125

Unpaywalled archive link: https://archive.ph/TDGsk Open Access link to the study mentioned: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/puh2.27

Posting because I saw another post on this community about Extinction Rebellion UK blocking a private jet airport today (June 2024) (https://extinctionrebellion.uk/2024/06/02/climate-activists-blockade-farnborough-private-jet-airports-three-main-gates/) and wondered how many people know that leaded fuel is still pretty common in planes, both in the UK and elsewhere; I was pretty shocked when I first learned this

top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] OminousOrange@lemmy.ca 36 points 5 months ago

Leaded fuel is still used in piston airplanes everywhere. While there are ongoing efforts to develop an unleaded alternative, there is none currently available to the market.

[-] rtxn@lemmy.world 23 points 5 months ago

There are already multiple unleaded aviation fuels in testing, and one (G100UL) commercially available. The main barrier is that the engines, especially larger and older ones, are not designed to run on unleaded fuel, and must be certified.

[-] OminousOrange@lemmy.ca 7 points 5 months ago

Right, hopefully G100UL can replace 100LL reasonably quickly, but there's a big difference between "commercially available" and actually available. I imagine it will be quite some time until it's commonplace for GA aircraft, unfortunately.

[-] ephemeral_gibbon@aussie.zone 0 points 5 months ago

If they aren't absolutely essential for some important societal function the aircraft should just be grounded rather than be allowed to fly on leaded. No one's toy or joy ride should be giving thousands of people lead poisoning

[-] RGB3x3@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

Well it's about time they get the lead out and get the lead out!

[-] veganpizza69@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

The alternative is to ground them. Into dust (and recycle).

[-] OminousOrange@lemmy.ca 3 points 5 months ago

What's your alternative for access and supplies to many remote communities?

[-] veganpizza69@lemmy.world -3 points 5 months ago

Same as for current lunar communities.

[-] Sizzler@slrpnk.net -3 points 5 months ago

Lol, remote and UK is about 5 Scottish islande.

History should stay preserved, you want your items to be a discovery don't you.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 15 points 5 months ago

Humanity: but it’s poisoning the planet, and the humans

Business: lol yeah

[-] br3d@lemmy.world 22 points 5 months ago

It's not even business - a lot of small planes are just hobbyists. So we're getting poisoned (to say nothing of the noise pollution) by people flying in circles for fun

[-] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

finally someone who gets it.

I wonder if we'll ever come to a time when we can get the vroom vroom crowd to put down their poisoning toys, something tells me our species is fucked because they're never going to stop.

we have an air show here in Seattle every summer where the navy burns tens of thousands of gallons to VROOM f-18s around the lake.

I'm prior service, I'm not anti-military extremist, but do we really need to dump tens of thousands of gallons of gas into the summer (already shitty) air quality and the CO2 it becomes after combustion? for 'patriotism'?

Logically, no, but god forbid you take away the circuses from people, even if it's hurting their communities.

[-] CouncilOfFriends@slrpnk.net 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Roughly a quarter of General Aviation traffic (which is primarily piston single-engine aircraft) is flight training, 30% is personal use, and the other 45% is commerce. I'm hoping we can increase adoption of unleaded alternatives since I don't see most of those flights going away.

[-] mlg@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

Mmm yummy 100LL

this post was submitted on 03 Jun 2024
125 points (100.0% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5197 readers
735 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS