It'd be neat if religion was for kids and adults were just in on it.

The least he could do is clean after himself.

I wonder if solar eclipses have that effect.

What if people just say they believe more to be more likely to collect aid.

Not to be confused with a miso-theist, who believes god exists as a form of soup.

That's just a denomination of pastafarianism

Which one's a mesothelioma

Yes it is fully possible to be an antitheistic agnostic atheist.

Perhaps my understanding of the term "antitheism" is incorrect. Though I checked Wikipedia before making my comment. Wikipedia's first paragraph says:

Antitheism [...] is the philosophical position that theism should be opposed. The term has had a range of applications. In secular contexts, it typically refers to direct opposition to the belief in any deity.

Given the latter definition, I think I used it appropriately. Though it's apparently a spectrum, similar to atheism/agnosticism.

I stand by my assertion that the term "atheist" doesn't need the "agnostic" qualifier to specify that a given person isn't asserting that there is no god. In my experience, people incorrectly assume all atheists are de-facto antitheists and believe, actively, that there is no god, which just isn't the case. But the additional clarification by adding "agnostic" is certainly helpful in terms of clarity; I can't argue against that.

Upon further reflection, I have known people who were both religious and agnostic at the same time; people who had belief/faith but admitted they couldn't possibly know the truth. I guess that does make a good argument for the additional qualification of 'agnostic atheist'. I guess I just too regularly encounter people who assume that all atheists actively believe there is no god, so I've become a bit defensive as to what the word actually means. I have acquaintances who are atheists who say "there's no god" with absolute metaphysical certainty, and erroneously consider me a like-minded person, which I have always found odd because atheism doesn't require an active belief in the absence of any higher power.

Agnostic is the opposite of gnostic. The terms have to do with whether you see evidence for the position or not.

Which is all not to be confused with capital-G Gnostic, which is a totally different thing. Unfortunately, the history of philosophy is messy that way.