153
submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by breakfastmtn@lemmy.ca to c/news@lemmy.world

The Republican speaker of the House, Mike Johnson, traveled to Columbia University two weeks ago to decry the “virus of antisemitism” that he said pro-Palestinian protesters were spreading across the country. “They have chased down Jewish students. They have mocked them and reviled them,” he said to jeers from protesters. “They have shouted racial epithets. They have screamed at those who bear the Star of David.”

. . .

Amid the widening protests and the unease, if not fear, among many Jews, Republicans have sought to seize the political advantage by portraying themselves as the true protectors of Israel and Jews under assault from the progressive left.

. . .

Debate rages over the extent to which the protests on the political left constitute coded or even direct attacks on Jews. But far less attention has been paid to a trend on the right: For all of their rhetoric of the moment, increasingly through the Trump era many Republicans have helped inject into the mainstream thinly veiled anti-Jewish messages with deep historical roots.

The conspiracy theory taking on fresh currency is one that dates back hundreds of years and has perennially bubbled into view: that a shady cabal of wealthy Jews secretly controls events and institutions contrary to the national interest of whatever country it is operating in.

MBFC
Archive

top 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 72 points 6 months ago

I'm Jewish and I'm going to echo several points I made in previous threads. Apologies if you have already seen them:

  1. I have never in my life, until Israel started this genocide, heard any Republicans stand up and collectively speak out against antisemitism. They sure didn't give a fuck when I was watching in horror while Nazis in Charlottesville chanted "Jews will not replace us."

  2. The George Soros antisemitism shit is so fucking transparent. They don't even hide it. To paraphrase what Matt Gaetz said in the article because I don't want to look it back up, "not every criticism of George Soros is antisemitic." Some More News did a really good episode on this subject that just came out and does point out some legitimate criticisms of Soros, none of which Republicans make: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EEZzlC3gYk8

  3. It is true that evangelical Christians believe that Israel has to exist for Jesus to return. This is the part they don't say out loud: Every Jew in the world has to be exiled to Israel for this to happen.

  4. Not all Jews are Israelis and not all Jews support Israel's genocide or apartheid. I certainly don't and never have. I feel no allegiance to Israel whatsoever. I am from Indiana and have far more things in common with a Christian from Indiana than I do practically anyone in Haifa. The entity that benefits the most from people thinking all Jews are Israelis is Israel. Do not fall for it.

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 14 points 6 months ago

Exactly. Well said. Netanyahu is also to blame for leveraging antisemitism as a defense against criticism of Israel. It muddys the waters and confuses actual messages condemning antisemitism. Many incorrectly read Biden’s condemnations of antisemitism as being critical of anti-Israel protest, for example. It now requires the listener to first determine the speaker’s understanding of antisemitism, and filter it through perceived agenda to determine their actual intent, leading to a subjective message and dilution of a two millennia plight of the Jewish people. It’s despicable.

[-] MikhailBoho@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 6 months ago

Thank you for commenting. Your perspective is invaluable.

[-] nixcamic@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago
  1. It is true that evangelical Christians believe that Israel has to exist for Jesus to return. This is the part they don't say out loud: Every Jew in the world has to be exiled to Israel for this to happen.

I grew up fairly fundamentalist and just wanna point out that while some evangelicals believe this it's far from universal. (The every Jew in the world being there part, not the Israel having to exist part)

[-] dogslayeggs@lemmy.world 30 points 6 months ago

MTG, the person who blamed CA wildfires on Jewish space lasers, is showing her support for Israel...

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 19 points 6 months ago

And then tweeted this a few days ago:

Antisemitism is wrong, but I will not be voting for the Antisemitism Awareness Act of 2023 (H.R. 6090) today that could convict Christians of antisemitism for believing the Gospel that Jesus was handed over to Herod to be crucified by the Jews

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2024/05/02/mtg-votes-against-antisemitism-awareness-act-antisemitic-trope/73539622007/

The act itself is bullshit, but that's just sick.

[-] dogslayeggs@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

I think X is wrong, but I want it to be legal to do wrong stuff that I like.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world -2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Okay? This has nothing to do with Twitter apart from it being the medium she used to be antisemitic about a bill going through congress.

Edit: I see you completely edited your original comment which talked about being blocked from Twitter.

[-] MightBeAlpharius@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago

I think there may have been a tragic misunderstanding... It looks like they were using X as a placeholder, rather than the noun that Elon wants it to be; but the sentence construction could have been clearer.

Something like "I think X is wrong, but I want it to be legal for me to do wrong things Y and Z" might be a bit closer to what they were going for.

[-] dogslayeggs@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

Where did I talk about Twitter? And I didn't edit anything.

[-] kromem@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago

Just as criticism of Israel's behaviors isn't antisemitism, defense of their authoritarian violence isn't pro-Jewish.

Most right wing support of Israel comes from an interpretation of Revelations from the 20th century that Israel needed to exist again for Jesus to float down from the sky, when he would subsequently resurrect the believers into heaven and cast the nonbelievers (including the Jews) into eternal torment.

So the 'support' of Christian nationalists for Israel in their mind is kind of like a Looney Toons character pretending to be nice as they guide another character under an anvil.

They are so supportive that they can't wait for all the Jews to be in one place so they can be cast into hell by their beloved ancient comic book character.

[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 3 points 6 months ago

There's a lot of folks who believe that the destruction of Israel is the first stage in bringing the Messiah back.

[-] MxM111@kbin.social 5 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

What? Should it be the other way around? “Restoration of Israel”, “Rebuilding of the Third Temple” are Christian professors leading to the second coming of Jesus. That’s the reasons why religious right supports Israel.

[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 3 points 6 months ago
[-] MxM111@kbin.social 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Well, for that you need Armageddon, not tiny Israel, and only AFTER the third temple, which has not happened.

[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 1 points 6 months ago

For fun, look up a recent TV show called 'Dig.' It's about the efforts of a cabal of different religious types to push the clock forward and bring about the End Times.

[-] MxM111@kbin.social 1 points 6 months ago

Well, we don’t use fictional TV shows to describe reality, do we?

[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 1 points 6 months ago

The first two words of my comment were 'For fun.'

BTW, people have been using fiction to inspire reality for years. Back in the day, Nellie Bly travelled around the world in 75 days and NASA named an actual spaceship "Enterprise" because of a TV show whose name escapes me.

[-] MxM111@kbin.social 1 points 6 months ago

I understand your suggestion is for found, but it sounded as if it is possible to learn something from those. Which I seriously doubt. As for inspiration, other than names and words (e.g. robot), not a lot of ideology got transferred into real lives. There are exceptions, of course. Like Ann Ryan’s book “Atlas Shredded” is popular on the right, Heinlein’s “Stranger in a Strange Land” influenced the left in the sixties, but I think those are rather exceptions. A very small fraction of books and shows do that. I hope that the show you suggesting is not one of those.

[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 1 points 6 months ago
[-] xc2215x@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

They like Israel more than Palestine so they will support Israel.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

Do they not do the thing with the parentheses anymore? Or is that just too much punctuation for them.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Parentheses thing?

You mean vampire Kirby?

<( •,_,•<)

Or do you mean vampire slayer Kirby?

<===|—<( •_•<)

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

Heh, no they used to do (((person’s name))) to say “they’re Jewish” although their particular phrasing might have been a little more crude. Haven’t seen it for a long time tho. Well, several years anyway.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

And I thought I was weird for vampire Kirby….

The 2k’s were weird,

They seem weird and deranged.

[-] Uranium3006@kbin.social -2 points 6 months ago

Zionism has always been antisemitic

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

Now that's not true. Zionism, as originally envisioned by Theodore Herzl, was about getting Jews the fuck out of Europe before there was a genocide, which he saw coming after the Dreyfus affair. He said he thought defeating antisemitism in Europe would never happen. Yes, the place that Herzl, and others, envisioned was "The Holy Land," where Israel is now, and that was always a bad idea, but it was originally an attempt to avoid the genocide that eventually happened.

Now, to Herzl's credit, he tried very hard to negotiate a settlement with the Ottomans for a legal land transfer of Palestine to create a Jewish state. The Sultan turned him down, but he never intended to seize the land through military conquest.

Herzl also wanted a secular state and was not a religious Jew. In fact, he was an Atheist. He and his wife even refused to circumcise their son. He just wanted to save his ethnicity from being killed off in Europe... and then, about 50 years after he died, that's exactly what the Nazis tried to do.

Zionism today certainly promotes antisemitism, but the original idea, where it was a peaceful land transfer and a secular state designed to avert a coming genocide, was the opposite of antisemitism.

this post was submitted on 09 May 2024
153 points (95.8% liked)

News

23284 readers
3836 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS