this post was submitted on 05 May 2024
23 points (96.0% liked)

Greentext

6796 readers
1539 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] beeng@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It does seem like the ideology of those inside google went from "tech" , to "I know better than you do". Not sure it's fixable really..

[–] ArtificialLink@lemy.lol 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

That's the problem with most tech these days. They assume they know the best way to do something or know better than you. Its infuriating

[–] joonazan@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 1 year ago

It's about minimizing the annoyance for the majority of users who will misspell some popular thing.

Also, I believe that showing actually interesting content is bad for the businesses because it might make the user stop to think and pursue something meaningful instead of continuing to use the product.

[–] NoSpiritAnimal@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Spotify is a prime example of this. There are so many "features" I hate and that no one has asked for, yet shuffle doesn't even work.

Everytime I start spotify in ny office after listening on my commute, it tries to start playing on my phone since that was playing in my car.

Or when I was still there, Reddit search. Absolutely useless and so fucking smarmy with that stupid doge.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What do you mean by "shuffle doesn't even work"? Please qualify that statement.

[–] businessfish@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

they may be referring to how spotify's shuffle isn't a true "shuffle" in that it is biased to things you have listened to more, recently, etc

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev -1 points 1 year ago

That's been the case for well over a decade going back to some of the earliest iPods. It's nothing new.

[–] Baku@aussie.zone 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A couple of years ago I found a black and white photo from the late 1800s and wanted to figure out what station it was from. Google was useless and only showed unrelated stations, but surprisingly, Bing found a page with the exact photo on it. It was on one of those shitty scraper pages that just lists thousands and thousands of random photos, but nonetheless I figured out what station it was

[–] lars@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Jesus Christ I guess I’m not misremembering.

Bing’s reverse image search is essentially dead in 2024 unless you’re uploading the Mona Lisa. It’s really, really terrible and even worse than Google.

My favorites right now are Tineye, Yandex, and Google, in that order.

[–] peteypete420@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

Just that name Tineye. Now I need to find images I have a reason to search.

[–] TheCorminator@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago
[–] Klear@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Unrealistic. I usually have to scroll way down in the results to find a link to wikipedia nowadays.

[–] pachrist@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

So true. If I want to know how old a celebrity is, first result is something about their latest work that doesn't mention age, and then the next 3-4 are usually some ranking articles, "top 10 ceberities you didn't know were 50," and then Wikipedia comes in with the answer.

[–] PP_BOY_@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] hellfire103@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I don't even care if the results are good. I'm not about to use any part of RUnet.

[–] jeremyparker@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Honest question: why not? Facebook/Google/Microsoft are up to some disgusting shit, are their Russian counterparts significantly different?

[–] hellfire103@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

Privacy, for one thing. I don't use Google, Bing, Windows, or any Meta software*, and Yandex aren't much different.

Security, though, is another thing. I live in a NATO country, and I would imagine the Russian government are monitoring Yandex (and other RUnet services). Frankly, I think contributing any data to such a government would be against my interests.

There's also a lot of censorship on RUnet. Yeah, Google has that too, but Mojeek and Brave Search do not.

TL;DR: Google is data-hungry and supplies data to the NSA; Yandex is data-hungry and supplies data to the Kremlin; Mojeek and Brave Search are good; DDG and Startpage are the best for the average user.

[–] PP_BOY_@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Why noy? RuTracker is better than any other tracker, open or private.

[–] CCF_100@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm going to make the assumption that a lot of people on Lemmy are FOSS enthusiasts and are therefore adverse to anything closed source, especially a Russian web service...

[–] PP_BOY_@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What? We're talking about websites, not software here

[–] iiGxC@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Guess what websites are made of

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh I know this one!

It's pipes, right‽

[–] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago
[–] suction@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Perversity and males in Japan. Name a better team.

[–] PiratePanPan@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Guns and schools in America. Name a better team.

[–] suction@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The 95-96 Chicago Bulls, you despicable white knight weeaboo?

[–] PiratePanPan@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago

Weeaboo is when I make fun of you for generalizing an entire population