405

alt text: A screenshot of a comment thread by two people. OP comment says "What's the difference between git and GitHub" and the replying comment says "like the difference between porn and pornhub"

top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] WalrusDragonOnABike@reddthat.com 78 points 7 months ago

Github is blocked in Texas?

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 40 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

More like Github blocked Texas rather than complying with invasive state legislation.

I support PornHub in standing up to privacy invasion. Let us wank or flick in peace.

[-] WraithGear@lemmy.world 34 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

So these states that are imposing these measures and forcing porn sites like pornhub to pull out, are doing it “for the children”

But the only porn sites that comply are the ones who are trying to legitimize themselves to protect people. Like porn hub lost over 1/3 of their catalogue over the verification of the actors in their content. To remove revenge porn and other abuse.

That forces everyone to use the porn sites that do not care about exploitation nor the rules of these states. Pushing people tword crime like prohibition.

And still nothing stops children from binging porn

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago

It has nothing to do with underage content. That’s against federal law. Do you have a source regarding PornHub’s lost content due to Texas legislation?

The Texas law requires users to provide state-issued identification to access adult content. That requires adult websites to verify and retain user identity. PornHub responded to this legislation by blocking access from Texas, rather than complying with privacy-invading legislation.

[-] WraithGear@lemmy.world 19 points 7 months ago

You misunderstand, the loss in content was a prior thing. It may have a different thing pushing that. My point being that porn hub is able to be accountable, or at least held accountable for their content. And they are pushed out of the market in these states, which leaves only the bad actors to make profit of the vacuum

Teenagers still have unfettered access to porn, they have just been restricted from better curated and less exploitive porn.

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 10 points 7 months ago

Gotcha. I was surprised to read that, since the Texas legislature was restricting access not content. It’s definitely already a federal crime.

Let’s be honest, that law restricted older Texans the most. Teenagers know how to use VPNs. Lol

[-] AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net 5 points 7 months ago

I hadn't thought about it this way. Even more reason to hate this stupid, hateful, legislation.

[-] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone 38 points 7 months ago

"Software is like sex: it's better when it's free." -Linus Torvalds

[-] joyjoy@lemm.ee 16 points 7 months ago

While porn may be open source, PornHub is not.

[-] AVincentInSpace@pawb.social 7 points 7 months ago

Much like Git and GitHub in that regard.

(GitLab ftw.)

[-] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Codeberg ft[real]w. FOSS based nonprofit.

[-] morrowind@lemmy.ml 15 points 7 months ago

Not the exact same thing, github doesn't contain git like ph does

[-] RmDebArc_5@sh.itjust.works 60 points 7 months ago
[-] wander1236@sh.itjust.works 31 points 7 months ago
[-] morrowind@lemmy.ml 7 points 7 months ago

:(((

Git Source Code Mirror - This is a publish-only repository

(⓿_⓿)

[-] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 2 points 7 months ago

Yup, have to contribute via patches in email. That was a fun experience.

[-] janet_catcus@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 7 months ago

i have an obligation to say this: i prefer fossil

[-] zagaberoo@beehaw.org 4 points 7 months ago

I adore Fossil as well. Having simple tools like a wiki and tickets built into each repo is rad.

[-] AVincentInSpace@pawb.social 4 points 7 months ago

I love the idea of Fossil -- tools like a wiki, issue tracker, automatic synchronization, all built in, plus the more resilient on-disk format, are features Git should've had from the get-go (no pun intended), and having everything, web server to CLI wrapped up in a single binary is an extremely cool way to do it.

I want to switch to it, I really do, but git commit --amend is just not something that I am prepared to live without

[-] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 4 points 7 months ago

I actually used Mercurial for many years until Git became ubiquitious.

[-] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 8 points 7 months ago

"Git Gone Wild"

[-] krakenfury@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 7 months ago

I have a pull request wanna merge?

this post was submitted on 17 Apr 2024
405 points (100.0% liked)

196

16501 readers
2037 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS