105
submitted 6 months ago by MisterMoo@mastodon.online to c/firefox@lemmy.ml

Dear @firefox : Please stop saving images as webp when I drag them out of the browser. Forever stop that. Even if they are webp originally, just give me a setting to auto-convert them to JPEG. When I get a webp file the first thing I have to do is convert it manually if I'm going to do *anything* with it.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] taladar@sh.itjust.works 121 points 6 months ago

Implicitly converting anything anywhere is always a bad idea, especially when it can't be done in a lossless way.

[-] cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 15 points 6 months ago

There could be an option to auto convert to PNG. I wouldn't want anything auto converted to a lossy format like JPEG.

[-] boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net 8 points 6 months ago

Lossless webp to lossless JXL

[-] eya@lemmy.dbzer0.com 53 points 6 months ago
[-] can@sh.itjust.works 20 points 6 months ago

Did they intend to tag an official Firefox account or something? I'm not sure how this works on the Mastadon side of things.

[-] Atemu@lemmy.ml 16 points 6 months ago

Mastodon's UI for groups is terrible. This community is indistinguishable from an account named "@Firefox" with thousands of followers unless you open its page and notice it says "Group" and understand what that means.

[-] eya@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 6 months ago
[-] Frederic@beehaw.org 52 points 6 months ago

When I save an image, I want the exact same binary 1:1, not a recompressed one or whatever, I want the original picture, be it jpeg/png/webp, every graphics program can open webp, nothing wrong with it.

At least if you hate webp, convert them to png, but not jpeg...

[-] tetris11@lemmy.ml 51 points 6 months ago

webp is a great format though...

[-] nokturne213@sopuli.xyz 33 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Too bad so many platforms are not compatible with it. I am constantly having to convert the image type to post the image.

[-] umbrella@lemmy.ml 18 points 6 months ago

thats on the platforms not the format

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] kevincox@lemmy.ml 10 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Not really. It is better than shitty JPEG encoders but not really much better than good ones. It's lossless was fairly good but still barely worth it. Really we should chuck it for JPEG XL but Google is strong-arming it for unknown reasons.

[-] tetris11@lemmy.ml 21 points 6 months ago

jpegxl should be the successor, granted - but that doesn't make webp any less good

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

Google is strong-arming it for unknown reasons.

lol. Yeah it’s a mystery.

[-] Amaltheamannen@lemmy.ml 10 points 6 months ago

Exactly, great quality and small file sizes. Perfect to reduce web bloat, or loading times when using things like FoundryVTT

[-] 7eter@feddit.de 50 points 6 months ago

Okay all the hate about webp or jpg aside: This should at most be an add-on not a core FF feature. And it also is: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/save-webp-as-png-or-jpeg/

[-] whereisk@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago

Sounds more like a problem with their intended usage pipeline, like an image viewer or word processing app problem.

[-] gianni@lemmy.ml 36 points 6 months ago

WebP images are not bad. Not great, but not bad. The lossless mode is quite good. It is on the software you use to support WebP.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] breakingcups@lemmy.world 35 points 6 months ago

It's not really Firefox's task or problem to convert files from one format to the other, why would it be?

[-] Couldbealeotard@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago

Why is it that the url ends in .JPG but when I right click and save image I can only save it as a .webp?

[-] IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world 24 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Some CDNs like Akamai and Cloudflare have options to optimize images. We use the Akamai one where I work. It means our creative teams, customers, etc. don’t need to worry too much about whether an image is properly optimized when they upload it. Akamai will, behind the scenes optimize the quality, color palette, and image type (jpg, web, png, etc) and create a number of different versions of the images. Then when a client requests the image Akamai looks at the client device (mobile vs desktop, screen resolution, browser version, etc) and serves the copy of the image that’s best optimized for that device.

So even if the URL ends with .jpg you might be sent a .webp. If you use the browsers developer tool to inspect the response headers you’ll likely see the Content-Type header says it’s .webp as well.

[-] dev_null@lemmy.ml 5 points 6 months ago

Because the URL is lying, and the image is not a jpg.

[-] boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net 25 points 6 months ago

There is an addon to request jpeg. But converting lossy...why?

[-] arin@lemmy.world 25 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Shouldn't we strive for webp compatibility in more applications so it can be viewed readily and easily?

[-] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 5 points 6 months ago

Sure. And then use formats that are good enough that have broad support.

Attack the problem from both sides.

[-] boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net 4 points 6 months ago

I mean Gwenview, GIMP and tons of other apps support it. I dont know an app that doesnt support it actually

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 23 points 6 months ago

What are you using that can't handle webp by now?

[-] veroxii@aussie.zone 8 points 6 months ago

Facebook Messenger on android. I hate messenger but that's where my Luddite family hangs out. Often have to convert the webp meme I downloaded from lemmy first.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] dessalines@lemmy.ml 17 points 6 months ago

jxl can't come fast enough.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] WolfLink@lemmy.ml 15 points 6 months ago

This post is why we can’t have nice things

[-] cerement@slrpnk.net 14 points 6 months ago

I might have to try that. I've been using Save webP as, though I'm not sure it's exactly what OP is asking. I like that it also does animated webp conversion.

[-] cerement@slrpnk.net 5 points 6 months ago

(same developer for both addons)

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Zodarr@lemmy.ml 10 points 6 months ago

I prefer PNG because of losless-nes (is that right?). If it's jpeg, or webp originally, i don't mind getting the image in that format. But converting/recompression is bad.

[-] TonyTonyChopper@mander.xyz 6 points 6 months ago

It should be spelt "losslessness". "lossless" is an adjective and when you add "-ness" to an adjective it becomes a noun.

I prefer PNG because it losslessly compresses raster images.

I prefer PNG because it uses a lossless algorithm.

I prefer PNG because I love losslessness.

[-] Affidavit@aussie.zone 9 points 6 months ago

After turning the word into a noun though, you'll need to know how to turn it back into an adjective. We use "-less" to turn the noun into an adjective.

I prefer PNG because it losslessnesslessly compresses raster images.

I prefer PNG because it uses a losslessnessless algorithm.

I prefer PNG because I love losslessnesslessness.

[-] darkphotonstudio@beehaw.org 10 points 6 months ago

Webpee is more Google shit being forced down our throats. They absolutely will eventually phase out all other graphic formats on Chrome. These giant tech companies are breaking the Web and this is just another example of them throwing their weight around.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] kuneho@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

fortunately, since you use Firefox, there are a handful of extensions available just for this problem already. Maybe not for the drag n drop, though...

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Heavybell@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

If you hate webp because you can't easily view it, let me recommend ImageGlass as a replacement image viewer for Windows (maybe Linux too, I forget).

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 26 Apr 2024
105 points (66.9% liked)

Firefox

17303 readers
45 users here now

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS