339
all 46 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Additional_Prune@lemmy.world 103 points 11 months ago

If I ever find myself as a defendant in a fraud trial, maybe I should try repeatedly insulting the judge, prosecutor, and clerk and calling them names, just to see what happens next. Wanna bet I'd find my ass in jail with a contempt charge? Every day, Trump shows there really is a two-tiered justice system.

[-] TechyDad@lemmy.world 28 points 11 months ago

Trump keeps claiming that he's being treated differently by the justice system. He means that he's being treated worse and he's wrong about that, but he is accidentally correct in that he's being treated better than any other defendant would be treated. If you or I were facing 10% of the charges Trump is facing, we'd (rightfully) be sitting in a jail cell awaiting trial.

[-] CleoTheWizard@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

I don’t expect a former president to get the same treatment as me. I expect them to have it better since our nation somewhat depends on them not being treated better.

Especially currently, the judges are very smart in not pursuing apt punishment for his small infractions. Their eye is on the ultimate justice here. Because small punishments only stoke the fires. Small punishments make this look petty and weak and as if they want to get him for anything and everything.

Will people still think that? Yes. But the image of these particular cases is far more important to justice than violations of gag orders.

Just keep that in mind. Going after him for every small thing is more likely to cause further injustice in the nation if he wins election.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago

It's like he doesn't realize performing for his fans will cost him his entire business empire. Bizarre.

[-] ECB@feddit.de 21 points 11 months ago

I think what the OP is referring to is that Trump HASN'T had any real repercussions for acting the way he has, whereas a 'normal' person would have ended up with charges by now.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

I wasn't disagreeing. I was saying I have no idea why he thinks this won't piss off the judge even more beyond plain stupidity (which might be all it is) and it's not a jury trial. The company has already been found liable. The more he pisses off the judge, the more likely the judge will end his business empire.

So maybe he's an idiot and thinks he'll get away with it this time, but he already hasn't gotten away with it. He's already past that point in this trial.

[-] Catma@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

I hate giving Trump credit for anything but I think this may be calculated to some extent. He knows his business is toast in NY and knows he was already found liable. His constant back and forth with the court is to get the fine as high as possible. His followers will see it as the courts going after their guy. They will not care he was found liable already because the evidence was so overwhelming the judge even in the most favourable terms saw no chance for him to win the case. All they will see is the judge extracting a huge fine because he is a a NY judge. They will blame Biden or liberals or the deep state. Never the one person that is truely at fault.

This is the same play as Alex Jones, Steve Bannon, and Roger Stone.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

Yeah, but he's still lost his main source of income. Possibly even Mar-a-Lago.

[-] JunkMilesDavis@kbin.social 1 points 11 months ago

I would guess it's about as calculated as a fish swimming. The guy has simply always done this in all situations, and it has never not worked, so why would he stop. It's like the world-record run of playing "Do you know who I am?" with the police officer.

[-] SocialMediaSettler@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago

Thing is, this isn't justice. This is reality TV.

[-] Nurse_Robot@lemmy.world 97 points 11 months ago

Now imagine if you or I acted this way. We would go straight to prison.

I cannot believe how far we've fallen.

[-] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 52 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Mate, the oligarchy have been getting away with the worst crimes imaginable since forever. The only difference with Trump is how publicly and brazenly he is with his crimes.

The average member of the rich and powerful across business and politics are far more corrupt and sociopathic than the rest of the population. Absolute power corrupts absolutely.

[-] MagicShel@programming.dev 9 points 11 months ago

You hear about "Russian Oligarchs" all the time, but "American Oligarchs" so rarely. That's a concept that needs to be out there more - that we are actually ruled by the wealthy. It's practically the end goal of capitalism.

[-] CuddlyCassowary@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago
[-] AlexanderESmith@kbin.social 70 points 11 months ago

Why the fuck would you pause it? They should lock an actual gag around his mouth and leave it there.

[-] squiblet@kbin.social 56 points 11 months ago

It was lifted by an appeals court judge who, coincidentally, was appointed by a former Republican governor.

[-] ZoopZeZoop@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago
[-] winterayars@sh.itjust.works 1 points 11 months ago

Lack of pattern recognition. Or corruption.

[-] jeffw@lemmy.world 49 points 11 months ago

I, for one, am shocked!

Jk everyone knew this would happen

[-] Makeitstop@lemmy.world 47 points 11 months ago

A lawyer for Mr. Trump, Alina Habba, praised the appellate court after the Thursday hearing and quickly took advantage of the development.

Ms. Greenfield “is in the judge’s ear time and time again,” Ms. Habba said. “If she had a real threat, she should get off the bench.”

"We have never encouraged death threats against the individuals we scream about online, while sharing their names, pictures and even addresses. But if those people have gotten death threats at some point after our unrelated personal attacks, then clearly they should give in to the demands of the people threatening them. Demands which just so happen to align with our interests."

I can only hope that this shithead ends up facing legal problems like so many other Trump lawyers. Or that she ends up getting doxed and harassed so severely that she becomes a recluse, though I'm not sure what she'd have to do to get anyone to give enough of a shit to put in the effort.

[-] eestileib@sh.itjust.works 38 points 11 months ago

Must be nice to be above the law.

[-] NounsAndWords@lemmy.world 18 points 11 months ago

From what I hear from Trump, it's terrible and incredibly unfair (for him).

[-] xerazal@lemmy.zip 38 points 11 months ago

Why would you pause the gag order?

Ffs throw orange Hitler and his ilk in jail. They've proven that they're dangerous, petulant children.

[-] PoliticalAgitator@lemm.ee 14 points 11 months ago

But if they punish a rich person for crimes, whats next? Punishing other rich people for crimes? Outrageous!

[-] squiblet@kbin.social 33 points 11 months ago

He, without fail, manages to come up with the most annoying shit imaginable. And it’s always about how he is a victim of something “unfair”… from this guy who, other than being a moron, has lived one of the most charmed and fortunate lives possible.

[-] NounsAndWords@lemmy.world 28 points 11 months ago

I just don't get it. There is a significant portion of the population that watches that exact same thing and believes it to be the epitome of manliness. How the fuck did this happen?

[-] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

He, without fail, manages to come up with the most annoying shit imaginable. And it’s always about how he is a victim of something “unfair”… from this guy who, other than being a moron, has lived one of the most charmed and fortunate lives possible.

He does it because it works.

[-] squiblet@kbin.social 1 points 11 months ago

Sure, it’s along the same lines as the constant Fox News outrage, along with the general conservative and Christian “omg I’m persecuted” thing.

[-] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 27 points 11 months ago

So witness intimidation and jury tampering are no longer a thing, because they're protected under the attacker's free speech rights?

[-] Asafum@feddit.nl 7 points 11 months ago

*only if you're a "rich" ex-president who has a death cult following him

[-] Im14abeer@midwest.social 24 points 11 months ago

I feel for the targets of his impotent rage. The good of it is this is the crying and gnashing of teeth before he is fined millions of dollars and is forced to divest from New York. So, silver linings I guess

[-] eestileib@sh.itjust.works 27 points 11 months ago

I have no faith that that will actually happen.

[-] elbarto777@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago

Yup. I'll believe it when I see it.

[-] winterayars@sh.itjust.works 23 points 11 months ago

Nobody involved in this is learning any lessons about shit.

[-] Ranvier@sopuli.xyz 23 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Wow, I'm sure this is going to ingratiate him to the judge, who has already ruled guilty and gets to decide to what extent his businesses are dismantled and how high the fines go, which could go as high as $250 million and easily bankrupt his grossly over leveraged fraudulent organization. But no, go on ahead Trump, keep harassing the Judge who is also the jury in this case. See how it plays out in the end.

But seriously, what asinine appellate judge thought staying this order was appropriate? Trump is right, he is treated differently than every other defendant, given vastly more privileges, deference, and advantages than any normal defendant. Any other person would be locked in jail at this point. Most judges falling all over themselves to give him whatever he wants though, many appointed by himself. Gag order may be reinstated within a couple weeks though. And he continues to dig his own grave in terms of providing loads of evidence to support why he should be under gag orders for his other cases as well.

[-] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago

The problem is they're letting him dig more graves than his own. Our "justice" system is a fucking joke.

Literally, this is worse than kindergarten. At least there, there'd be an authority to come in and remove the child smearing fecal matter on the walls...

[-] MCk3@lemmy.world 18 points 11 months ago
[-] OneOrTheOtherDontAskMe@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Hey, you. You're doing Cthulu's work. Thank you

[-] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 14 points 11 months ago
[-] flipht@kbin.social 24 points 11 months ago

He's deliberately provoking so he can claim Persecution Points. It's the biggest PP he's got.

[-] autotldr 9 points 11 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


This week, Mr. Trump’s lawyers challenged both of those orders in an appeals court and on Thursday, the appellate judge, David Friedman, paused them after an hourlong oral argument.

About an hour after the New York gag orders were paused, Jason Miller, a senior adviser to Mr. Trump, posted on social media attacking Allison Greenfield, the clerk, calling her a “Democrat Operative.”

The schedule set by the appeals court means that the gag orders could remain paused for much of the remainder of the civil fraud trial, which stems from a lawsuit brought by the New York attorney general, Letitia James.

Last month, after the judge overseeing Mr. Trump’s federal election interference case briefly paused a gag order she had imposed on him, the former president used the window of opportunity to launch a spree of attacks against the people who had been off limits.

Three times in three days, he called the special counsel, Jack Smith, who had brought the case, “deranged.” Twice, he weighed in about testimony attributed to his former chief of staff, Mark Meadows, who could be a witness in the trial.

Justice Engoron imposed his own gag order on Mr. Trump on Oct. 3, after the former president posted a picture of Ms. Greenfield with Senator Chuck Schumer, the Democratic majority leader.


The original article contains 926 words, the summary contains 217 words. Saved 77%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[-] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

He’s such a coward.

[-] fox2263@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Whats it with dump and the clerk?

[-] ElBarto@sh.itjust.works 1 points 11 months ago

Trump watching his watch as it hits the end time: YOUR ALL BITCHES!

this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2023
339 points (98.0% liked)

politics

19072 readers
3815 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS