)

[-] IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago

“Are you gonna bark all day, little doggy, or are you gonna bite?” - Mr. Blonde.

load more comments (2 replies)

[-] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago

And everyone has the right to shoot back. Not sure why such a declaration comes across as so one sided.

[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 21 points 1 year ago

Mate, you can't even win against a non-NATO country, that happens to be the poorest in Europe.

But sure, you have the right to have a war with everyone. Even if we all know you can't.

[-] Badass_panda@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago

I mean... I can't see any issue with NATO not stopping Ukraine from invading its own territory... the territory the UN recognizes as part of Ukraine... and which Russia signed three separate treaties promising to respect as part of Ukraine.

load more comments (2 replies)

[-] pozbo@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago

Oh no, we're all gonna be totally dead in 3 days. Remember how they took Kiev in 3 days? Flawlessly.

[-] ALERT@sh.itjust.works 20 points 1 year ago

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KyivNotKiev

load more comments (3 replies)

[-] WiildFiire@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

How are they gonna have time to bury anybody when they're busy burying hundreds of thousands of citizens they force to go to war for them?

[-] InvertedParallax@lemm.ee 18 points 1 year ago

... I mean, ok?

Come get some.

[-] Llewellyn@lemm.ee 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Oh don't bother. Medvedev is a joke. Always has been. I tell you this as a Russian.

load more comments (1 replies)

[-] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 17 points 1 year ago

Krushchev is an interesting person to quote here. Wasn't he stripped of power by an empire that would utterly collapse within 20 years of his death?

[-] Widowmaker_Best_Girl@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

Okay...? Why would you want to though? Just want to kill a lot of people for no other reason than, "but I have the right to!"

[-] BeautifulMind@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

Well, yeah. Everyone has the right to make bad decisions

[-] umbraroze@kbin.social 16 points 1 year ago

Freedom of ~~Speech~~ War doesn't mean Freedom from Consequences!

load more comments (5 replies)

[-] TheGreenGolem@lemm.ee 15 points 1 year ago

Sure. And the mouse has the right to war with the elephant. But it's not a very clever thing to do.

[-] onionbaggage@lemmynsfw.com 13 points 1 year ago

Feel free to exercise that right at your convenience

[-] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

Going to war isn't about rights. Rights are a soft power thing while war is purely about hard power. What is he even trying to say here? Like if there was a right and lack of a right to war, what would they look like? What would the functional difference between the two be?

load more comments (1 replies)

[-] GreenMario@lemm.ee 12 points 1 year ago

Ha! Your mouth is writing checks your ass can't cash.

I wish a motherfucker would tho.

load more comments

this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2023

444 points (96.8% liked)

World News

38969 readers

2430 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.