You said there’s nuance but then went on to explain that there isn’t nuance and the only reasonable vote is for Biden. And you’re not wrong. There are a lot of folks pretending to be on the left acting like there’s a whole lot of nuance here, and that voting for someone other than Biden, or not voting at all, is an acceptable option.

None of this precludes advocating for your positions or doing other praxis, but when it comes to voting the answer is clear

It’s far too late for baby steps

Literally the next sentence in the article:

Digital wallets […] have exploded in popularity but are not captured by Australian payments law.

The article doesn’t bother explaining what specifically the law does.

archive/paywall bypass link

cringe. It's actually good to take action to reduce harm.

Then why are they protesting action that will end the war faster?

It’s a brand exposure exercise… why are you helping the crypto scammers increase their brand exposure?

And it’s September. /c/mildlyinfuriating

Per the article:

Scott Gessler, a former Colorado secretary of state representing Trump in the case, opposed it. He said a protective order was unnecessary because threats and intimidation already are prohibited by law.

And then they don’t explain further

I think the reason you’re not finding what you’re looking for is because another widely agreed upon problem with pgp is that it is a generic encryption and signing tool and those turn out to be a bit of a UX nightmare. Building purpose-specific encryption into other applications tends to have much safer UX, that also tends to be less confusing.

That being said, age may do some of what you’re looking for. I don’t think it does signing but it does do encryption.

The thing that’s known about is the payload not the vulnerability. They keep finding new bulbs and dropping the same payload.

Lack of high speed rail isn’t caused by lack of knowledge about how to do it. High speed rail exists in some places, just not the US.