-3
Voters don't like Biden's economy — but why?
(abcnews.go.com)
This is funny and would in another context be spot on, but IMO it's more about Republican policy than Democrat/Biden. Ironically the MAGA crowd has a base in occupy Wall Street, which was hijacked by propagandists for the 1%. And of course Trump gave massive tax cuts to the 1% and not everybody else.
The majority of the MAGA crowd is hurting themselves by voting Republican.
The “economy” they keep touting doesn’t really affect the average American. We’re broke because of how well the “economy” is doing for the capitalist class. I’m pretty disgusted with America. I don’t want trump to win which is the only reason I’ll vote for Biden.
Thy economy is roaring because stocks are at all time highs, corporate profitability is higher than ever, and productivity is off the charts! We've never had it so good!
Normal folks: "Sure, but I don't own stock or a business, AI threatens my job sometime in the future, and I can barely afford to make ends meet less than ever before. So....yay?"
Normal people don't own stock? What are they saving for retirement in then?
PERHAPS BECAUSE ""THE ECONOMY""" DOESN'T REPRESENT THE COST OF THINGS ANYMORE
Because people can't afford food and shelter. You know, little details like being able to live.
40 years of playing catch the trickle down.
Absolutely, but then why do the majority now consider Trump's presidency a success? When he gave massive tax cuts to the 1%, while increasing deficits at a period where those tax cuts should have been used to stabilize budgets?
That's a very clear example of Republican policy of supporting the rich at the cost of everybody else.
Biden is 100% the lesser evil in that regard, and he is actually working on reversing that trend. Are Americans really that dense?
Are Americans really that dense?
gestures at OP
Yes of course it's wrong to generalize, but it really is unfortunate to average Americans that so may vote Republican, when it so obviously is against their own interests.
I love how out of touch the media is these days. Saying we can't explain why...uhh yea...yea we can. You just don't listen to anyone but your handlers.
This article, for once, actually listens to real people and understands the problem:
Therein lies a disconnect between most economic indicators that economists consider — things like GDP, the unemployment rate, job growth and inflation — which are all looking up, and how voters feel. When voters measure economic well-being, they're much more likely to use more personal metrics, such as how easily their family can meet their basic needs.
That's interesting, as the title and then the first few sentences say they can't explain why people are mad at the economy.
People are freaking out, getting dinner for mom, dad, and 2 kids from freaking McDonalds and having it be $30. For MCDONALDS.
No, that's not an overstatement. $50 if you do Grubhub.
Mcdonald's has been systematically raising prices until they see resistance from customers. They've been bragging about it during earnings, and their EPS growth has been phenomenal. In my local area there are fast-food places that used to be more expensive than McDonald's, but are now cheaper, and have better quality.
The general economic metrics are positive, but skewed. The pandemic disrupted huge portions of the economy, and some fared better than others. Prices are up across the board, but wages aren't up to match.
Before the Pandemic, I remember getting 1-3% raises and getting told "we do this to match the cost of living". Now the increase year-over-year to the cost of living is much higher, yet the raises (if they are there at all) are the same magnitude as before. Some people are much better off, though: the increased spending in the economy isn't coming from thin air. There is a portion of the population who is doing much better, but it doesn't extend to everyone.
Then, you have the mess of the Housing market here. Prices have skyrocketed across the board, as well as interest rates, at least in part due to the pandemic - the government had to print a lot of money to get through it, and the corrsponding rise interest rates came so fast it even caught some banks by surprise. People who were lucky enough to buy in at the right time are doing much better.
Now, the economy being in the state it is now is better than the alternative. Democrats need to make the case that their policies have the best chance of improving everyone's situation, and that it would be best to have all the levers of government to do that. So it's not just the Presidential election that is critical, but all the downballot races as well.
yes this. I used to work at a university where the raises were like 1 or 2 percent below inflation. Half the years I worked there was no raise because it was low inflation times. Going into the public sector I generally got about inflation but when infaltion went haywire the raises stayed the same.
Regular people haven't been compensated for the massive inflation that has been present for every year under Biden. Last year was better at 3.4%, but it's still the higher than every other year since 2007. You have to look back to the 80s to find a worse 3 year period for inflation.
Too many losers who don't own stocks.
this post was submitted on 01 May 2024
-3 points (46.2% liked)
politics
19088 readers
3666 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS