283
top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] billiam0202@lemmy.world 33 points 6 months ago

Given that Trump only cares about himself, when he says crime is "out of control" we should understand that to mean his crimes are out of control.

[-] Nougat@fedia.io 23 points 6 months ago

When Trump says words, your interpretation should be “How do those words help Donald J. Trump?”

You know how his long time assistant characterized him as having empathy because he would tell her to “Go home and spend time with your family”? It’s a sure bet that it has nothing to do with empathy, and that he was trying to get her out of the office so she wouldn’t witness the criming he was going to do or the controversial visitor he wanted to host.

[-] DerArzt@lemmy.world 20 points 6 months ago

You think he would do that, go out in the world and lie /s

[-] samus12345@lemmy.world 17 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

He has a point - he alone has contributed quite a few crimes, and continues to do so.

[-] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago

Just look at the people he surrounds himself with. It's a supernova of crime.

[-] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 8 points 6 months ago

Well people who believe one aren’t going to believe the other

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

It helps if you conflate police crackdowns on campus protests and state persecution of transgender residents as signs of "rising crime". I'm sure by November we'll get another "Migrant Caravan!!!!" crisis on the border. That will signal yet another Crime Wave of black-market farm laborers looking to escape the narco-gangs shipping us more nose candy to arms dealers on the Texas border.

(editors note: remember kids, drug buying BAD but guns sales GOOD)

[-] usualsuspect191@lemmy.ca 4 points 6 months ago

That's because he knows how much he's committing isn't being accounted for

[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

Well, we all know that his links to reality are ... a bit weak.

[-] Son_of_dad@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

Republicans have been saying the opposite on reality forever

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

Not just a "Republicans" problem. NYC Mayor Eric Adams and Chicago ex-Mayor Lori Lightfoot and Houston Mayor John Whitmire are also in on the "Ahh! Crime Wave!" racket.

Sinclair Media and Clear Channel Communications have made a deluge of "minorities doing crimes" stories central to their homogenization of local media coverage. Cable news channels (FOX most notably, but CNN and MSNBC aren't afraid to pile on) love the Missing White Girl saga. My hometown paper Houston Chronicle and local news channels love to talk about sex workers in the most lurid style and to cover human trafficking as an endless spectacle.

Its everywhere. It's suffocating.

[-] whotookkarl@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

New loyalty test dropping soon, 2+2=5

[-] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

He's projecting. Who would have guessed?

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 6 months ago

Spoke with my mother over the weekend. Told her how my partner got purse-snatched last week. She talked about rising crime. I just stayed quiet and didn't engage, let the topic change. She's a Trump voter, but she doesn't get it from him. She gets it from Fox News.

[-] reddwarf@feddit.nl 5 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Why did you not engage her? It is this sort of silence that empowers her and other like her. I get it, this is your mother but at the same time you are allowed to voice the truth and push back a little. Not to the level of an all out 'war' of course, I get that, but some push back is allowed. If that doesn't land well, there's not a whole lot you can do but if I were you I would drop nuggets of info every single time, just to not let it pass and give the impression they are right. It needs to be uncomfortable to air these lies.

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 6 months ago

Engagement nearly led to the end of our relationship in 2020. I countered her shit statistic of cop-related deaths (something like less than 100 in a year) easily with a Google search. She said she would choose to believe the number she read. I just about told her we would never speak again after months of moments like that. Only by blocking all politics could we remain family.

[-] reddwarf@feddit.nl 1 points 6 months ago

I get it and I expected as much. I would not engage to heavy either tbh, I totally get your problem and dilemma. Just a simple, 'that is not true' or 'you have been lied to' and then move on. She gets to drop nuggets of indisputable nonsense, you get to drop yours. Anyway, good luck!

[-] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world -5 points 6 months ago

Yeah no shit, because we’re living in fucking 1984.

this post was submitted on 30 Apr 2024
283 points (96.7% liked)

politics

19103 readers
3450 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS