this post was submitted on 08 May 2024
640 points (97.9% liked)

Science Memes

15468 readers
2677 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Please_Do_Not@lemm.ee 88 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's actually even more unlikely that they would be able to learn how to talk. This guy's clearly not a very good scientist if he missed that.

[–] NegativeInf@lemmy.world 52 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'd be questioning the unique selective pressures that caused the hundred acre wood to produce sentient stuffing filled animals.

[–] rockerface@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago

I mean, if it's the Red Forest, anything is possible

[–] Please_Do_Not@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

Darwin's got his finches, Dawkins has his teddy, each instrumental to the modern understanding of natural selection.

[–] Opisek@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Or he knows something we don't...

[–] waigl@lemmy.world 58 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Unlike with Neil DeGrasse Tyson, with Dawkins, I would be quite surprised if he brought that up without being quite specifically asked about it…

[–] SonnyVabitch@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's probably from an hour long portrait interview, in which they cover a lot of ground including favourite English literary pieces, and the interviewer tries to tie it to the guest. They would probably ask David Beckham which Harry Potter character he'd have on his football team.

[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'd have thought Dean Thomas. Isn't he a West Ham fan? He'd at least know the rules, which is probably more than can be said of the average wizard.

[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

Great call!

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Dawkins would have shitposted on Twitter with the best of them if he'd been born later

[–] frezik@midwest.social 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ironhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 37 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But, now hear me out, what if there was also a rabbit?

[–] Davel23@fedia.io 22 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Why stop there? Owl! Tiger! Kangaroo!

[–] LordTrychon@startrek.website 3 points 1 year ago

Tigger. There's a double-guh.

[–] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's morphin' time!

[–] spirinolas@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago

Yeah, not with that attitude, Richard.

[–] gasgiant@lemmy.ml 24 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This looks like something from Viz magazine. They'll regularly have big one page jokes about something and then have these little made up side bits in.

Whole thing was probably about illegal immigrants taking small boats to the hundred acre wood and then there's this little bit in the bottom.

[–] gasgiant@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 year ago

Here's an example. The thoughts of the 1966 world cup winning squad on the disappearance of Lord Lucan

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TOModera@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I mean, he's a Tigger, not a Tiger, so that's off.

[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Bruh you can't just drop the t-word like that

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ParabolicMotion@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don’t think those animals would be stitched together with cloth and stuffed with cotton, either.

[–] NABDad@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I came here looking to see if anyone would point out that they are toy animals, not real ones.

[–] threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

they are toy animals, not real ones

A couple of them were real animals, and this is reflected in the stories.

The two characters areOwl and Rabbit.
In one of the stories, one of them says to the other "You and I have brains, the others have fluff".

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Entropywins@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I mean, the dude studied zoology at Balliol College, Oxford, so he is an expert on the matter...

[–] aport@programming.dev 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And yet his statement is missing the oxford comma

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] essteeyou@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Someone take Dawkins to a zoo.

[–] charonn0@startrek.website 7 points 1 year ago

"Richard Dawkins confirms intelligent design mostly likely explanation"

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago
[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

I'm sure there's regions where people have pigs and donkeys and there are bears and tigers in the woods.

However, it would not end up well for the pig or the donkey if they hung out

[–] Belgdore@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago (5 children)

If someone released a donkey in East India this would be very plausible. Kangaroos on the other hand…

[–] dumbass@leminal.space 3 points 1 year ago

Yeah there's no way that Kanga hasn't beaten the shit out of them all already for getting too close to Roo, especially Tigger and Pooh.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] AncientFutureNow@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I like this guy less and less every day.

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It is unlikely that this transphobe will be remembered in a positive light in ten years.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (7 children)
[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

He claimed several times that transpeople were just the gender version of "Black Face", so much so they rescinded one of his humanism awards

[–] MBM 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Wild that you're getting downvoted, I didn't know people actually like Dawkins. Here's The Guardian's article

[–] tweeks@feddit.nl 6 points 1 year ago

His wording is a bit harsh, but I don't think what he says should receive such a backlash. He expresses hard stances on religion as well, which can hurt people in a similar way as that's also part of their identity.

I think he's not entirely accurate here though, as there can really be biological mixes / nuances in the sex of people. Even if you exclude the gender discussion on top. It's all just a gradual thing I'd guess, even possibly inconsistent in 'percentage' on different parts of the body.

And all in all it's also dependent on our culture how we perceive some things as feminine and masculine.

I don't get why we can't agree that biologically people tend to be on a multidimensional spectrum, which sometimes is too ambiguous for the naked eye to pin a binary value on. Even scientifically it could be difficult to determine. Above all, on the gender side we indeed should have the courtesy to trust how someone feels and likes to be perceived in this world.

But we can also not blame people for expressing uneasiness if the biological sex and gender are too far apart in how we defined it culturally over thousands of years. One cannot avoid some conflict there.

Hopefully we can try to better ourselves and respect others, in both ways.

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Remember that time he excused a woman getting sexually assaulted in an elevator by an Atheist, and he just shrugged it off as "A Muslim would have done worse" and claimed she was overreacting... haha... Dawkins is a piece of shit.

He has also argued for Non-Local Consciousness and claims to be a "Cultural Christian", so I wonder if he's even an Atheist anymore....

[–] tweeks@feddit.nl 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Do you have a source for that; what I could find in a quick Google about his statements on rape is his arguments on X is bad and Y is worse. Which is more of a logical argument, but this does not include "a Muslim would have done worse".

Quote by him: "Date rape is bad. Stranger rape at knifepoint is worse. If you think that's an endorsement of date rape, go away and learn how to think."

These statements are bound to be controversial as people might somehow interpret X is not bad as Y is worse. But I would disagree, this is more of a thought experiment in which you can always have a worse situation.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] 01011@monero.town 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

If you were raised in "the West" then you are most likely passively "culturally Christian" too.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

claims to be a "Cultural Christian"

What does that even mean? If it includes "I put up Christmas lights" then I guess I'm a Christian too.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›